Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Variation in the mode of reproduction among individuals of the ostracod Candonocypris novaezelandiae
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 May 1992

Variation in the mode of reproduction among individuals of the ostracod Candonocypris novaezelandiae

  • J A Chaplin1 

Heredity volume 68, pages 411–424 (1992)Cite this article

  • 1096 Accesses

  • 26 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

This study describes the results of laboratory breeding experiments designed to determine the mode of reproduction of female Candonocypris novaezelandiae from populations with and without males. Two morphological forms of this species were studied: a large-green and small-brown morph. Large-green females from populations without large-green males invariably generated genotypically identical daughters by parthenogenesis, regardless of the presence or absence of males in the laboratory cultures. In contrast large-green females from a population that included large-green males, when they had the opportunity for fertilization, usually produced genotypically diverse offspring of both sexes. These females were probably sexually reproducing. Unmated females from the mixed-sex population did not reproduce. The small-brown morph was collected from a single water body in which it was represented by both sexes and co-occurred with large-green parthenogenetic females. Most of the small-brown females tested reproduced sexually in the presence of males or did not reproduce in the absence of males. One small-brown unmated female, however, reproduced by parthenogenesis. Available evidence indicates that the field population of the small-brown morph includes both sexual and parthenogenetic females and that the relative abundance of the parthenogenetic females is increasing with time. The sexual and asexual forms within and between morphs are probably independent.

Similar content being viewed by others

Tests for associations between sexual dimorphism and patterns of quantitative genetic variation in the water strider, Aquarius remigis

Article Open access 29 May 2023

Sex-specific morphs: the genetics and evolution of intra-sexual variation

Article 15 August 2022

Selection drives convergent gene expression changes during transitions to co-sexuality in haploid sexual systems

Article Open access 21 March 2022

Article PDF

References

  • Bauer, H. 1940. Über die Chromosonen der bisexuellen und der parthenogenetischen Rasse des Ostracoden Heterocypris incongruens Ramd. Chromosona, 1, 620–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. 1982. The Masterpiece of Nature: the Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birky, C W, and Gilbert, J J. 1971. Parthenogenesis in rotifers: the control of sexual and asexual reproduction. Am Zool, 11, 245–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brohnstein, Z S. 1988. Fresh-Water Ostracoda. Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, R M. 1971. Parthenogenesis in parasitic helminths. Am Zool, 11, 267–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, G R, and Hughes, R N. 1983. The effect of food availability, female culture-density and photoperiod on ephippia production in Daphnia magna Straus (Crustacea: Cladocera). Freshwater Biol, 13, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, J A, and Ayre, D J. 1989. Genetic evidence of variation in the contributions of sexual and asexual reproduction to populations of the freshwater ostracod Candonocypris novaezelandiae. Freshwater Biol, 22, 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Deckker, P. 1981. Ostracoda from Australian inland waters: notes on taxonomy and ecology. Proc R Soc Vict, 93, 45–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Deckker, P. 1983. Notes on the ecology and distribution of non-marine ostracods in Australia. Hydrobiologia, 106, 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Deckker, P, and Williams, W D. 1988. Physiochemical limnology of eleven, mostly saline permanent lakes in western Victoria, Australia. Hydrobiologia, 162, 275–286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eager, S H. 1971. A checklist of Ostracoda of New Zealand. J R Soc NZ, 1, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburger-Vogel, T, and Charniaux-Cotton, H. 1982. Sex determination. In: Abele, L. G. (ed.) The Biology of Crustacea, Academic Press, London, pp. 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosberg, R K. 1988. Life-history variation within a population of the colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri. 1. The genetic and environmental control of seasonal variation. Evolution, 42, 900–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harshman, L G, and Futuyma, D J. 1985. The origin and distribution of clonal diversity in Alsophila pometaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Evolution, 39, 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Harten, D. 1983. Resource competition as a possible cause of sex ratio in benthic ostracods. In: Maddocks, R. F. (ed.) Applications of Ostracoda, University of Houston Geosciences, Houston, pp. 568–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel, J E, and Hebert, P D N. 1989. Apomictic parthenogenesis and genotypic diversity in Cypridopsis vidua (Ostracoda: Cyprididae). Heredity, 62, 383–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havel, J E, Hebert, P D N, and Delorme, L D. 1990. Genetics of sexual Ostracoda from a low Arctic site. J Evol Biol, 3, 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert, P D N, and Crease, T. 1983. Clonal diversity in populations of Daphnia pulex reproducing by obligate parthenogenesis. Heredity, 51, 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, C C. 1942. The ostracods of Illinois, their biology and taxonomy, Il Biol Monogr, 19, 1–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussainy, S U. 1969. Description of the male of Candonocypris assimilis G. O. Sars 1894 (Cypridae, Ostracoda). Proc R Soc Vict, 82, 305–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R N. 1989. A Functional Biology of Clonal Animals. Chapman and Hall. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesling, R V. 1951. The morphology of ostracod moult stages Il Biol Monogr, 21, 1–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, K G. 1971. Palaeozoogeography of freshwater Ostracoda. In: Oertli, H. J. (ed.) Paléoécologie des Ostracodes Bull. Centre Rech. Pau-SNPA, 5, Suppl., 207–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennack, R W. 1953. Fresh-Water Invertebrates of the United States. Ronald Press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B J, Baverstock, P R, and Adams, M. 1986. Allozyme Electrophoresis. Academic Press. Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, V, and Menozzi, M. 1990. The clonal ecology of Heterocypris incongruens (Ostracoda). Oikos, 388–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sars, G O. 1889. On some freshwater Ostracoda and Copepoda raised from dried Australian mud. Fork Vidensk Selsk Krist, 8, 1–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sars, G O. 1894. Contributions to the knowledge of the freshwater Entomostraca of New Zealand as shown by artificial hatching from dried mud. Forh Vidensk-Selsk Krist, 5, 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, J A. 1983a. The accumulation of genetic variation in a parthenogenetic snail. Evolution, 37, 546–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, J A. 1983b. Asexual production of planulae in the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Mar Biol, 76, 279–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suomalainen, E, Saura, A, and Lokki, J. 1976. Evolution of parthenogenetic insects. Evol Biol, 9, 209–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetart, J. 1975. Recherches sur la reproduction et l' ecologie de quelques Ostracodes Cyprididae. Ph.D. Thesis, USM Grenoble.

  • White, M J D. 1973. Animal Cytology and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitham, T G, and Slobodchikoff, C N. 1981. Evolution by individuals, plant-herbivore interactions, and mosaics of genetic variability: the adaptive significance of somatic mutations in plants. Oecologia, 49, 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F, and Woolcock, L T. 1960. Temperature determination of sex in a parthenogenetic parasite, Ooencyrtus submetallicus (Howard) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Aust J Zool, 8, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgemuth, R. 1914. Beobachtungen und Untersuchungen über die Biologie der Süsswasserostracoden; ihr Vorkommen in Sachsen und Böhmen, ihre Lebensweise und ihre Fortpflanzung. Int Rev Hybrobiol, Biol Suppl., 6, 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Wollongong, PO Box 1144, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia

    J A Chaplin

Authors
  1. J A Chaplin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaplin, J. Variation in the mode of reproduction among individuals of the ostracod Candonocypris novaezelandiae. Heredity 68, 411–424 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.61

Download citation

  • Received: 13 May 1991

  • Issue date: 01 May 1992

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.61

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • allozymes
  • breeding trials
  • freshwater Ostracoda
  • parthenogenesis
  • sexual reproduction

This article is cited by

  • Clonal diversity in the ancient asexual ostracod Darwinula stevensoni assessed by RAPD-PCR

    • K Van Doninck
    • I Schön
    • T Backeljau

    Heredity (2004)

  • Genetic evidence of widespread dispersal in a parthenogenetic freshwater ostracod

    • J A Chaplin
    • D J Ayre

    Heredity (1997)

  • Genetic characterization of breeding systems, ploidy levels and species boundaries in Cypricercus (Ostracoda)

    • J Turgeon
    • P D N Hebert

    Heredity (1995)

  • Abundant asexuality in tropical freshwater ostracodes

    • Tom J Little
    • Paul D N Hebert

    Heredity (1994)

  • The local displacement of a sexually reproducing ostracod by a conspecific parthenogen

    • J A Chaplin

    Heredity (1993)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited