Abstract
To understand fully the process of evolution of quantitative traits it is necessary to be able to estimate the genetic correlation and its associated standard error. At present, estimation methods are available only for relatively simple designs. An alternative procedure is to use the correlation of family means as an estimate of the genetic correlation. We evaluate the utility of the family mean method and that of the more general procedure, the jackknife. The family mean method is shown to be potentially very biased unless family sizes are very large (≈ 20), and therefore its general utility is questionable. However, the jackknife method does provide valid estimates of both the correlations (phenotypic and genetic) and their standard errors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Becker, W A. 1985. Manual of Quantitative Genetics. McNaughton and Gunn, Ann Arbor, MI.
Falconer, D S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn. Longman, New York.
Grossman, M, and Norton, H W. 1974. Simplification of the sampling variance of the correlation coefficients. Theor Appl Genet, 44, 332.
Hammond, K, and Nicholas, F W. 1972. The sampling variance of the correlation coefficients estimated from two-fold nested and offspring-parent regression analysis. Theor Appl Genet, 42, 97–100.
Klein, T W, Defries, J C, and Finkbeiner, C T. 1973. Heritability and genetic correlation: standard error of estimates and sample size. Behav Genet, 3, 355–364.
Lande, R, and Arnold, S J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37, 1210–1226.
Miller, R G. 1974. The jackknife — a review. Biometrika, 61, 1–15.
Mueller, L D. 1979. A comparison of two methods for making statistical inferences on Nei's measure of genetic distance. Biometrics, 35, 757–763.
Olausson, A, and Ronningen, K. 1975. Estimation of genetic parameters for threshold characters. Acta Agr Scand, 25, 201–208.
Potvin, C, and Roff, D A. 1993. Distribution-free and robust statistical methods: viable alternatives to parametric statistics? Ecology, 74, 1617–1628.
Reeve, E C R. 1955. The variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics, 11, 357–374.
Robertson, A. 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics, 15, 469–485.
Robertson, A. 1960. Experimental design on the measurement of heritabilities and genetic correlations. In: Kemp-thorne, O. (ed.) Biometrical Genetics, pp. 101–106. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Ronningen, T. 1974. Monte Carlo simulation of statistical-biological models which are of interest in animal breeding. Acta Agr Scand, 24, 135–142.
Simons, A M, and Roff, D A. 1994. The effect of environmental variability on the heritabilities of traits of a field cricket. Evolution (in press).
Sokal, R R, and Rohlf, F J. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Van Vleck, L D. 1968. Selection bias in estimation of the genetic correlation. Biometrics, 24, 951–962.
Van Vleck, L D, and Henderson, C R. 1961. Empirical sampling estimates of genetic correlations. Biometrics, 17, 359–371.
Via, S. 1984. The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. II. Genetic correlations in larval performance within and among host plants. Evolution, 38, 896–905.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roff, D., Preziosi, R. The estimation of the genetic correlation: the use of the jackknife. Heredity 73, 544–548 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.153
Received:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.153
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Genetic variation in compensatory feeding for dietary dilution in a generalist caterpillar
Scientific Reports (2017)
-
Few genetic and environmental correlations between life history and stress resistance traits affect adaptation to fluctuating thermal regimes
Heredity (2016)
-
Growth variations and heritabilities of teak CSO-derived families and provenances planted in two humid tropical sites
Tree Genetics & Genomes (2013)
-
Genetic architecture of fruit quality traits in Malus x domestica (Borkh.) compared between own-rooted seedlings and vegetative propagules on ‘M. 9’ rootstock
Tree Genetics & Genomes (2011)
-
Inbred decorated crickets exhibit higher measures of macroparasitic immunity than outbred individuals
Heredity (2010)
