Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Quantitative genetics of mating system divergence in the yellow monkeyflower species complex
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 October 1994

Quantitative genetics of mating system divergence in the yellow monkeyflower species complex

  • Charles B Fenster1 &
  • Kermit Ritland1 

Heredity volume 73, pages 422–435 (1994)Cite this article

  • 1092 Accesses

  • 112 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

To study the genetic basis of phenotypic changes in floral characters associated with mating system divergence in the yellow monkeyflowers (Mimulus, section Simiolus), all pairwise crosses were conducted between four taxa, of which two were independently evolved inbreeders. The effective number of genetic factors differentiating taxa for each of six characters was estimated from back-cross and F2 segregation variances, using a model that incorporates dominance. The number of factors, averaged over taxa pairs, ranged from 5.3 (for stigma-anther separation) to 12.8 (for pistil length). Dominance was slight to moderate for most characters, with a slight bias for inbreeding characteristics to be dominant over outbreeding traits. F2 segregation patterns indicate strong genetic correlations among floral size characters but variable correlation of these characters with flowering time and little correlation with stigma-anther separation. Crosses between the two selfing and two outcrossing taxa did not lead to the recovery of extreme transgressive segregants in the F2. These results suggest that either homologous loci are involved in repeated shifts to selfing or that the likelihood of appearance of novel recombinations is limited by the large number of loci, each with small effect. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of recent models of mating system evolution.

Similar content being viewed by others

Testing the evolutionary theory of inversion polymorphisms in the yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus)

Article Open access 29 November 2024

Reproductive strategies and their consequences for divergence, gene flow, and genetic diversity in three taxa of Clarkia

Article 12 September 2023

A primary study of breeding system of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa

Article Open access 14 May 2021

Article PDF

References

  • Ambros, V. 1988. Genetic basis for heterochronic variation. In: McKinney, M. L. (ed.) Heterochrony in Evolution, pp. 269–285. Plenum Press, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Breese, E L. 1959. Selection for differing degrees of outbreeding in Nicotiana rustica. Ann Bot, 23, 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D R. 1989. Measurements of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in male and female pollination success. Evolution, 43, 318–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G R. 1950. Mimulus guttatus and related species. ElAliso, 2, 319–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D E, and Fenster, C B. 1994. Levels of genetic variation and covariation for Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae) floral traits. Heredity, 72, 606–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. 1992. Evolutionary rates in partially fertilizing species. Am Nat, 140, 126–148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, D, Morgan, M T, and Charlesworth, B. 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution, 44, 1469–1489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, M T, and Epperson, B K. 1988. Natural selection of flower color polymorphisms in morning glory populations. In Gottlieb, L. D. and Jain, S. K. (eds) Plant Evolutionary Biology, pp. 255–273. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham, C C. 1986. Modifications in estimating the number of genes for a quantitative character. Genetics, 114, 659–664.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J A, and Lande, R. 1985. The genetic basis of species differences in plants. Am Nat, 126, 141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dole, J A. 1992. Reproductive assurance mechanisms in three taxa of the Mimulus guttatus complex (Scropulariaceae). Am J Bot, 79, 650–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B, and Gong, G. 1983. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife and cross-validation. Am Stat, 37, 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epperson, B K, and Clegg, M T. 1987. Frequency-dependent variation for outcrossing rate among flower-color morphs of Ipomoeapurpurea. Evolution, 41, 1302–1311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D S. 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenster, C B, and Barrett, S C H. 1994. Inheritance of mating-system modifier genes in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Heredity, 72, 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenster, C B, and Ritland, K. 1992. Chloroplast DNA and isozyme diversity in two Mimulus species (Scrophulariaceae) with contrasting mating systems. Am J Bot, 79, 1440–1447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fenster, C B, and Ritland, K. 1994. Evidence for natural selection on mating system in Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Int J Pl Sci, in press.

  • Fisher, R A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann Eugen, 11, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L D. 1984. Genetics and morphological evolution in plants. Am Nat, 123, 681–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A L. 1924. A monograph of the genus Mimulus. Ann Mo Bot Gard, II, 99–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V. 1981. Plant Speciation. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J B S. 1927. A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. V. Selection and mutation. Proc Camb Phil Soc, 23, 838–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger, K E. 1988. Inbreeding depression doesn't matter: the genetic basis of mating system evolution. Evolution, 42, 1235–1244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger, K E. 1991. Inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems. Trends Ecol Evol, 6, 307–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger, K E, Feldman, M W, and Christiansen, R B. 1984. The evolution of self-fertilization in plants. A population genetic model. Am Nat, 124, 446–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtsford, T P, and Ellstrand, N C. 1992. Genetic and environmental variation in floral traits affecting outcrossing rate in Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). Evolution, 46, 216–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, M O, and Nicholls, M K. 1984. Relationships between tolerance to heavy metals in Agrostis capillaris (A. tenuis Sibth.). NewPhytol, 98, 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husband, B C, and Barrett, S C H. 1993. Multiple origins of self-fertilization in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): inferences from style morph and isozyme variation. J Evol Biol, 6, 591–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacser, H, and Burns, J A. 1981. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics, 97, 639–666.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1981. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics, 99, 541–553.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Latta, R, and Ritland, K. 1993. Models of the evolution of selfing under alternative models of-inheritance. Heredity, 71, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latta, R, and Ritland, K. 1994. The relationship between inbreeding depression and prior inbreeding among populations of four Mimulus taxa. Evolution, 48, in press.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D G. 1965. Evolution of self-compatibility and racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contr Gray Herb, 195, 3–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, E M, and Hill, J P. 1987. Evidence for heterochrony in the evolution of plant form. In: Raff, R. A. and Raff, E. C. (eds) Development as an Evolutionary Process, pp. 47–70. Alan R. Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnair, M R. 1989. A new species of Mimulus endemic to copper mines in California. Bot J Linn Soc, 100, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macnair, M R, and Cumbes, Q I. 1989. The genetic architecture of interspecific variation in Mimulus. Genetics, 122, 211–222.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D F, and Abbott, R J. 1982. Polymorphism for outcrossing frequency at the ray floret locus in Senecio vulgaris L. I. Evidence. Heredity, 48, 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D F, and Abbott, R J. 1984. Polymorphism for outcrossing frequency at the ray floret locus in Senecio vulgaris L. II. Confirmation. Heredity, 52, 331–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K, and Jinks, J L. 1982. Biometrical Genetics, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D M, and Lewis, H. 1965. The evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana. Evolution, 19, 104–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff, R. 1969. Reproductive biology in relation to systematics. Taxon, 18, 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J H, and Barrett, S C H. 1992. The development of heterostyly. In: Barrett, S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and Function of Heterostyly, pp. 85–127. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ritland, C, and Ritland, K. 1989. Variation of sex allocation among eight species of the Mimulus guttatus complex. Am J Bot, 76, 1731–1739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritland, K. 1991. A genetic approach to measuring pollen discounting in natural populations. Am Nat, 138, 1049–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R C. 1963. The evolution and systematics of Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contr Gray Herb, 192, 3–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhney, V K. 1992. Floral mutants in tomato: development, physiology and evolutionary implications. Can J Bot, 70, 701–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, J S, and Barrett, S C H. 1990. Quantitative genetics of floral characters in homostylous Turnera ulmifolia var. angustiflora Willd. (Turneraceae). Heredity, 64, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solbrig, O T, and Rollins, R C. 1977. Breeding system and genetic variation in Leavenworthia. Evolution, 26, 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G L. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uyenoyama, M K, and Waller, D M. 1991a. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Mutation-selection balance at one and two loci. Theor Pop Biol, 40, 14–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uyenoyama, M K, and Waller, D M. 1991b. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. II. Symmetric overdominance in viability. Theor Pop Biol, 40, 46–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uyenoyama, M K, and Waller, D M. 1991c. Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. III. Homozygous lethal mutations at multiple loci. Theor Pop Biol, 40, 173–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, R K. 1978. Case studies in the evolution of species complexes in Mimulus. Evol Biol, 11, 405–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1968. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol 1 Genetic and Biometrie Foundations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, R. 1988. Phylogenetic aspects of the evolution of self-pollination. In: Gottlieb, L. D. and Jain, S. K. (eds) Plant Evolutionary Biology, pp. 109–131. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Z B, Houle, D, and Cockerham, C C. 1990. How informative is Wright's estimator of the number of genes affecting a quantitative character? Genetics, 126, 235–247.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5S 3B2, Canada

    Charles B Fenster & Kermit Ritland

Authors
  1. Charles B Fenster
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kermit Ritland
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fenster, C., Ritland, K. Quantitative genetics of mating system divergence in the yellow monkeyflower species complex. Heredity 73, 422–435 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.190

Download citation

  • Received: 01 March 1994

  • Issue date: 01 October 1994

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.190

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • gene number
  • mating system
  • Mimulus
  • quantitative genetics

This article is cited by

  • Estimation of the F2 generation segregation variance and relationships among growth, frost damage, and bud break in coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) wide-crosses

    • Andy Benowicz
    • Michael Stoehr
    • Alvin D. Yanchuk

    Annals of Forest Science (2020)

  • Patterns of Phytochemical Variation in Mimulus guttatus (Yellow Monkeyflower)

    • Liza M. Holeski
    • Ken Keefover-Ring
    • Richard L. Lindroth

    Journal of Chemical Ecology (2013)

  • Mapping unexplored genomes II: genetic architecture of species differences in the woody Sonchus alliance (Asteraceae) in the Macaronesian Islands

    • Seung-Chul Kim

    Journal of Plant Research (2012)

  • Mimulus is an emerging model system for the integration of ecological and genomic studies

    • C A Wu
    • D B Lowry
    • J H Willis

    Heredity (2008)

  • Testing the rare-alleles model of quantitative variation by artificial selection

    • John K. Kelly

    Genetica (2007)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited