Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Interpretation of a selection plateau through complex segregation analysis: Euclidean distance index selection for flower colour in the Davis population of Gerbera
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 September 1995

Interpretation of a selection plateau through complex segregation analysis: Euclidean distance index selection for flower colour in the Davis population of Gerbera

  • Kenneth R Tourjee1,
  • James Harding1 &
  • Thomas G Byrne1 

Heredity volume 75, pages 290–296 (1995)Cite this article

  • 728 Accesses

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Two cycles of recurrent phenotypic selection with a weighted Euclidean distance index based on flower colour were applied to individual plants sampled from the Davis population of gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii H. Bolus ex Hooker). The index (I) included CIELAB (1976) variables hue (H), chroma (C) and value (L). The narrow-sense heritability (h2) for I in cycle 0 was estimated at more than 1.0 by half-sib family means and consequently overestimated the selection response. However, the genetic variance was exhausted after two cycles of selection and genetic correlations among the component traits of the index became increasingly positive. Complex segregation analysis (CSA) of index scores in the Davis population supports a mixed Mendelian model with a completely dominant segregating major gene accounting for 20 per cent of the phenotypic variance. This model estimates h2 = 0.9 for I and is discussed as it pertains to the effects of selection on the genetic parameters of the selected population.

Similar content being viewed by others

Implication of high variance in germplasm characteristics

Article Open access 10 January 2023

Incorporating evolutionary and threat processes into crop wild relatives conservation

Article Open access 21 October 2022

Drivers of strong isolation and small effective population size at a leading range edge of a widespread plant

Article Open access 04 April 2023

Article PDF

References

  • Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Aut Control, AC-19, 716–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L H, and Curnow, R N. 1969. Choice of population size and use of variation between replicate populations in plant breeding selection programs. Crop Sci, 9, 555–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M G. 1971. The effect of selection on genetic variability. Am Nat, 105, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, G E. 1984. On the statistical determination of major gene mechanisms in continuous human traits: regressive models. Am J Med Genet, 18, 731–749.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, T G, Harding, J, and Nelson, R L. 1977. Greenhouse gerberas. Calif Agric, 31, 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannings, C, Thompson, E A, and Skolnick, M H. 1978. Probability functions on complex pedigrees. Adv Appl Prob, 10, 26–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalet, C. 1994. An approximate theory of selection assuming a finite number of quantitative trait loci. Génét Sél Évol, 26, 379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R E, and Robinson, H E. 1948. The components of genetic variance in populations of biparental progenies and their use in estimating the average degree of dominance. Biometrics, 4, 254–266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J F, and Kimura, M. 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demenais, F, Lathrop, M, and Lalouel, J M. 1986. Robustness and power of the unified model in the analysis of quantitative measurements. Am J Hum Genet, 38, 228–234.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A W F. 1978. Likelihood An Account of the Statistical Concept of Likelihood and its Application to Scientific Inference, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston, R C. 1993. Some recent developments in the theoretical aspects of segregation analysis. In: P. P. Majumder (ed.) Human Population Genetics. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston, R C, and Stewart, J. 1971. A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered, 21, 523–542.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Raya, L, and Burnside, E B. 1990. The effect of repeated cycles of selection on genetic variance, heritability and response. Theor Appl Genet, 79, 568–574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J, Byrne, T, Huang, H, and Yu, Y. 1991. Multi-trait selection in flower crops. In: Harding, J., Singh F. and Mol, J. N. M. (eds.) Genetics and Breeding of Ornamental Species, pp. 157–178. Kluwer Academic, Boston.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hospital, F, and Chevalet, C. 1993. Effects of population size and linkage on optimal selection intensity. Theor Appl Genet, 86, 775–780.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khoury, M J, Beaty, T H, and Cohen, B H. 1993. Fundamentals of Genetic Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, I M. 1950. Population Genetics and Animal Improvement. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R G. 1992. Reporting of objective color measurements. Hortscience, 27, 1254–1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesek, J, and Baker, R J. 1969. Desired improvement in relation to selection indices. Can J Plant Sci, 49, 803–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 1985. SAS User's Guide Basics, Version 5. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

  • SAS Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

  • Sheridan, A K, and Barker, J S F. 1974. Two-trait selection and genetic correlation. II. Changes in genetic correlation during two-trait selection. Aust J Biol Sci, 27, 89–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tourjee, K R, Harding, J, and Byrne, T G. 1993. Colorimetric analysis of Gerbera flowers. Hortscience, 28, 735–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourjee, K R, Harding, J, and Byrne, T G. 1995. Complex segregation analysis of Gerbera flower colour. Heredity, 74, 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, D H. 1992. Relating colorimeter measurement of plant color to the Royal Horticultural Society colour chart. Hortscience, 27, 1256–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, G, and Wricke, W E. 1986. Quantitative Genetics and Selection in Plant Breeding. W. de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y, Harding, J, and Byrne, T. 1993. Quantitative genetic analysis of flowering time in the Davis population of gerbera. II. Correlations with yield, flower quality traits and the efficiency of indirect selection. Euphytica, 70, 97–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of California, Davis, 95616-8587, CA, USA

    Kenneth R Tourjee, James Harding & Thomas G Byrne

Authors
  1. Kenneth R Tourjee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James Harding
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas G Byrne
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tourjee, K., Harding, J. & Byrne, T. Interpretation of a selection plateau through complex segregation analysis: Euclidean distance index selection for flower colour in the Davis population of Gerbera. Heredity 75, 290–296 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1995.137

Download citation

  • Received: 13 January 1995

  • Issue date: 01 September 1995

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1995.137

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • chroma
  • genetic correlation
  • heritability
  • hue
  • quantitative traits
  • value of colour
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited