Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Increased recombination frequencies resulting from directional selection for geotaxis in Drosophila
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 January 1994

Increased recombination frequencies resulting from directional selection for geotaxis in Drosophila

  • Abraham B Korol1 &
  • Konstantin G Iliadi2 

Heredity volume 72, pages 64–68 (1994)Cite this article

  • 1428 Accesses

  • 87 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Several classes of models have been suggested to explain how natural selection can favour non-zero recombination. Directional and fluctuating selection, abiotic and biotic, and selection against harmful mutations seem to be the most plausible factors, but little has been done to test the problem experimentally. Here we show that long-term selection for positive or negative geotaxis in Drosophila melanogaster results in a dramatic increase in recombination rates in different genomic regions. The total increment in recombination for the genome portion considered is 78 cM for geo+ and 66 cM for geo−. Selection for negative geotaxis did not result in recombination changes in chromosome 2 whereas selection in the opposite direction caused nearly a four-fold increase in the b-cn segment and a significant, albeit not as high, increase in the adjacent regions, al-b and cn-vg. In chromosomes X and 3, a significant increase in recombination was found in both selected lines. In total, the increment in exchange frequency in chromosome X (y-cv-ct-v-car) was from 72.6 per cent (the control level) to 124.7 and 110.3 per cent geo− and geo+, respectively, whereas for the studied portion of chromosome 3 (ru-h-cu-sr-e) we obtained, correspondingly, 60.8, 76.4 and 73.8 per cent. Thus, in general, selection for geotaxis resulted in increased recombination frequencies regardless of the direction of selection. These results, taken together with other data, allow one to conclude that selection for fitness traits (e.g. for changed levels of quantitative traits, behavioural peculiarities or adaptation to adverse environmental conditions) may be a powerful factor causing rather rapid changes in the recombination system.

Similar content being viewed by others

Low levels of genetic differentiation with isolation by geography and environment in populations of Drosophila melanogaster from across China

Article 08 March 2021

Predicting recombination suppression outside chromosomal inversions in Drosophila melanogaster using crossover interference theory

Article 01 February 2023

Conserved chromatin and repetitive patterns reveal slow genome evolution in frogs

Article Open access 17 January 2024

Article PDF

References

  • Allard, R W. 1963. Evidence for genetic restriction of recombination in the lima bean. Genetics, 48, 1389–1395.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G, and Maynard Smith, J. 1987. Short-term selection for recombination among mutually antagonistic species. Nature, 328, 66–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, A, and Feldman, M W. 1990. More on selection for and against recombination. Theor Popul Biol, 38, 68–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, A, and Bell, G. 1987. Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination. Nature, 326, 803–805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. 1976. Recombination modification in a fluctuating environment. Genetics, 83, 181–195.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. 1990. Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genet Res, 55, 199–221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B, and Charlesworth, D. 1985. Genetic variation in recombination in Drosophila. II. Genetic analysis of a high recombination stock. Heredity, 54, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinnici, J P. 1971. Modification of recombination frequency in Drosophila. II. The polygene control of crossing over. Genetics, 69, 85–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dewees, A A. 1975. Genetic modification of recombination rate in Tribolium castaneum. Genetics, 81, 537–552.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J, and Yokoyama, S. 1976. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Individual selection for recombination. Genetics, 83, 845–859.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Flexon, P B, and Rodell, C F. 1982. Genetic recombination and directional selection for DDT resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature, 298, 672–675.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorlov, L, Schüler, L, Bunger, L, and Borodin, P. 1992. Chiasma frequency in strains of mice selected for litter size and for high body weight. Theor Appl Genet, 84, 640–642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorodetsky, V P, Zhuchenko, A A, and Korol, A B. 1990. Efficiency of feedback selection for recombination in Drosophila. Genetika (USSR), 26, 1942–1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W D. 1980. Sex versus non-sex versus parasite. Oikos, 35, 282–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harinarayama, G, and Murty, B R. 1971. Cytological regulation of recombination in Pennisetum and Brassica. Cytologia, 36, 345–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. 1963. Behavior genetics and individuality understood. Science, 142, 1436–1442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. (ed.) 1967. Behavior-Genetic Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, M G. 1972. Genetic change of recombination value in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. Artificial selection for high and low recombination and some properties of recombination modifying genes. Genetics, 70, 419–432.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kondrashov, A S. 1988. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature, 336, 435–440.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korol, A, Preygel, I, and Preygel, S. 1990. Variability of Crossing-over in Higher Organisms. Shtiintsa, Kishinev (in Russian). (English version in press, Chapman & Hall.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landner, L. 1971. Genetic control of recombination in Neurospora crassa: correlated regulation in unlinked chromosome intervals. Heredity, 27, 385–392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1980. Selection for recombination in a polygenic model. Genet Res, 35, 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1988. Selection for recombination in a polygenic model: the mechanism. Genet Res, 51, 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michod, R E, and Levin, B R. (eds.). 1988. The Evolution of Sex: An Examination of Current Ideas. Sinauer, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D D. 1972. Genetic and environmental components of chiasma control. II. The response to selection in Schistocerca. Chromosoma, 37, 297–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S G. (ed.) 1987. The Evolution of Sex and its Consequences. Birkhauser, Basel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J R G. 1979. Genetic control of recombination in the silkworm. Heredity, 43, 273–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, H G, Wohrmann, K, and Tomiuk, J. 1987. Experimental evidence for the adaptive value of sexual reproduction. Genetica, 72, 151–159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuchenko, A A, Korol, A B, Kovtyukh, L P, and Tabak, E P. 1983. Increased crossing-over frequency in a population experiencing selection for a resistance to temperature fluctuations. Doklady Acad Nauk USSR, 273, 721–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuchenko, A A, Korol, A B, and Kovtyukh, L P. 1985. Change of crossing-over frequency in Drosophila during selection for resistance to temperature fluctuations. Genetica, 67, 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, 31905, Israel

    Abraham B Korol

  2. Institute of Zoology of the Academy of Sciences, Kishinev, 277028, Moldova

    Konstantin G Iliadi

Authors
  1. Abraham B Korol
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Konstantin G Iliadi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korol, A., Iliadi, K. Increased recombination frequencies resulting from directional selection for geotaxis in Drosophila. Heredity 72, 64–68 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.7

Download citation

  • Received: 14 May 1993

  • Issue date: 01 January 1994

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • crossing-over
  • Drosophila
  • geotaxis
  • recombination evolution
  • two-way selection

This article is cited by

  • Seasonal changes in recombination characteristics in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster

    • Dau Dayal Aggarwal
    • Sviatoslav Rybnikov
    • Abraham B. Korol

    Heredity (2021)

  • Y-chromosomes can constrain adaptive evolution via epistatic interactions with other chromosomes

    • Ian C. Kutch
    • Kenneth M. Fedorka

    BMC Evolutionary Biology (2018)

  • Phenotypic plasticity promotes recombination and gene clustering in periodic environments

    • Davorka Gulisija
    • Joshua B. Plotkin

    Nature Communications (2017)

  • Effect of manipulating recombination rates on response to selection in livestock breeding programs

    • Mara Battagin
    • Gregor Gorjanc
    • John M. Hickey

    Genetics Selection Evolution (2016)

  • Experimental evolution of recombination and crossover interference in Drosophila caused by directional selection for stress-related traits

    • Dau Dayal Aggarwal
    • Eugenia Rashkovetsky
    • Abraham B. Korol

    BMC Biology (2015)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited