Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Developments in the meiotic analysis of hybrids. II. Amended models for tetraploids
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 February 1992

Developments in the meiotic analysis of hybrids. II. Amended models for tetraploids

  • C G D Chapman1 &
  • G Kimber2 

Heredity volume 68, pages 105–113 (1992)Cite this article

  • 521 Accesses

  • 6 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Amended models of meiotic behaviour in tetraploid species' hybrids have been constructed which better reflect the theory and assumptions about chromosome pairing necessary to conduct such analyses. In particular they correct problems concerning the distribution of chiasmata among and within chromosome configurations inherent in the earlier models of Kimber & Alonso (1981). In general these analyses give similar interpretations to the earlier models but in some cases call the previous conclusions into question.

Similar content being viewed by others

Chromosomal evolution in Raphicerus antelope suggests divergent X chromosomes may drive speciation through females, rather than males, contrary to Haldane's rule

Article Open access 04 February 2021

Co-inheritance of recombined chromatids maintains heterozygosity in a parthenogenetic ant

Article Open access 16 July 2024

Phylogenomic analyses of all species of swordtail fishes (genus Xiphophorus) show that hybridization preceded speciation

Article Open access 04 August 2024

Article PDF

References

  • Alonso, L C, and Kimber, G. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in hybrids. II. Triploid hybrids. Can J Genet Cytol, 23, 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekharan, P, and Thomas, H. 1971. Studies in Festuca. 6. Chromosome relationships between Bovinae and Scariosae. Z Pflanzenzuchtg, 66, 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C G D, and Kimber, G. 1992a. Developments in the meiotic analysis of hybrids. I. Review of theory and optimization in triploids. Heredity, 68, 97–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C G D, and Kimber, G. 1992b. Developments in the meiotic analysis of hybrids. V. Second order models for tetraploids and pentaploids. Heredity, 68, (in press).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, C F, and Sleper, D A. 1989. A model of meiotic chromosome association in tetraploids. Genome, 32, 691–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, C J, Bielig, L M, and Darvey, N L. 1979. An analysis of frequencies of chromosome configurations in wheat and wheat hybrids. Genetics, 91, 755–767.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Espinasse, A, and Kimber, G. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in hybrids. IV. Pentaploid hybrids. Can J Genet Cytol, 23, 627–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R C, and Casey, J. 1982. Cytogenetic analyses of autopolyploids: models and methods for triploids to octoploids. Am J Bot, 69, 485–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, G, and Alonso, L C. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in hybrids. II. Tetraploid hybrids. Can J Genet Cytol, 23, 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, G, Alonso, L C, and Sallee, P J. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in hybrids. I. Aneuploid hybrids. Can J Genet Cytol, 23, 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, G, Pignone, D, and Sallee, P J. 1983. The relationships of the M and Mu genomes of Triticum. Can J Genet Cytol, 25, 509–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, G, and Tsunewaki, K. 1988. Genome symbols and plasma types in the wheat group. Proc 7th Intern Wheat Genet Symp, Cambridge, UK, 1209–1211.

  • Kimber, G, and Yen, Y. 1988. Hybrids involving wheat relatives and autotetraploid Triticum umbellulatum. Genome, 32, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, F A. 1951. H. Kihara: genome-analysis in Triticum and Aegilops. X. Concluding review. Cytologia, 16, 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. PBI CAMBRIDGE, Maris Lane, Cambridge, Trumpington, CB2 2LQ, UK

    C G D Chapman

  2. Department of Agronomy, Curtis Hall, University of Missouri-Columbia, M.O. 65211, USA

    G Kimber

Authors
  1. C G D Chapman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G Kimber
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, C., Kimber, G. Developments in the meiotic analysis of hybrids. II. Amended models for tetraploids. Heredity 68, 105–113 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.17

Download citation

  • Received: 08 August 1990

  • Issue date: 01 February 1992

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.17

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • meiotic analysis
  • pairing models
  • tetraploids

This article is cited by

  • A critical review of concepts and methods used in classical genome analysis

    • Ole Seberg
    • Gitte Petersen

    The Botanical Review (1998)

  • Cytogenetical analysis of hybrids between sunflower and four wild relatives

    • Anne Espinasse
    • Joseph Foueillassar
    • Gordon Kimber

    Euphytica (1995)

  • Interspecific hybridizations withElymus confusus andE. dolichatherus, and their genomic relationship (Poaceae: Triticeae)

    • Bao-Rong Lu
    • Björn Salomon
    • Roland von Bothmer

    Plant Systematics and Evolution (1995)

  • Developments in the meiotic analysis of hybrids. III. Amended models for pentaploids

    • C G D Chapman
    • G Kimber

    Heredity (1992)

  • Developments in the meiotic analysis of hybrids. IV. Utilizing datasets with merged figure classes

    • C G D Chapman
    • G Kimber

    Heredity (1992)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited