Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Heredity
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. heredity
  3. original article
  4. article
Relationship between phenotypic and marker distances: theoretical and experimental investigations
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 November 1997

Relationship between phenotypic and marker distances: theoretical and experimental investigations

  • Judith Burstin1 &
  • Alain Charcosset1 

Heredity volume 79, pages 477–483 (1997)Cite this article

  • 1786 Accesses

  • 55 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Numerous studies have aimed at assessing the relationships between (i) distances computed from phenotypic data, (ii) distances computed from marker data and (iii) heterosis, for pairs of individuals or populations. The conflicting results obtained illustrate that these relationships are far from simple. In this paper, we investigate the effect on these relationships of (i) the polygenic inheritance of phenotypic traits and (ii) the structure of linkage disequilibrium between genetic markers and the loci involved in the variation of quantitative traits (QTLs). Both theoretical and experimental results showed that the relationship between marker distances and phenotypic distances computed from quantitative traits displays a triangular shape: low marker distances are systematically associated with low phenotypic distances, whereas high marker distances correspond to either low or high phenotypic distances. Because of this property, the linear coefficient of correlation between both distances decreases as the number of QTLs involved in the variation of the traits considered for phenotypic distance computation increases. Similar properties are expected for the relationship between heterosis and phenotypic distances.

Similar content being viewed by others

Genome survey and high-resolution genetic map provide valuable genetic resources for Fenneropenaeus chinensis

Article Open access 06 April 2021

Correlational selection in the age of genomics

Article 15 April 2021

Computationally efficient methods for estimating phenome—wide coheritability of multi-type phenotypes using biobank data

Article Open access 13 October 2025

Article PDF

References

  • Atchley, W R, Newman, S, and Cowley, D E. 1988. Genetic divergence in mandible form in relation to molecular divergence in inbred mouse strains. Genetics, 120, 239–253.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hen, A, and Charcosset, A. 1995. Relationship between molecular and morphological distances in a maize inbred lines collection - application for breeders' rights protection. In: van Ooijen, J. W. and Jansen, J. (eds) Biometrics in Plant Breeding: Applications of Molecular Markers, pp. 57–66. Proceedings of the Ninth Meeting of the EUCARPIA Section Biometrics in Plant Breeding, Wageningen.

  • Beavis, W D, Grant, D, Albertsen, M, and Fincher, M. 1991. Quantitative trait loci for plant height in four maize populations and their associations with qualitative genetic loci. Theor Appl Genet, 83, 141–145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burstin, J, Zivy, M, De Vienne, D, and Damerval, C. 1993. Analysis of scaling methods to minimize experimental variations in two-dimensional electrophoresis quantitative data. Applications to the comparison of maize inbred lines. Electrophoresis, 14, 1067–1073.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burstin, J, De Vienne, D, Dubreuil, P, and Damerval, C. 1994. Molecular markers and protein quantities as genetic descriptors in maize. I. Genetic diversity among 21 maize inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet, 89, 943–950.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burstin, J, Charcosset, A, Barriere, Y, Hebert, Y, De Vienne, D, and Damerval, C. 1995. Molecular markers and protein quantities as genetic descriptors in maize. II. Prediction of performance of hybrids for forage traits. Pl Breed, 114, 427–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chantereau, J. 1993. Etude de l'hétérosis chez le sorgho (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) par l'exploitation d'éco-types et l'analyse de leurs divergences. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris Sud.

  • Charcosset, A, and Essioux, L. 1994. The effect of population structure on the relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci. Theor Appl Genet, 89, 336–343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charcosset, A, Lefort-Buson, M, and Gallais, A. 1990. Use of top-cross designs for predicting performance of maize single cross hybrids. Maydica, 35, 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charcosset, A, Lefort-Buson, M, and Gallais, A. 1991. Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci: a theoretical computation. Theor Appl Genet, 89, 571–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damerval, C, Maurice, A, Josse, J M, and De Vienne, D. 1994. Quantitative trait loci underlying gene product variation - a novel perspective for analysing regulation of genome expression. Genetics, 137, 289–301.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dillmann, C, Bar-Hen, A, Guerin, D, Charcosset, A, and Murigneux, A. 1997. Comparison of RFLP and morphological distances between maize Zea mays L. inbred lines. Consequences for germplasm protection purposes Theor Appl Genet, (in press).

  • Falconer, D S. 1981. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaderi, A, Adams, M W, and Nassib, A M. 1984. Relationship between genetic distance and heterosis for yield and morphological traits in dry edible bean and faba bean. Crop Sci, 24, 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefort-Buson, M. 1985. Distance génétique et hétérosis 4. Utilisation de critères biométriques. In: Lefort-Buson, M. and de Vienne, D. (eds) Les Distances Génétiques. INRA, Paris, pp. 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, A, Damerval, C, Hebert, Y, Gallais, A, and De Vienne, D. 1991. Association of protein amount polymorphism (PAP) among maize lines with performance of their hybrids. Theor Appl Genet, 82, 552–560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, H, and Lee, M. 1994. RFLP variation and genealogical distance, multivariate distance, heterosis, and genetic variance in oats. Theor Appl Genet, 87, 947–956.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partap, P S, Dhankhar, B S, Pandita, M L, and Dudi, B S. 1980. Genetic divergence in parents and their hybrids in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Genet Agr, 34, 323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, K V, and Rai, B. 1978. Heterosis as a function of genetic distance in tomato. Indian J Genet Plant Breed, 38, 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J S. 1972. Measures of genetic similarity and genetic distance. In: Wheeler, M. R. (ed.) Studies in Genetics VII, pp. 145–173. University of Texas Publ. 7213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, L H, Kitchener, D J, and How, R A. 1995. A genetic perspective of mammalian variation and evolution in the Indonesian archipelago: biogeographic correlates in the fruit bat genus Cynopterus. Evolution, 49, 399–412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siiddiqui, J A, Prasad, R C, and Mehrar, B. 1976. Hybrid performance in relation to genetic divergence in some varieties of Gossypium hirsutum. Pflanzenzucht, 11, 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S P, and Ramanujam, S. 1981. Genetic divergence and hybrid performance in Cicer arietinum L. Indian J Genet, 41, 268–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, O S, Smith, J S C, Bowen, S L, Tenborg, R A, and Wall, S J. 1990. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet, 80, 833–840.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Touzet, P, Morin, C, Damerval, C, Le Guilloux, M, Zivy, M, and De Vienne, D. 1995. Characterizing allelic proteins for genome mapping in maize. Electrophoresis, 16, 1289–1294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Touzet, P, De Vienne, D, Huet, J C, Ouali, C, Bouet, F, and Zivy, M. 1996. Amino acid analysis of proteins separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis in maize: Isoform detection and function identification. Electrophoresis, 17, 1393–1401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, R K, and O'Brien, S J. 1986. Empirical demonstration that structural genes and morphometric variation of mandible traits are uncoupled between mouse strains. J Mammal, 67, 441–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INRA-UPS-INAPG, Station de Génétique Végétale, Ferme du Moulon, Gif/Yvette, 91190, France

    Judith Burstin & Alain Charcosset

Authors
  1. Judith Burstin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alain Charcosset
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Charcosset.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burstin, J., Charcosset, A. Relationship between phenotypic and marker distances: theoretical and experimental investigations. Heredity 79, 477–483 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1997.187

Download citation

  • Received: 26 October 1996

  • Issue date: 01 November 1997

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1997.187

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • genetic distances
  • heterozygosity
  • markers
  • polygenic inheritance

This article is cited by

  • Evolution of asexual Daphnia pulex in Japan: variations and covariations of the digestive, morphological and life history traits

    • Xiaofei Tian
    • Hajime Ohtsuki
    • Jotaro Urabe

    BMC Evolutionary Biology (2019)

  • Use of GBS markers to distinguish among lucerne varieties, with comparison to morphological traits

    • Bernadette Julier
    • Philippe Barre
    • Vincent Gensollen

    Molecular Breeding (2018)

  • Re-orienting crop improvement for the changing climatic conditions of the 21st century

    • Chikelu Mba
    • Elcio P Guimaraes
    • Kakoli Ghosh

    Agriculture & Food Security (2012)

  • Comparative potential of phenotypic, ISSR and SSR markers for characterization of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) varieties from India

    • Vinod Kumar
    • Satyendra Nath Sharma

    Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology (2011)

  • Characterizing the molecular and morphophysiological diversity of Italian red clover

    • Mario A. Pagnotta
    • Paolo Annicchiarico
    • Sandro Proietti

    Euphytica (2011)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Podcasts
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open access publishing
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Heredity (Heredity)

ISSN 1365-2540 (online)

ISSN 0018-067X (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited