Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Maternally inherited sex ratio distortion as a result of a male-killing agent in Spilostethus hospes (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae)
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 August 1996

Maternally inherited sex ratio distortion as a result of a male-killing agent in Spilostethus hospes (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae)

  • Francis R Groeters1 nAff2 

Heredity volume 77, pages 201–208 (1996)Cite this article

  • 575 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

A family composed solely of daughters was produced by a pair of milkweed bugs, Spilostethus hospes (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). The sex ratio among the offspring of the daughters was significantly female-biased, indicating that sex ratio distortion is heritable. The following results suggest that sex ratio distortion is caused by a maternally inherited, male-killing bacterium: females transmitted sex ratio distortion but males did not, egg hatch among pairs expressing sex ratio distortion was half that observed in pairs with unbiased offspring sex ratio, and pairs expressing sex ratio distortion converted to unbiased offspring sex ratio following tetracycline treatment. Successful selection for a highly female-biased sex ratio suggests that there is resistance to sex ratio distortion. Vertical transmission was incomplete and considerably reduced among females that underwent a forced delay in reproduction at cool temperatures analogous to an overwintering phase of the life cycle. An attempt to transfer bacteria horizontally by forcing early instars from a nonhost line to cannibalize host eggs was unsuccessful. With incomplete vertical transmission and no horizontal transmission, the bacterium presumably promotes its existence by boosting the reproductive success of host females, a possibility which remains to be investigated.

Similar content being viewed by others

Endosymbionts moderate constrained sex allocation in a haplodiploid thrips species in a temperature-sensitive way

Article Open access 03 February 2022

Evolution of cross-tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster as a result of increased resistance to cold stress

Article Open access 14 November 2022

Mechanistically comparing reproductive manipulations caused by selfish chromosomes and bacterial symbionts

Article 01 March 2021

Article PDF

References

  • Bull, J J. 1983. Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L M, and Tooby, J. 1981. Cytoplasmic inheritance and intragenomic conflict. J Theor Biol, 89, 83–129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dingle, H. 1968. Life history and population consequences of density, photoperiod, and temperature in a migrant insect, the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus. Am Nat, 102, 149–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingle, H. 1978. Migration and diapause in tropical, temperate and island milkweed bugs. In: Dingle, H (ed.) The Evolution of Insect Migration and Diapause, pp. 254–276. Springer, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbert, M A. 1991. The interaction phenotype in the Drosophila willistoni-spiroplasma symbiosis. Evolution, 45, 971–988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbert, M A. 1992. Endosymbiotic sex ratio distorters in insects and mites. In: Wrensch, D. L. and Ebbert, M. A (eds) Evolution and Diversity of Sex Ratio in Haplodip-loid Insects and Mites, pp. 150–191. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbert, M A. 1995. Variable effects of crowding on Drosophila hosts of male-lethal and non-male-lethal spiroplasmas in laboratory populations. Heredity, 74, 227–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W G. 1980. Evolutionary consequences of intracellular organelle competition. Q Rev Biol, 55, 231–249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gherna, R L, Werren, J H, Weisburg, W, Cote, R, Woese, C R, Mandelco, L, and Brenner, D J. 1991. Arsenophus nasoniae gen.-nov., sp.-nov., the causative agent of the son killer trait in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Int J Syst Bact, 41, 563–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, A A, Turelli, M, and Simmons, G M. 1986. Unidirectional incompatibility between populations of Drosophila simulans. Evolution, 40, 692–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, G J. 1984. An analysis of inherited factors affecting the sex ratio in the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. Heredity, 55, 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, G D D, and Majerus, M E N. 1992. Why do maternally inherited microorganisms kill males? Heredity, 71, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, L D. 1991. The incidences and evolution of cytoplasmic male killers. Proc R Soc B, 244, 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, L D. 1992. Intragenomic conflict as an evolutionary force. Proc R Soc B, 248, 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, L D. 1993. The incidences, mechanisms and evolution of cytoplasmic sex ratio distorters in animals. Biol Rev, 68, 121–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, L D, and Vollrath, F. 1992. Sex-ratio adjustment in solitary and social spiders. Trends Ecol Evol, 7, 326–327.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R Y, and Willey, R B. 1987. Cytological mechanisms of thelytokous parthenogenesis in insects. Genome, 29, 367–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legrand, J J, Legrand-Hamelin, E, and Juchault, P. 1987. Sex determination in Crustacea. Biol Rev, 62, 439–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, J F. 1984. A “sex-ratio” condition in Oncopeltus fasciatus. J Hered, 75, 260–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyttle, T W. 1991. Segregation distorters. Ann Rev Genet, 25, 511–557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, C P. 1977. Effect of host plant density on populations of a specialized, seed sucking bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus. Ecology, 58, 799–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigaud, T, and Juchault, P. 1992. Genetic control of the vertical transmission of a cytoplasmic sex factor in Armadillidium vulgare(Latr.) (Crustacea, Oniscidea). Heredity, 68, 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, D, and Feir, D. 1973. Studies on natural populations of Oncopeltus fasciatus (Dallas), the large milk weed bug. Am Midl Nat, 90, 13–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, S W. 1985. Son-killer: a third extrachromosomal factor affecting the sex ratio in the parasitoid wasp, Nasonia (= Mormoniella) vitripennis. Genetics, 109, 745–759.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stouthamer, R, Luck, R F, and Hamilton, W S. 1990. Antibiotics cause parthenogenetic Trichogramma (Hymenoptera/Trichogrammatidae) to revert to sex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 87, 2424–2427.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thangavelu, K. 1978. Some notes on the ecology of three milkweed bugs in India (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). J Nat Hist, 12, 641–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uyenoyama, M K, and Feldman, M W. 1978. The genetics of sex ratio distortion by cytoplasmic infection under maternal and contagious transmission: an epidemiological study. Theor Pop Biol, 14, 471–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vulinec, K. 1990. Aggregation by insects as a defense. In: Evans, D. L. and Schmidt, J. O (eds) Insect Defenses: Adaptive Mechanisms and Strategies of Prey and Predators, pp. 251–277. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werren, J H. 1987. The coevolution of autosomal and cytoplasmic sex ratio factors. Theor Biol, 124, 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willamson, D L, and Poulson, D F. 1979. Sex ratio organisms (spiroplasmas) of Drosophila. In: Whitcomb, R. F. and Tully, J. G (eds) The Mycoplasmas, vol. 3, pp. 175–208. Academic Press, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wrensch, D L, and Ebbert, M A. (eds) 1992. Evolution and Diversity of Sex Ratio in Haplodiploid Insects and Mites. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zchori-Fein, E, Rousch, R T, and Hunter, M S. 1992. Male production by antibiotic treatment in Encarsia formosa (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), an asexual species. Experientia, 48, 102–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. Francis R Groeters

    Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, U.S.A.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Molecular Evolution and Systematics Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, PO Box 475, Canberra, A.C.T., 2601, Australia

    Francis R Groeters

Authors
  1. Francis R Groeters
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Groeters, F. Maternally inherited sex ratio distortion as a result of a male-killing agent in Spilostethus hospes (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Heredity 77, 201–208 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1996.125

Download citation

  • Received: 09 November 1995

  • Issue date: 01 August 1996

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1996.125

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • horizontal transmission
  • male-killing bacteria
  • maternal inheritance
  • sex ratio distortion
  • Spilostethus hospes
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited