Table 4 Accuracy of mapping epistatic pair in the core scenariosa
From: Controlling false positives in the mapping of epistatic QTL
Exactb (%) | Locus 1 precision (cM) c | Locus 2 precision (cM) c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1D_path | 2D_path | 1D_path | 2D_path | ||
Com2.5% | 10.1 | 3.0 (96.8, 3.2) | 2.7 (100, 0.0) | 3.4 (95.7, 4.3) | 1.9 (100, 0.0) |
Com5.0% | 64.2 | 1.7 (100, 0.0) | 1.8 (100, 0.0) | 1.7 (99.8, 0.2) | 1.7 (100, 0.0) |
Com7.5% | 96.6 | 1.3 (100, 0.0) | 1.3 (100, 0.0) | 1.3 (100, 0.0) | 1.3 (100, 0.0) |
Dup2.5% | 1.5 | 5.1 (88.9, 11.1) | 3.8 (100, 0.0) | 4.3 (88.9, 11.1) | 3.9 (100, 0.0) |
Dup5.0% | 15.8 | 4.2 (85.9, 14.1) | 3.8 (93.3, 6.7) | 4.9 (85.9, 12.9) | 4.0 (89.6, 10.4) |
Dup7.5% | 41.9 | 4.8 (89.5, 9.8) | 4.0 (92.8, 6.5) | 4.7 (90.2, 9.0) | 3.5 (94.1, 5.6) |
Dom2.5% | 3.3 | 4.3 (88.6, 11.4) | 4.0 (87.5, 12.5) | 8.8 (80.0, 14.3) | 8.1 (75.0, 12.5) |
Dom5.0% | 35.1 | 2.8 (98.5, 1.5) | 2.3 (98.3, 1.7) | 4.6 (91.0, 7.1) | 4.2 (93.4, 4.1) |
Dom7.5% | 66.7 | 1.7 (99.7, 0.3) | 2.0 (99.4, 0.6) | 3.5 (95.7, 4.1) | 3.7 (94.9, 4.8) |
Rec2.5% | 4.6 | 6.4 (81.1, 18.9) | 6.4 (88.9, 0.0) | 3.2 (97.3, 2.7) | 4.9 (77.8, 22.2) |
Rec5.0% | 32.4 | 5.2 (84.4, 14.1) | 4.8 (86.5, 11.3) | 1.9 (100, 0.0) | 1.9 (110.0, 0.0) |
Rec7.5% | 62.9 | 4.4 (92.1, 6.0) | 3.9 (94.4, 4.8) | 1.7 (99.6, 0.4) | 1.5 (99.7, 0.3) |
Inh2.5% | 7.3 | 2.7 (100, 0.0) | 3.5 (100, 0.0) | 5.2 (87.7, 12.3) | 4.3 (100, 0.0) |
Inh5.0% | 39.8 | 2.2 (99.4, 0.6) | 1.9 (100, 0.0) | 4.4 (91.3, 7.0) | 3.4 (96.6, 3.4) |
Inh7.5% | 72.3 | 1.6 (99.9, 0.1) | 1.5 (100, 0.0) | 3.4 (95.6, 4.0) | 3.3 (96.3, 3.3) |
Int2.5% | 0.0 | — | 5.0 (100, 0.0) | — | 8.1 (80.0, 20.0) |
Int5.0% | 6.7 | — | 4.9 (89.9, 10.1) | — | 4.2 (91.3, 8.7) |
Int7.5% | 24.1 | — | 4.4 (91.1, 8.5) | — | 4.3 (89.9, 10.1) |
Int10.0% | 45.3 | — | 3.9 (92.6, 7.1) | — | 4.0 (93.1, 6.4) |
Int12.5% | 58.9 | — | 3.5 (95.5, 4.5) | — | 3.6 (94.8, 4.9) |