Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Differences in the genetic basis of leaf dissection between two populations of Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae)
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 July 1995

Differences in the genetic basis of leaf dissection between two populations of Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae)

  • Stefan Andersson1 

Heredity volume 75, pages 62–69 (1995)Cite this article

  • 536 Accesses

  • 8 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

In the present investigation, I compare the genetic basis of the dissected leaves characterizing two populations of the annual plant Crepis tectorum in the Baltic region, one on the island of Öland (SE Sweden) and the other in the district of Åland (S Finland). Patterns of segregation in crosses using the same simple-leaved plant as a seed parent demonstrate that finely dissected leaves are completely dominant over weakly lobed leaves, that a single major gene may be responsible for the deeply lobed leaves of the Öland population and that three, perhaps four, major genes control leaf dissection in the Åland population. Different dominant genes may be responsible for leaf dissection in the Åland and Öland populations, as shown by the presence of an entire-leaved plant in the F2 progeny of a cross between these populations. These results lend further support to the hypothesis that few genetic changes were involved in the shift from weakly to deeply lobed leaves. Field data from the öland population indicate low penetrance of the single major gene segregating in crosses with simple-leaved populations.

Similar content being viewed by others

Pre-breeding in alfalfa germplasm develops highly differentiated populations, as revealed by genome-wide microhaplotype markers

Article Open access 08 January 2025

A population genomics analysis of the Aotearoa New Zealand endemic rewarewa tree (Knightia excelsa)

Article Open access 20 March 2024

Evidence of local adaptation despite strong drift in a Neotropical patchily distributed bromeliad

Article 05 May 2021

Article PDF

References

  • Andersson, S. 1989a. Variation in heteroblastic succession among populations of Crepis tectorum. Nord J Bot, 8, 565–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1989b. The evolution of self-fertility in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae). Pl Syst Evoi, 168, 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1990. A phenetic study of Crepis tectorum in Fennoscandia and Estonia. Nord J Bot, 9, 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1991a. Geographical variation and genetic analysis of leaf shape in Crept tectorum (Asteraceae). Pl Syst Evol, 178, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1991b. Quantitative genetic variation in a population of Crepis tectorum ssp. pumila (Asteraceae). Biol J Linn Soc, 44, 381–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1992. Phenotypic selection in a population of Crepis tectorum ssp. pumila (Asteraceae). Can J Bot, 70, 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1993a. Morphometric differentiation, patterns of interfertility, and the genetic basis of character evolution in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae). Pl Syst Evol, 184, 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S. 1993b. Population differentiation in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae): patterns of correlation among characters. Biol J Linn Soc, 49, 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, E B. 1947. The genus Crepis I-II. University of California Press, Los Angeles.

  • Charlesworth, B. 1992. Evolutionary rates in partially self-fertilizing species. Am Nat, 140, 126–148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohan, F M. 1984. Can uniform selection retard random genetic divergence between isolated conspecific populations? Evolution, 38, 495–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J L. 1924. Inheritance in Crepis capillaris. III. Nineteen morphological and three physiological characters. Univ Calif Publ Agric Sci, 2, 249–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devicente, M C, and Tanksley, S D. 1993. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Heredity, 134, 585–596.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doebley, J, and Stec, A. 1991. Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics, 129, 285–295.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dorweiler, J, Stec, A, Kermicle, J, and Doebley, J. 1993. Teosinte glume architecture 1: a genetic locus controlling a key step in maize evolution. Science, 262, 233–235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenster, C B, and Barrett, S C H. 1994. Inheritance of mating-system modifier genes in Eichhomia paniculata (Ponte-deriaceae). Heredity, 72, 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R A. 1958. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd edn. Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givnish, T J. 1987. Comparative studies of leaf form: assessing the relative roles of selective pressures and phylogenetic constraints. New Phytol (Suppl.), 106, 131–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L D. 1984. Genetics and morphological evolution in plants. Am Nat, 123, 681–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V. 1975. Genetics of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J B S. 1924. A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. Trans Camb Phil Soc, 23, 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L L, Dewald, C L, and Bohlen, C C. 1992. A macro-mutation in Tripsacum dactyloides (Poaceae): consequences for seed size, germination, and seedling establishment. Am J Bot, 79, 1031–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. 1976. Introduction to Natural Selection. University Park Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1981. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Generics, 99, 541–553.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1983. The response to selection on major and minor mutations affecting a metrical trait. Heredity, 50, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macnair, M R. 1976. The Genetics of Copper Tolerance in Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Phd Thesis, University of Liverpool.

  • Macnair, M R. 1977. Major genes for copper tolerance in Mimulus guttatus. Nature, 268, 428–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macnair, M R, Cumbes, Q J, and Meharg, A A. 1992. The genetics of arsenate tolerance in Yorkshire fog, Holcus lanatus L. Heredity, 69, 325–335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, S S, and Charlesworth, D. 1992. Genetic evidence for multiple origins of dioecy in the Hawaiian shrub Wikstroemia (Thymeleaceae). Evolution, 46, 207–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J G, Baker, L R, and Penner, D. 1973. Inheritance of tolerance to chloramber-methyl-ester in cucumber. J Am Soc Hort Sci, 98, 386–389.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, H A, and Coyne, J A. 1992. The genetics of adaptation: a reassessment. Am Nat, 140, 725–742.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, A H, Damon, S H, Hewitt, J, Zamir, D, Rabinowitch, H, Lincoln, S, Lander, E, and Tanksley, S. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations and environments. Genetics, 127, 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prazmo, W. 1965. Cytogenetic studies on the genus Aquilegia, III. Inheritance of the traits distinguishing different complexes in the genus Aquilegia. Acta Soc Bot Pol, 34, 403–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schat, H, Kuiper, E, Bookum, W M, and Vooijs, R. 1993. A general model for the genetic control of copper tolerance in Silene vulgaris: evidence from crosses between plants from different tolerant populations. Heredity, 70, 142–147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten, W, Van Raamsdonk, L, and Bachmann, K. 1994. Intraspecific evolution of Microseris pygmaea (Asteraceae, Lactuceae) analyzed by cosegregation of phenotypic characters (QTLs) and molecular markers (RAPDs). Pl Syst Evol, 190, 49–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, T W. 1944. The inheritance of certain characters in a cross of two American species of Lactuca. Bull Torrey Bot Club, 71, 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1968. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol 1, Genetic and Biometrie Foundations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements H. C. Prentice provided valuable comments on the manuscript. Technical assistance by Rune Svensson is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Systematic Botany, University of Lund, Vallgatan 18-20, Lund, S - 223 61, Sweden

    Stefan Andersson

Authors
  1. Stefan Andersson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersson, S. Differences in the genetic basis of leaf dissection between two populations of Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae). Heredity 75, 62–69 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1995.104

Download citation

  • Received: 17 October 1994

  • Issue date: 01 July 1995

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1995.104

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • adaptation
  • Crepis tectorum
  • genetic architecture
  • leaf shape
  • penetrance
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited