Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Chromosome pairing and chiasma formation in spermatocytes and oocytes of Dendrocoelum lactem (Turbellaria, Tricladida); a cytogenetical and ultrastructural study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 August 1989

Chromosome pairing and chiasma formation in spermatocytes and oocytes of Dendrocoelum lactem (Turbellaria, Tricladida); a cytogenetical and ultrastructural study

  • G H Jones1 &
  • J A Croft1 

Heredity volume 63, pages 97–106 (1989)Cite this article

  • 840 Accesses

  • 20 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The hermaphroditic flatworm Dendrocoelum lacteum shows a very pronounced sex difference in chiasma frequency; oocytes have 66 per cent more chiasmata than spermatocytes. The ultrastructural basis of this difference was investigated by three-dimensional reconstruction of synaptonemal complexes from ten oocytes and ten spermatocytes at pachytene and smaller numbers of zygotene nuclei. Oocyte nuclei at pachytene are larger and have longer synaptonemal complexes than the equivalent spermatocyte stage. The difference in synaptonemal complex length (60 per cent) corresponds very closely to the difference in chiasma frequency shown by oocytes and spermatocytes and suggests that synaptonemal complex (SC) length may contribute to the regulation of chiasma frequency. Recombination nodules were observed in both spermatocytes and oocytes but their quantitation was unreliable because they are small and differentiation from the unusually dense and prominent central region is difficult. Analysis of the few zygotene nuclei available shows that pairing is predominantly proterminal in both spermatocytes and oocytes, but oocytes may have several additional interstitial initiations. These extra initiations are likely to be necessary for efficient pairing of the longer oocyte chromosomes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Transcriptomic analysis of cumulus cells shows altered pathways in patients with minimal and mild endometriosis

Article Open access 06 April 2022

Induction of experimental cell division to generate cells with reduced chromosome ploidy

Article Open access 30 September 2025

Changes in the transcriptomic profile of cumulus cells under the influence of cumulus-oocytes complex pre-incubation

Article Open access 26 July 2024

Article PDF

References

  • Aeppli, E. 1951. Die Chromosomenverhaltnisse bei Dendrocoelum infernale (Steinmann). Ein Beitrage zur Polyploidie in Tierreich. Rev Suisse Zool, 58, 511–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, G. 1909. The prophase in the oogenesis and the spermatogenesis of Planaria lactea O.F.M. (Dendrocoelum lacteum Oerst.). Arch Zellforsch, 3, 431–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, I R, and Reynoldson, T B. 1981. British Planarians Synopses of the British Fauna, 19. Edited by D. M. Kermack and R. S. K. Barnes. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benazzi, M, and Benazzi Lentati, G. 1976. Animal Cytogenetics. Edited by B. John, H. Bauer, S. Brown, H. Kayano, A. Levan, M. White. Vol. 1: Platyhelminthes. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benazzi, M, and Pochini, N. 1959. Alcune osservazioni citologische sulla planaria Dendrocoelum lacteum (O. F. Muller). Boll Zool, 26, 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bojko, M. 1985. Human meiosis. IX. Crossing over and chiasma formation in oocytes. Carlsberg Res Commun, 50, 43–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, B, and Goetsch, L. 1975. Electron microscopic observations on the meiotic karyotype of diploid and tetraploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 72, 5056–5060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, A T C. 1979a. Synaptonemal complex and recombination nodules in wild-type Drosophila melanogaster females. Genetics, 92, 511–541.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, A T C. 1979b. Recombination nodules and synaptonemal complex in recombination-defective females of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma, 75, 259–272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, A T C. 1981. EM autoradiographic evidence that DNA synthesis occurs at recombination nodules during meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females. Chromosoma, 83, 59–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, A T C. 1984. Recombination nodules and the mechanism of crossing-over in Drosophila. Controlling Events in Meiosis. Society for Experimental Biology Symposium 28. Edited by C. W. Evans and H. G. Dickinson. Company of Biologists Ltd., Cambridge.

  • Croft, J A, and Jones, G H. 1986. Surface spreading of synaptonemal complexes in locusts. I. Pachytene observations. Chromosoma, 93, 483–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, J A, and Jones, G H. 1989. Meiosis in Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii. IV. Recombination nodules of spermatocytes; a test of the correspondence of late recombination nodules and chiasmata. Genetics, 121, 255–262.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dahm, A G. 1961. Cytotaxonomical analyses of four Dendrocoelum species. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift NF Avd 2, 57, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelei, J. 1913. Uber die Ovogenese von Dendrocoelum lacteum. Arch Zellforsch, 11, 51–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelei, J. 1921. Die Langskonjugation der Chromosomen. Arch Zellforsch, 16, 52–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelei, J. 1922. Die Konjugationsfrage der Chromosomen in der Literatur und meine Befunde. Arch Zellforsch, 16, 300–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, C B, Rasmussen, S W, and von Wettstein, D. 1973. The synaptinemal complex in homologous and nonhomologous pairing of chromosomes. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol, 38, 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, P B, Rasmussen, S W, Zickler, D, Lu, B C, and Sage, E. 1981. Chromosome pairing, recombination nodules and chiasma formation in the Basidiomycete Coprinus cinereus. Carlsberg Res Commun, 46, 305–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G H, and Croft, J A. 1986. Surface spreading of synaptonemal complexes in locusts. II. Zygotene pairing behaviour. Chromosoma, 93, 489–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matern, B, and Simak, M. 1968. Statistical problems in karyotype analysis. Hereditas, 59, 280–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthieson, E. 1904. Ein Beitrag zur Embryologie der Susswasserdendrocoelen. Z wiss Zool, 77, 274–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melander, Y. 1963. Cytogenetic aspects of embryogenesis in Paludiocola, Tricladida. Hereditas, 49, 119–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogensen, H L. 1977. Ultrastructural analysis of female pachynema and the relationship between synaptonemal complex length and crossing-over in Zea mays. Carlsberg Res Commun, 42, 475–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses, M J, and Poorman, P A. 1984. Synapsis, synaptic adjustment and DNA synthesis in mouse oocytes. Chromosomes Today 8. Proceedings of the 8th International Chromosome Conference. Edited by M. D. Bennett, A. Gropp and U. Wolf, George Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 90–103.

  • Oakley, H A. 1982. Meiosis in Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii (Turbellaria, Rhabdocoela) II. Synaptonemal complexes, chromosome pairing and disjunction in achiasmate oogenesis. Chromosoma, 87, 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, H A, and Jones, G H. 1982. Meiosis in Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii (Tubellaria, Rhabdocoela) I. Chromosome pairing, synaptonemal complexes and chiasma localisation in spermatogenesis. Chromosoma, 85, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J B, and Callan, H G. 1952. Chiasma formation in spermatocytes and oocytes of the Turbellarian Dendrocoelum lacteum. J Genet, 50, 449–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, S W, and Holm, P B. 1978. Human meiosis. II. Chromosome pairing and recombination nodules in human spermatocytes. Carlsberg Res Commun, 43, 275–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, S W, and Holm, P B. 1982. The meiotic prophase in Bombyx mori. Insect ultrastructure. Edited by R. C. King and H. Akai. Plenum, New York, London, pp. 61–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Speed, R M. 1977. The effects of ageing on the meiotic chromosomes of male and female mice. Chromosoma, 64, 241–254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Speed, R M. 1982. Meiosis in the foetal mouse ovary. I. An analysis at the light microscope level using surface spreading. Chromosoma, 85, 427–437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, H, Westergaard, M, and von Wettstein, D. 1975. Presynaptic events in meiocytes of Lilium longiflorum and their relation to crossing-over. A preselection hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 72, 961–965.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, B M N, and Hulten, M. 1985. Meiotic chromosome pairing in the normal human female. Ann Hum Genet, 49, 215–226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, B. 1974. A convenient technique for the collection of ultra-thin serial sections. Micron, 5, 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK

    G H Jones & J A Croft

Authors
  1. G H Jones
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J A Croft
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, G., Croft, J. Chromosome pairing and chiasma formation in spermatocytes and oocytes of Dendrocoelum lactem (Turbellaria, Tricladida); a cytogenetical and ultrastructural study. Heredity 63, 97–106 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1989.80

Download citation

  • Received: 17 January 1989

  • Issue date: 01 August 1989

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1989.80

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

  • Male and female meiosis evince differential patterns in chiasma formation: a case study of ornamental plant, Delphinium ajacis L.

    • K. K. Koul
    • Ranjna Nagpal
    • Kamal Nain

    Journal of Genetics (2020)

  • Sex-dependent synaptic behaviour in triploid turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (Pisces, Scophthalmidae)

    • N Cuñado
    • J Terrones
    • J L Santos

    Heredity (2002)

  • The relationship between synapsis and recombination: two different views

    • J L Santos

    Heredity (1999)

  • Correlated variation of chiasma frequency and synaptonemal complex length in Locusta migratoria

    • C Quevedo
    • A L Del Cerro
    • G H Jones

    Heredity (1997)

  • Lateral element lengths and nuclear disposition in Lolium

    • G Jiménez
    • G Jenkins

    Heredity (1995)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited