Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Genomic analysis in the genus Aegilops. I. Interspecific hybrids between tetraploid species sharing a common genome
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 January 1993

Genomic analysis in the genus Aegilops. I. Interspecific hybrids between tetraploid species sharing a common genome

  • N Cuñado1 

Heredity volume 70, pages 9–15 (1993)Cite this article

  • 499 Accesses

  • 8 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Hybrids between tetraploid Aegilops species sharing a common genome (U, D or C) were analysed at metaphase I by using a C-banding technique in order to establish genome relationships. In all cases it allowed discrimination between associations of chromosomes with similar morphology and C-banding belonging to the same genome (homomorphic associations) and associations involving different chromosomes (heteromorphic associations) and, in addition, it was possible to identify a given genome in most interspecific hybrids and, consequently, to analyse the different types of association between them. It was shown that in most cases the divergences between the shared genomes (U, D or C) in different tetraploid species of Aegilops are at present substantial despite their common origin. On the other hand, genomes present in the tetraploid Aegilops species mostly maintain patterns of evolutionary affinity similar to those reported for their putative diploid donors although, in some cases there are differences indicating either that modifications occurred during the evolution of the polyploid and/or diploid species or that the proposed diploid parents are not correct.

Similar content being viewed by others

Chromosome-scale and haplotype-resolved genome assembly of the autotetraploid Misgurnus anguillicaudatus

Article Open access 28 September 2024

Unifying framework explaining how parental regulatory divergence can drive gene expression in hybrids and allopolyploids

Article Open access 08 October 2024

A comparative genomic analysis at the chromosomal-level reveals evolutionary patterns of aphid chromosomes

Article Open access 13 March 2025

Article PDF

References

  • Cermeño, M C, Cuñado, N, and Orellana, J. 1985. Meiotic behaviour of Un, D and R genomes in the amphiploid Aegilops ventricosa-Secale cereale and the parental species. Theor Appl Genet, 70, 679–683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chennaveeriaiah, M S. 1960. Karyomorphologic and cyto-taxonomic studies in Aegilops. Acta Horn Gotoburgensis, 23, 85–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuñado, N. 1992. Analysis of metaphase I chromosome association in species of the genus Aegilops. Theor Appl Genet, (in press).

  • Cuñado, N, Cermeño, M C, and Orellana, J. 1986. Interactions between wheat, rye and Aegilops ventricosa chromosomes on homologous and homoeologous pairing. Heredity, 56, 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinasse, A, and Kimber, G. 1981. The analysis of meiosis in hybrids.IV. Pentaploid hybrids. Can J Genet Cytol, 23, 627–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg, O L, Miller, R A, and Ojima, K. 1968. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res, 50, 151–158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, B S, and Kimber, G. 1974. Giemsa C-banding and the evolution of wheat. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 71, 4086–4090.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Giraldez, R, Cermeño, M C, and Orellana, J. 1979. Comparison of C-banding pattern in the chromosomes of imbred lines and open pollinated varieties of rye, Secale cereale L. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg, 83, 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihara, H. 1954. Consideration on the evolution and distribution of Aegilops species based on the analyzer method. Cytologia, 19, 336–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, G, and Feldman, M. 1987. Wild wheats: an introduction. College of Agriculture, University of Missouri, Columbia MO., Special Report No. 353, pp. 114–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, G, Pignone, D, and Sallee, P J. 1983. The relationship of the M and Mu genomes of Triticum. Can J Genet Cytol, 25, 509–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, G, and Tsunewaki, K. 1988. Genome symbols and plasma types in the wheat group. Proc 7th Int Wheat Genet Symp, 12, 1209–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, G, and Yen, Y. 1989. Hybrids involving wheat relatives and autotetraploid Triticum umbellulatum. Genome, 32, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, G, and Zhao, Y H. 1983. The D genome of the Triticeae. Can J Genet Cytol, 25, 581–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, H, and Jahier, J. 1988. Phylogenetic relationships in some diploid species of Triticineae: cytogenetic analysis of interspecific hybrids. Theor Appl Genet, 75, 498–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, P E. 1986. Chromosome pairing in interspecific hybrids in genus Aegilops. Wheat Inf Serv, 61&62, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T E, and Riley, R. 1972. Meiotic chromosome pairing in wheat—rye combinations. Genet Iber, 24, 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T, and Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant, 15, 473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakai, Y. 1981. D genome donors for Aegilops cylindrica (CCDD) and Triticum aestivum (AABBDD) deduced from esterase isozyme analysis. Theor Appl Genet, 60, 11–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakai, Y, and Tsuji, S. 1984. A Polyacrylamide gel isoelectro-focusing study of acid phosphatase isozymes of Aegilops species with reference to their numerical taxonomy. Seiken Zihô, 32, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo, T, Lacadena, J R, and Giraldez, R. 1979. Interaction between wheat and rye genomes on homologous and homoeologous pairing. Z Pflanzenziichtg, 82, 289–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orellana, J, Vazquez, J F, and Carrillo, J M. 1989. Genome analysis in wheat—rye—Aegilops caudata trigeneric hybrids. Genome, 32, 169–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayburn, A L, and Gill, B S. 1987. Molecular basis of the D-genome of the Triticeae. Theor Appl Genet, 73, 385–388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, M. 1985. The relationships of the M and Mu genomes of Aegilops. Wheat Inf Serv, 60, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, S B, and Hutchinson, J. 1983. Interspecific variation in C-banded chromosomes of diploid Aegilops species. Theor Appl Genet, 65, 31–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y H, and Kimber, G. 1984. New hybrids with D genome wheat relatives. Genetics, 106, 509–515.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Professor J. R. Lacadena for his help in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departmento de Genética, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, E-28040, Spain

    N Cuñado

Authors
  1. N Cuñado
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cuñado, N. Genomic analysis in the genus Aegilops. I. Interspecific hybrids between tetraploid species sharing a common genome. Heredity 70, 9–15 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1993.2

Download citation

  • Received: 10 January 1992

  • Issue date: 01 January 1993

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1993.2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Aegilops
  • C-banding
  • chromosome associations at metaphase I
  • genomic analysis
  • interspecific hybrids

This article is cited by

  • Genomic analysis in the genus Aegilops. II. Interspecific hybrids between polyploid species sharing two common genomes

    • N Cuñado

    Heredity (1993)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited