Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Reproductive isolation between two species of flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum and T. freemani: variation within and among geographical populations of T. castaneum
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 February 1994

Reproductive isolation between two species of flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum and T. freemani: variation within and among geographical populations of T. castaneum

  • Michael J Wade1 &
  • Norman A Johnson1 

Heredity volume 72, pages 155–162 (1994)Cite this article

  • 1291 Accesses

  • 47 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Tribolium castaneum and T. freemani produce sterile hybrid progeny in reciprocal crosses. The reciprocal crosses differ significantly in the mean numbers of progeny, progeny sex ratios, hybrid male body size and male antennal and leg morphologies. These results suggest an effect of either the X chromosome or the cytoplasm on characteristics of F1 hybrids. In contrast, large X chromosome effects on morphological traits are not usually oberved in interspecific crosses among drosophilid flies. We also report large, significant differences in progeny numbers, body mass and degree of female bias in sex ratio between different geographic strains of T. castaneum when mated in reciprocal crosses with T. freemani. Sex ratio bias also varies significantly among matings within geographic strains of T. castaneum. When T. castaneum males are mated with T. freemani females, but not in the reciprocal cross, the F1 sex ratio is female biased, uncorrelated with family size and ranges from 57.14 per cent to 72.23 per cent female, depending on the geographic strain of the T. castaneum male.

Similar content being viewed by others

Two novel genomes of fireflies with different degrees of sexual dimorphism reveal insights into sex-biased gene expression and dosage compensation

Article Open access 27 July 2024

Towards a universal understanding of sex ratio in termites

Article Open access 10 March 2025

Conserved chromatin and repetitive patterns reveal slow genome evolution in frogs

Article Open access 17 January 2024

Article PDF

References

  • Bock, I R. 1984. Interspecific hybridizations in the genus Drosophila. Evol Biol, 18, 41–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, A, and Sokoloff, A. 1988. Transmission of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) mutants to T. castaneum-T. freemani Hinton hybrids (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J Stored Prod Res, 24, 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H L. 1975. The genetics of speciation at the diploid level. Am Nat, 109, 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B, Coyne, J A, and Barton, N H. 1987. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am Nat, 130, 113–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J A. 1974. The evolution of hybrid inviability. Evolution, 28, 505–506.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J A. 1985. Genetic studies of three sibling species of Drosophila with relation to theories of speciation. Genet Res, 46, 169–192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J A. 1992a. Genetics of sexual isolation in females of the Drosophila simulans species complex. Genet Res, 60, 25–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J A. 1992b. Genetics and speciation. Nature, 355, 511–515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J A. 1993. The genetics of an isolating mechanism between two sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution, 47, 778–788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J A, and Orr, H A. 1989a. Two rules of speciation. In: Otte, D. and Endler, J. (eds) Speciation and its Consequences, pp. 180–207. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J A, and Orr, H A. 1989b. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution, 43, 362–381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J A, Orr, H A, and Futuyma, D J. 1988. Do we need a new species concept? Syst Zool, 37, 190–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J F. 1942. Cross fertility and isolating mechanisms in the Drosophila mulleri group. University of Texas Publication 4228, pp. 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J B S. 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J Genet, 12, 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, H E. 1948. A synopsis of the genus Tribolium MacLeay, with some remarks on the evolution of its species-groups (Coleoptera: Tenebronidae). Bull Ent Res, 39, 13–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, P, Roote, J, and Ashburner, M. 1990. A genetic basis for the inviability of hybrids between sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics, 124, 909–920.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N A, and Wu, C I. 1993. Evolution of postulating reproductive isolation: measuring the fitness effects of chromosomal regions containing hybrid male sterility factors. Am Nat, 134, 213–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, D E, and Wade, M J. 1980. Group selection: the phenotypic and genotypic differentiation of small populations. Evolution, 34, 813–821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nakakita, H, Imura, O, and Winks, R G. 1981. Hybridization between Tribolium freemani (Hinton) and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and some preliminary studies on the biology of Tribolium freemani (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Appl Ent Zool, 16, 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M, Maruyama, T, and Wu, C-I. 1983. Models of evolution of reproductive isolation. Genetics, 103, 557–579.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, H A. 1993. Haldane's rule has multiple genetic causes. Nature, 361, 532–533.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park, T. 1933. Studies in population physiology. II. Factors regulating initial growth of Tribolium confusum populations. Exp Zool, 65, 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, T, Leslie, P H, and Mertz, D B. 1964. Genetic strains and competition in populations of Tribolium. Phys Zool, 37, 97–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L. 1993. Haldane's rule and the hazards of heterogametity. Curr Biol, 3, 56–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawamura, K, Taira, T, and Watanabe, T K. 1993. Hybrid lethal systems in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. I. The maternal hybrid rescue (mhr) gene of Drosophila simulans. Genetics, 133, 299–305.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sawamura, K, Yamomoto, M-T, and Watanabe, T K. 1993b. Hybrid lethal systems in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. II. The Zygotic lethal rescue gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 133, 307–313.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, A. 1974. The Biology of Tribolium, 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, O C. 1991. The genetic basis of a species-specific character in the Drosophila virilis species group. Genetics, 128, 331–337.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A R. 1977. Analysis of head shape differences between two interfertile species of Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution, 31, 630–641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A R. 1980. The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Generics, 94, 1011–1038.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M J. 1977. An experimental study of group selection. Evolutional, 134–153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M J, and Beeman, R. 1994. The population dynamics of maternal-effect selfish genes. Genetics (in press).

  • Wade, M J, Patterson, H, Chang, N, and Johnson, N A. 1994. Postcopulatory, prezygotic isolation in flour beetles. Heredity, 72, 163–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, T K. 1979. A gene that rescues the lethal hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Jpn J Genet, 52, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C I. 1992. A note on Haldane's rule: Hybrid stability versus hybrid inviability. Evolution, 46, 1584–1587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C I, and Davis, A W. 1993. The composite nature of Haldane's rule and its genetic bases. Am Nat, 134, 189–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolution, 1101 E. 57th Street, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

    Michael J Wade & Norman A Johnson

Authors
  1. Michael J Wade
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Norman A Johnson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wade, M., Johnson, N. Reproductive isolation between two species of flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum and T. freemani: variation within and among geographical populations of T. castaneum. Heredity 72, 155–162 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.22

Download citation

  • Received: 14 June 1993

  • Issue date: 01 February 1994

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.22

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • hybrid inviability
  • genetic variation
  • morphology
  • reproductive isolation
  • speciation
  • Tribolium

This article is cited by

  • Tribolium beetles as a model system in evolution and ecology

    • Michael D. Pointer
    • Matthew J. G. Gage
    • Lewis G. Spurgin

    Heredity (2021)

  • Establishment of F1 hybrid mortality in real time

    • Ashley Saulsberry
    • Marisa Pinchas
    • Robert M. Brucker

    BMC Evolutionary Biology (2017)

  • Sperm competition and offspring viability at hybridization in Australian tree frogs, Litoria peronii and L. tyleri

    • C D H Sherman
    • E Wapstra
    • M Olsson

    Heredity (2010)

  • Current reproductive isolation between ancestors of natural hybrids in Bacillus stick insects (Insecta: Phasmatodea)

    • Barbara Mantovani
    • Fausto Tinti
    • Valerio Scali

    Heredity (1996)

  • Incipient speciation in the flour beetle, Tribolium confusum: premating isolation between natural populations

    • Michael J Wade
    • Nancy W Chang
    • Michael Mcnaughton

    Heredity (1995)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited