Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Larval foraging behaviour and competition in Drosophila melanogaster
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 January 1996

Larval foraging behaviour and competition in Drosophila melanogaster

  • Gladys Ruiz-Dubreuil1,
  • Barrie Burnet2,
  • Kevin Connolly2 &
  • …
  • Peter Furness3 

Heredity volume 76, pages 55–64 (1996)Cite this article

  • 1767 Accesses

  • 25 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Populations of Drosophila melanogaster derived by bidirectional selection for high (HA) and low (LA) aggregated oviposition behaviour differ significantly in the duration of the larval period and adult size because of differences in the developmental profiles for feeding rate over successive phases of larval growth. Feeding rates of HA larvae are significantly lower than those of LA larvae during the flexible period of growth which precedes attainment of critical mass for pupation. Consequently the HA larvae have a slower mean rate of development. In the fixed postcritical period of development the feeding rates of HA larvae are significantly higher than those of LA larvae. This causes a greater postcritical growth increment and larger adult flies. HA and LA larvae respond adaptively by changing the expression of components of their foraging behaviour depending on whether they are in or out of food. LA larvae exhibit a more flexible pattern of response and are also more successful competitors when food resources are limiting.

Similar content being viewed by others

Fitness consequences of biochemical adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster populations under simultaneous selection for faster pre-adult development and extended lifespan

Article Open access 12 August 2021

Progeny fitness determines the performance of the parasitoid Therophilus javanus, a prospective biocontrol agent against the legume pod borer

Article Open access 26 April 2021

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is a driving force regulating gene expression in bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) larvae development

Article Open access 05 October 2024

Article PDF

References

  • Bakker, K. 1961. An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Arch Neerl Zool, 14, 200–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budnik, M, and Brncic, D. 1975. Effects of larval biotic residues on viability in four species of Drosophila. Evolution, 29, 777–780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnet, B, Sewell, D, and Bos, M. 1977. Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Growth relations and competition between selected lines. Genet Res, 30, 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawood, M M, and Strickberger, M W. 1969. The effects of larval interaction on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Effects of biotic residues. Genetics, 63, 213–220.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Belle, J S, Hiliker, A J, and Sokolowski, M B. 1989. Genetic localization of foraging (for): a major gene for larval behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 123, 157–163.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Del Solar, E, Guljón, A M, and Walker, L. 1974. Choice of coloured substrates for oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Boll Zool, 41, 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, G S, and Gunn, D L. 1940. The Orientation of Animals Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, S A, and Sokolowski, M B. 1989. Rover/sitter Drosophila melanogaster larval foraging polymorphism as a function of larval development, food-patch quality and starvation. J Insect Behav, 2, 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C H, Burnet, B, and Connolly, K J. 1983. Organisation and patterns of inter-and intraspecific variation in the behaviour of Drosophila larvae. Anim Behav, 31, 282–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad-Ali, A Z K, and Burnet, B. 1995. Ethanol tolerance and variation at the alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) locus of Drosophila mauritiana. Heredity, 74, 438–444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Periera, H S, and Sokolowski, M B. 1993. Mutations in the larval foraging gene affect adult locomotory behavior after feeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 90, 5044–5046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D B. 1986. Drosophila: a Practical Approach IRL Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F W. 1957. Studies in quantitative inheritance. XI. Genetic and environmental correlation between body size and egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. J Genet, 55, 428–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F W. 1960. The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 1. Body size and developmental time on different diets. Genet Res, 1, 288–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probertson, F W. 1963. The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 6. The genetic correlation between the duration of the larval period and body size in relation to larval diet. Genet Res, 4, 74–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Dubreuil, D G, and Del Solar, E. 1986. Effect of selection on oviposition site preference in Drosophila melanogaster. Aust J Biol Sci, 39, 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Dubreuil, D G, and Del Solar, E. 1991. Genetic influences on gregarious oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolución Biológica, 5, 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Dubreuil, D G, and Del Solar, E. 1993. A diallel analysis of gregarious oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 70, 281–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Dubreuil, G, Burnet, B, and Connolly, K. 1994. Behavioural correlates of selection for oviposition by Drosophila melanogaster females in a patchy environment. Heredity, 73, 103–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sang, J H. 1949. The ecological determinants of population growth in a Drosophila culture. III. Larval and pupal survival. Physiol Zool, 22, 183–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, M, Fowler, K, and Partridge, L. 1994. Gene-environment interaction for body size and larval density in Drosophila melanogaster: an investigation of effects on development time, thorax length and adult sex ratio. Heredity, 72, 515–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schöne, H. 1984. Spatial Orientation Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, D, Burnet, B, and Connolly, K. 1975. Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res, 24, 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. 1990. Coexistence in a patchy environment. In: Shorrocks, B. and Swingland, I. R. (eds) Living in a Patchy Environment, pp. 91–106. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R R, and Rohlf, F J. 1981. Biometry, 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M B. 1980. Foraging strategies of Drosophila melanogaster. a chromosomal analysis. Behav Genet, 10, 291–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M B, and Hansell, R I C. 1983. Elucidating the behavioural phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster larvae: correlations between larval foraging strategies and pupation height. Behav Genet, 13, 267–280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Ecologia y Evolucion, Universidad Austral, Valdivia, Chile

    Gladys Ruiz-Dubreuil

  2. Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2UH, UK

    Barrie Burnet & Kevin Connolly

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TP, UK

    Peter Furness

Authors
  1. Gladys Ruiz-Dubreuil
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barrie Burnet
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kevin Connolly
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Furness
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruiz-Dubreuil, G., Burnet, B., Connolly, K. et al. Larval foraging behaviour and competition in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 76, 55–64 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1996.7

Download citation

  • Received: 03 April 1995

  • Issue date: 01 January 1996

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1996.7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • behaviour
  • competition
  • Drosophila melanogaster
  • foraging
  • larvae

This article is cited by

  • Interspecies variation of larval locomotion kinematics in the genus Drosophila and its relation to habitat temperature

    • Yuji Matsuo
    • Akinao Nose
    • Hiroshi Kohsaka

    BMC Biology (2021)

  • Foraging by Drosophila melanogaster Larvae in a Patchy Environment

    • John Ringo

    Journal of Insect Behavior (2018)

  • Neurotrophic actions of dopamine on the development of a serotonergic feeding circuit in Drosophila melanogaster

    • Wendi S Neckameyer
    • Parag Bhatt

    BMC Neuroscience (2012)

  • Plasticity and Genotype × Environment Interactions for Locomotion in Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

    • Francisco Del Pino
    • Erika Salgado
    • Raúl Godoy-Herrera

    Behavior Genetics (2012)

  • Genetics Analysis of Larval Foraging Behavior in Drosophila Funebris

    • Claudia Arizmendi
    • Verónica Zuleta
    • Raúl Godoy-Herrera

    Behavior Genetics (2008)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited