Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Genotype-specific habitat selection for oviposition sites in the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 April 1994

Genotype-specific habitat selection for oviposition sites in the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii

  • J S F Barker1,
  • William T Starmer2 &
  • James C Fogleman3 

Heredity volume 72, pages 384–395 (1994)Cite this article

  • 766 Accesses

  • 23 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Isofemale lines of the cactophilic species, Drosophila buzzatii, exhibit genetic variation for their oviposition response to cactus yeast species in the laboratory. In general, interactions between yeast species preclude the use of pairwise preferences as predictors of preferences in three-way choice experiments. Two isofemale lines with relatively high laboratory preference for ovipositing on the yeast Pichia cactophila (as opposed to Cryptococcus cereanus) and two isofemale lines with relatively low preference for P. cactophila were used in a series of field release experiments to determine if laboratory preferences were also realized under field conditions. The influence of yeast species on both settling behaviour (long-distance response) and oviposition preference (short-distance response) were tested. The four lines were identical in their settling behaviour, preferring P. cactophila. The analysis of the oviposition preference tests showed significant line effects which correlated with the laboratory results. Thus a genetic component for oviposition preference under laboratory and field conditions was demonstrated and this strengthens the evidence for genotype-specific habitat selection in D. buzzatii. One low line, however, did not differ significantly from the two high lines under field conditions. A laboratory retest of this low line showed that the laboratory preference had not changed. The reason for the difference in the two situations is unknown but undoubtedly is attributable to uncontrolled variables under the field situation. Settling behaviour and oviposition response, in general, appear to be proximately linked to differences in the volatiles produced by the different yeast species.

Similar content being viewed by others

Integrative characterization of genetic and phenotypic differentiation in an ant species complex with strong hierarchical population structure and low dispersal abilities

Article 30 December 2022

The loci of environmental adaptation in a model eukaryote

Article Open access 06 July 2024

Population genomics reveals how 5 ka of human occupancy led the Lima leaf-toed gecko (Phyllodactylus sentosus) to the brink of extinction

Article Open access 27 October 2023

Article PDF

References

  • Armstrong, T P. 1992. Olfaction and habitat selection in Drosophila buzzatii. Ph.D Thesis, University of New England, Armidale.

  • Barker, J S F. 1992. Genetic variation in cactophilic Drosophila for oviposition on natural yeast substrates. Evolution, 46, 1070–1083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J S F, East, P D, Phaff, H J, and Miranda, M. 1984. The ecology of the yeast flora in necrotic Opuntia cacti and of associated Drosophila in Australia. Microbial Ecol, 10, 379–399.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J S F, Starmer, W T, and Vacek, D C. 1987. Analysis of spatial and temporal variation in the community structure of yeasts associated with decaying Opuntia cactus. Microbial Ecol, 14, 267–276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J S R, Toll, G L, East, P D, Miranda, M, and Phaff, H J. 1983. Heterogeneity of the yeast flora in the breeding sites of cactophilic Drosophila. Can J Microbiol, 29, 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H L, and Ohta. A T. 1981. Origin of the genetic basis of colonizing ability. In: Scudder, G. G. E. and Reveal, J. L. (eds) Evolution Today, pp. 365–370. Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, S P, and Chen, G K. 1988. Genetic and environmental variation in oviposition behavior in the mycophagous Drosophila suboccidentalis Spcr. Funct Ecol, 2, 521–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, S R, and Bush, G L. 1989. The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation. In: Ott, D. and Endler, J. A. (eds) Speciation and its Consequences, pp. 345–365. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellows, D P, and Heed, W B. 1972. Factors affecting host plant selection in desert-adapted cactiphilic Drosophila. Ecology, 53, 850–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogleman, J C. 1982. The role of volatiles in the ecology of cactophilic Drosophila. In: Barker, J. S. F. and Starmer, W. T. (eds) Ecological Genetics and Evolution The Cactus-Yeast-Drosophila Model System, pp. 191–206. Academic Press Australia, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogleman, J C, and Abril, J R. 1990. Ecological and evolutionary importance of host plant chemistry. In: Barker, J. S. E, Sarmer, W. T. and Maclntyre, R. J. (eds) Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila, pp. 121–143. Plenum, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • García-Dorado, A. 1986. The effect of niche preference on polymorphism protection in a heterogeneous environment. Evolution, 40, 936–945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • García-Dorado, A. 1987. Polymorphism from environmental heterogeneity: some features of genetically induced niche preference. Theor Pop Biol, 32, 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffing, B. 1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci, 9, 463–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, P W. 1990a. Genotypic-specific habitat selection: a new model and its application. Heredity, 65, 145–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, P W. 1990b. Theoretical analysis of habitat selection and the maintenance of genetic variation. In: Barker, J. S. F., Starmer, W. T. and Maclntyre, R. J. (eds) Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila, pp. 209–227. Plenum, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heed, W B. 1971. Host plant specificity and speciation in Hawaiian Drosophila. Taxon, 20, 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, A A, and Parsons, P A. 1988. The analysis of quantitative variation in natural populations with isofemale strains. Génét Sél Évol, 20, 87–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, A A, Parsons, P A, and Nielsen, K M. 1984. Habitat selection: olfactory response of Drosophila melanogaster depends on resources. Heredity, 53, 139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike, J. 1985. Genetic and environmental determinants of food preference in Drosophila tripunctata. Evolution, 39, 362–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike, J. 1986. Genetic complexity of host-selection behavior in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 83, 2148–2151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike, J, and Holt, R D. 1991. Genetic variation for habitat preference: evidence and explanations. Am Nat, 137, S67–S90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaczko, L B, Taylor, C E, and Powell, J R. 1986. Genetic variation for dispersal by Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophilapersimilis. Genetics, 112, 229–235.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lofdahl, K L. 1986. A genetic analysis of habitat selection in the cactophilic species, Drosophila mojavensis. Huettel, M. D. (ed.) Evolutionary Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior, pp. 153–162. Plenum, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1970. Genetic polymorphism in a varied environment. Am Nat, 104, 487–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G A. (ed.) 1991. Habitat selection. Am Nat, 137, S1–S130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raushek, M D. 1984. The evolution of habitat preference in subdivided populations. Evolution, 38, 596–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M L. (ed.) 1987. Habitat selection and evolutionary processes. Evol Ecol, 1, 283–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R R, and Rohlf, F J. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starmer, W T, and Barker, J S F. 1986. Ecological genetics of the Adh-1 locus of Drosophila buzzatii. Biol J Linn Soc, 28, 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C E. 1976. Genetic variation in heterogeneous environments. Genetics, 83, 887–894.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, A R, and Rothman, E D. 1981. Evolution in finegrained environments. II. Habitat selection as a homeostatic mechanism. Theor Pop Biol, 19, 326–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia

    J S F Barker

  2. Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, 13244, NY, USA

    William T Starmer

  3. Department of Biology, University of Denver, Denver, 80208, CO, USA

    James C Fogleman

Authors
  1. J S F Barker
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William T Starmer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James C Fogleman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barker, J., Starmer, W. & Fogleman, J. Genotype-specific habitat selection for oviposition sites in the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii. Heredity 72, 384–395 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.55

Download citation

  • Received: 05 October 1993

  • Issue date: 01 April 1994

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.55

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • cactophilic yeasts
  • Drosophila buzzatii
  • Drosophila-yeast interactions
  • genetic variation
  • habitat selection
  • oviposition preference

This article is cited by

  • Behaviour genetics ofDrosophila: Non-sexual behaviour

    • Seema Sisodia
    • B. N. Singh

    Journal of Genetics (2005)

  • Size-related sexual selection and yeast diet inDrosophila buzzatii (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

    • Fabian M. Norry
    • Juan C. Vilardi

    Journal of Insect Behavior (1996)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited