Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Gene–environment interaction for body size and larval density in Drosophila melanogaster: an investigation of effects on development time, thorax length and adult sex ratio
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 May 1994

Gene–environment interaction for body size and larval density in Drosophila melanogaster: an investigation of effects on development time, thorax length and adult sex ratio

  • Mauro Santos1,2,
  • Kevin Fowler1 nAff3 &
  • Linda Partridge1 nAff3 

Heredity volume 72, pages 515–521 (1994)Cite this article

  • 2040 Accesses

  • 77 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

We measured the effect of larval density on thorax length, development time, sex ratio and a measure of total fitness, using strains of Drosophila melanogaster artificially selected for increased thorax length, control lines otherwise cultured in an identical way, and the base stock from which the lines had been derived. We used the addition experimental design (Mather & Caligari, 1981). No genotype–environment interaction was observed when comparing the reduction in thorax length of ‘large’ and ‘control’ lines with increasing larval density for any culture series, i.e. rank ordering of genotypes and additive genetic variances remained the same in all the environments tested. In contrast, the reduction in thorax length for the base stock as density increased was proportionally smaller than that of the ‘large’ and ‘control’ lines. Development time increased more rapidly with larval density in the ‘large’ lines than in the ‘controls’ or base stock. Sex ratio was unaffected by larval density but thorax length and the development time of females were more affected than those of males by increasing larval density. The estimate of total fitness showed clear evidence of gene–environment interaction for the effect of body size on fitness, with genetically large individuals at an increasing disadvantage with increasing larval density.

Similar content being viewed by others

Multifaceted and extensive behavioral trajectories of genomically diverse Drosophila lines

Article Open access 07 March 2025

A life-history allele of large effect shortens developmental time in a wild insect population

Article 13 November 2023

cis- and trans-regulatory contributions to a hierarchy of factors influencing gene expression variation

Article Open access 25 November 2024

Article PDF

References

  • Alpatov, W W. 1929. Growth and variation of the larvae of Drosophila melanogaster J Exp Zool, 42, 407–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, W D. 1979. A field investigation of larval competition in domestic Drosophila. J Anim Ecol, 48, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, W D. 1985. Coexistence of Australian rain forest Diptera breeding in a fallen fruit. J Anim Ecol, 54, 507–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashburner, M, and Thompson, J N. 1978. The laboratory culture of Drosophila. In: Ashburner, M. and Wright, T. R. F. (eds) The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, 2a, pp. 1–109. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, K. 1959. Feeding period, growth and pupation in larvae of Drosophila melanogaster Ent Exp Appl, 2, 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, K. 1961. An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster Arch Need Zool, 14, 200–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierbaum, T J, Mueller, L D, and Ayala, F J. 1989. Density-dependent evolution of life-history traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 43, 382–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botella, L M, Moya, A, Gonzalez, M C, and Mensua, J L. 1985. Larval stop, delayed development and survival in overcrowded cultures of Drosophila melanogaster. Effect of urea and uric acid. J Insect Physiol, 31, 179–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Budnik, M, and Brncic, D. 1976. Effects of larval biotic residues on viability of four species of Drosophila. Evolution, 29, 777–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnet, B, Sewell, D, and Bos, M. 1977. Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Growth relations and competition between selected lines. Genet Res, 30, 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caligari, P D S. 1980. Competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Monocultures. Heredity, 45, 219–231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Church, R B, and Robertson, F W. 1966. Biochemical analysis of genetic differences in the growth of Drosophila melanogaster Genet Res, 1, 385–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, L C. 1954. The population consequences of life history phenomena. Q Rev Biol, 19, 103–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J A, and Beecham, E. 1987. Heritability of two morphological characters within and among natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, 117, 727–737.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawood, M M, and Strickberger, M W. 1969. The effects of larval interaction on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Effects of biotic residues. Genetics, 63, 213–220.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Miranda, J R, and Eggleston, P. 1987. A comparison of substitution and addition design for the analysis of competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 58, 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, C T. 1960. On competition. Versl Landbouwk Onderz Ned, 66, 1–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, J H, and Turelli, M. 1989. Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics, 121, 129–138.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi, D, and Jaenike, J. 1984. Competition in natural populations of mycophagous Drosophila Ecology, 65, 1113–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R C. 1965. Selection for colonizing ability. In: Baker, H. G. and Stebblins, G. L. (eds) The Genetics of Colonizing Species, pp. 79–94. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow, T A. 1988. Reproductive behavior of Drosophila melanogaster and D. nigrospiracula in the field and in the laboratory. J Comp Psychol, 102, 169–173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K, and Caligari, P D S. 1981. Competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Measurement of competition. Heredity, 46, 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R S. 1964. Larval competition in Drosophila melanogasterand D. simulans. Ecology, 45, 132–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L, Ewing, A, and Chandler, A. 1987a. Male Size and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster. The roles of male and female behaviour. Anim Behav, 35, 555–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L, and Farquhar, M. 1981. Sexual activity reduces lifespan of male fruitflies. Nature, 294, 580–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L, and Farquhar, M. 1983. Lifetime mating success of male fruitflies (Drosophila melanogaster) is related to their size. Anim Behav, 31, 871–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L, and Fowler, K. 1993. Responses and correlated responses to artificial selection on thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 47, 213–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L, Hoffman, A, and Jones, J S. 1987b. Male size and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura under field conditions. Anim Behav, 35, 468–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, T, and Barker, J S F. 1989. Ecological aspects of the heritability of body size in Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics, 123, 803–813.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riska, B, Prout, T, and Turelli, M. 1989. Laboratory estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations in nature. Genetics, 123, 865–871.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F W. 1957. Studies in quantitative heritance. XI. Genetic and environment correlation between body size and egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. J Genet, 55, 428–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F W. 1963. The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 6. The genetic correlation between the duration of the larval period and body size in relation to larval diet. Genet Res, 4, 74–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, A, Santos, M, Barbadilla, A, Quezada-Diaz, J E, Hasson, E, and Fontdevila, A. 1991. Genetic variance for body size in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics, 128, 739–750.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sang, J H. 1949. The ecological determinants of population growth in a Drosophila culture. III. Larval and pupal survival. Physiol Zool, 22, 183–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M, Fowler, K, and Partridge, L. 1992a. On the use of tester stocks to predict the competitive ability of genotypes. Heredity, 69, 489–495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M, Ruiz, A, Barbadilla, A, Quezada-Diaz, J E, Hasson, E, and Fontdevila, A. 1988. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XIV. Larger flies mate more often in nature. Heredity, 61, 255–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M, Ruiz, A, Quezada-Diaz, J E, Barbadilla, A, and Fontdevila, A. 1992b. The evolutionary history of Drosphila buzzatii. XX. Positive phenotypic covariance between field adult fitness components and body size. J Evol Biol, 5, 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, D, Burnet, B, and Connolly, K. 1975. Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res, 24, 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tantaway, A O, and Rakha, F A. 1964. Studies on natural populations of Drosophila. IV. Genetic variances of and correlations between four characters in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics, 65, 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantaway, A O, and Vetukhiv, M O. 1960. Effects of size on fecundity, longevity and viability in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Am Nat, 94, 395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C E, and Kekic, V. 1988. Sexual selection in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 42, 197–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrot, D R. 1966. Genotypic interaction among competing strains and species of Drosophila. Genetics, 53, 427–435.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G S. 1987. Equilibrium analysis of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 41, 11–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G S, Fowler, K, and Partridge, L. 1990. Resistance of genetic correlation structure to directional selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 44, 1990–2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. Kevin Fowler & Linda Partridge

    Present address: Department of Genetics, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London, NW1 2HE, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK

    Mauro Santos, Kevin Fowler & Linda Partridge

  2. Departamento de Genetica y Microbiologia, Universidad Automona de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain

    Mauro Santos

Authors
  1. Mauro Santos
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin Fowler
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda Partridge
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santos, M., Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. Gene–environment interaction for body size and larval density in Drosophila melanogaster: an investigation of effects on development time, thorax length and adult sex ratio. Heredity 72, 515–521 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.69

Download citation

  • Received: 04 November 1993

  • Issue date: 01 May 1994

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.69

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • body size
  • development time
  • Drosophila melanogaster
  • gene–environment interaction
  • larval density
  • sex ratio

This article is cited by

  • Evaluating the genetic architecture of quantitative traits via selection followed by inbreeding

    • Robert J. Dugand
    • W. Jason Kennington
    • Joseph L. Tomkins

    Heredity (2019)

  • Artificial selection of insects to bioconvert pre-consumer organic wastes. A review

    • Trevor M. Fowles
    • Christian Nansen

    Agronomy for Sustainable Development (2019)

  • Effect of Toxic Heavy Metal Containing Industrial Effluent on Selected Life History Traits, Adult Morphology and Global Protein Expression Pattern of Drosophila melanogaster

    • Sohini-Singha Roy
    • Sujay Ghosh

    Proceedings of the Zoological Society (2018)

  • Size relationships of different body parts in the three dipteran species Drosophila melanogaster, Ceratitis capitata and Musca domestica

    • Natalia Siomava
    • Ernst A. Wimmer
    • Nico Posnien

    Development Genes and Evolution (2016)

  • Plastic Responses to Temperature Versus Local Adaptation at the Cold Extreme of the Climate Gradient

    • Paola Laiolo
    • José Ramón Obeso

    Evolutionary Biology (2015)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited