Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Phenotypic plasticity in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae): genetic correlations across light regimens
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 February 1994

Phenotypic plasticity in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae): genetic correlations across light regimens

  • Stefan Andersson1 &
  • Ruth G Shaw2 

Heredity volume 72, pages 113–125 (1994)Cite this article

  • 981 Accesses

  • 45 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Inbred F3 and F4 families from a cross between two contrasting ecotypes of Crepis tectorum were replicated in two regimes in a glasshouse to determine whether genetic tradeoffs within the reaction norm favour genetic differentiation over phenotypic plasticity in this species. There was no tradeoff in reproductive fitness (flower production) across light regimes but genetic cross-environment correlations approached unity for a wide range of characters subject to divergent selection across habitats, suggesting little genetic variation in plasticity and a limited opportunity for selection to favour broadly adapted genotypes capable of attaining the optimum phenotype in every environment. The presence of genotype-environment interaction without large changes in the ranking of genotypes over light regimes indicates a greater potential for evolutionary change in environmental sensitivity although developmental constraints may limit the range of phenotypes that can be expressed in a character. A selection analysis was conducted to determine how the average reaction norm would evolve in this system. Whereas the relationship between each trait and reproductive fitness was environment-specific, there was no change in the direction of selection between light regimes. Given the genetic correlation structure observed, one would expect some of the genetic response in one environment to carry over to the other environment.

Similar content being viewed by others

Evidence of local adaptation despite strong drift in a Neotropical patchily distributed bromeliad

Article 05 May 2021

Natural selection on traits and trait plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana varies across competitive environments

Article Open access 10 December 2020

Incorporating evolutionary and threat processes into crop wild relatives conservation

Article Open access 21 October 2022

Article PDF

References

  • Andersson, S. 1989a. Phenotypic plasticity in Crépis tectorum (Asteraceae). Pl Syst Evol, 168, 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1989b. Life-history evolution in Crépis tectorum (Asteraceae). Oecologia (Berl), 80, 540–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1989c. The evolution of self-fertility in Crépis tectorum (Asteraceae). Pl Syst Evol, 168, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1990. A phenetic study of Crépis tectorum in Fennoscandia and Estonia. Nord J Bot, 9, 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1991. Geographical variation and genetic analysis of leaf shape in Crépis tectorum (Asteraceae). Pl Syst Evol, 178, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1992. Phenotypic selection in a population of Crépis tectorum ssp. pumila. Can J Bot, 70, 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1993. Morphometric differentiation, patterns of interfertility and the genetic basis of character evolution in Crépis tectorum (Asteraceae). Pl Syst Evol, 184, 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, M P, and Thomas, D L. 1990. Alternative formulations of the mixed-model ANOVA applied to quantitative genetics. Evolution, 44, 221–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, E B. 1947. The genus Crépis I–II. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

  • Bennett, A F, Dao, K M, and Lenski, R E. 1990. Rapid evolution in response to high-temperature selection. Nature, 346, 79–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Björkman, O, and Holmgren, P. 1963. Adaptability of the photosynthetic apparatus to light intensity in ecotypes from exposed and shaded habitats. Physiol Plant, 16, 889–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, A D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet, 13, 115–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. 1985. Mathematical Quantitative Genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, D O, Van Voorhees, D A, and Ehtisham, A. 1992. Sex ratio selection and the evolution of environmental sex determination in laboratory populations of Menidia menidia. Evolution, 46, 1722–1730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S A, and Johnson, M P. 1968. Adaptation to heterogeneous environments. I. Variation in heterophylly in Ranunculus flammula L. Evolution, 22, 496–516.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D S. 1952. The problem of environment and selection. Am Nat, 86, 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D S. 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D S. 1990. Selection in different environments: effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance. Genet Res, 56, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J D. 1990. Tradeoffs in fitness on different hosts: evidence from a selection experiment with a phytophagous mite. Am Nat, 136, 569–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J D. 1992. The mixed-model analysis of variance applied to quantitative genetics: biological meaning of the parameters. Evolution, 46, 540–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J D. 1993. The ‘general vigor’ problem: can antagonistic pleiotropy be detected when genetic covariances are positive? Evolution, 47, 327–333.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D J, and Moreno, G. 1988. The evolution of ecological specialization. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 19, 207–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, W, and Lynch, M. 1992. The selective advantage of reaction norms for environmental tolerance. J Evol Biol, 5, 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomulkiewicz, R, and Kirkpatrick, M. 1992. Quantitative genetics and the evolution of reaction norms. Evolution, 46, 390–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A P, and Lewontin, R C. 1982. A study of reaction norms in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution, 36, 934–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, J C. 1972. Environmental unpredictability and plastic energy allocation strategies in the annual Polygonum cascadeuse (Polygonaceae). J Ecol, 63, 689–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, R R. 1973. A discussion of the two-way mixed model. Am Statist, 27, 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M Akram, and Bradshaw, A D. 1976. Adaptation to heterogeneous environments. II. Phenotypic plasticity in response to spacing in Linum. Aust J Agric Res, 27, 519–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M, Akram Antonovics, J, and Bradshaw, A D. 1976. Adaptation to heterogeneous environments. III. The inheritance of response to spacing in Flax and Linseed (Linum usitatissimum). Aust J Agric Res, 27, 649–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, E P, Real, L, Antonovics, J, and Heckel, D G. 1983. Variance models in the study of life histories. Am Nat, 122, 114–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R, and Arnold, S J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37, 1210–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K, and Jinks, J L. 1982. Biometrical Genetics, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazer, S J, and Schick, C T. 1991. Constancy of population parameters for life history and floral traits in Raphanus sativus L. 1. Norms of reaction and the nature of genotype by environment interactions. Heredity, 67, 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T E, and Schemske, D W. 1990. An experimental study of competitive performance in Brassica rapa (Cruciferae). Am J Bot, 11, 993–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, H A. 1980. Photosynthetic plasticity of populations of Heliotropium curassavicum L. originating from differing thermal regimes. Oecologia (Berl), 45, 372–376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Najda, H O, Darwent, A L, and Hamilton, G. 1982. The biology of Canadian weeds 54. Crépis tectorum Can J Plant Sci, 62, 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, R A. 1988. Adaptive plasticity in development of Scaphiopus couchii tadpoles in desert ponds. Evolution, 42, 774–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platenkamp, G A J, and Shaw, R G. 1992. Environmental and genetic constraints on adaptive population differentiation in Anthoxanthum odoratum. Evolution, 46, 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics, 15, 469–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M R. 1984. Genetic covariation in Drosophila life history: Untangling the data. Am Nat, 123, 565–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS. 1985. SAS Users Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC USA.

  • Scheiner, S M, and Lyman, R F. 1989a. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. I. Heritability. J Evol Biol, 2, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, S M, and Lyman, R F. 1989b. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. II. Response to selection. J Evol Biol, 3, 23–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting, C D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 17, 667–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting, C D, and Levin, D A. 1990. Phenotypic plasticity in Phlox. III. Variation among natural population of P. drummondii. J Evol Biol, 3, 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, I I. 1949. Factors of Evolution. Blakeston, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, J, Niles, J, and Wulff, R D. 1992. Norms of reaction of seed traits to maternal environments in Plantago lanceolata. Am Nat, 139, 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Service, P M, and Rose, M R. 1985. Genetic covariation among life-history components: the effect of novel environments. Evolution, 39, 943–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R G. 1986. Response to density in a wild population of the perennial herb Salvia lyrata: variation among families. Evolution, 40, 492–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R G, and Platenkamp, G A J. 1993. Quantitative genetics of competitive ability in Nemophila menziesii. Evolution, 47, 801–812.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S C. 1989. The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. Bioscience, 39, 436–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G L. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultan, S E. 1987. Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Evol Biol, 21, 127–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trexler, J C, and Travis, J. 1990. Phenotypic plasticity in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna (Pisces: Poeciliidae). I. Field experiments. Evolution, 44, 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tienderen, P H. 1991. Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments. Evolution, 45, 1317–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Via, S. 1984a. The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. I. Genotype-environment interaction in larval performance on different host plant species. Evolution, 38, 881–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Via, S. 1984b. The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. II. Genetic correlations in larval performance within and among host plants. Evolution, 38, 896–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Via, S. 1991. The genetic structure of host plant adaptation in a spatial patchwork: demographic variability among reciprocally transplanted pea aphid clones. Evolution, 45, 827–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Via, S, and Lande, R. 1985. Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution, 39, 505–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C H. 1959. Canalization of development and genetic assimilation of acquired characters. Nature, 183, 1654–1655.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weis, A E, and Gorman, W L. 1990. Measuring selection on reaction norms: an exploration of the Eurosta-Solidago system. Evolution, 44, 820–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerman, J M. 1970. Genotype-environment interaction and developmental regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. TV. Wild material: analysis. Heredity, 26, 383–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada, Y. 1962. Genotype by environment interaction and genetic correlation of the same trait under different environments. Jpn J Genet, 37, 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, C A. 1976. Growth characteristics of weediness in Portulaca oleracea. Ecology, 57, 964–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Systematic Botany, University of Lund, Ö. Vallgatan 18–20, Lund, S-223 61, Sweden

    Stefan Andersson

  2. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, 100 Ecology Building, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, University of Minneapolis/St. Paul, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA

    Ruth G Shaw

Authors
  1. Stefan Andersson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruth G Shaw
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersson, S., Shaw, R. Phenotypic plasticity in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae): genetic correlations across light regimens. Heredity 72, 113–125 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.17

Download citation

  • Received: 24 May 1993

  • Issue date: 01 February 1994

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.17

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Genotype-environment interaction
  • phenotypic plasticity
  • reaction norm
  • tradeoffs

This article is cited by

  • Genetic structure and genetic diversity of the endangered grassland plant Crepis mollis (Jacq.) Asch. as a basis for conservation management in Germany

    • Virginia K. Duwe
    • Ludo A. H. Muller
    • Sascha A. Ismail

    Conservation Genetics (2018)

  • Detecting small environmental differences: risk-response curves for predator-induced behavior and morphology

    • Nancy M. Schoeppner
    • Rick A. Relyea

    Oecologia (2008)

  • Modelling phenotypic plasticity. II. Do genetic correlations matter?

    • Massimo Pigliucci

    Heredity (1996)

  • Genetic correlations and reaction norms in wing pattern of the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana

    • Jack J Windig

    Heredity (1994)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited