Table 1 Single locus goodness-of-fit test for loss of pungency in Capsicum frutescens
From: Contrasting modes for loss of pungency between cultivated and wild species of Capsicum
Generation | Total | # Pungent | # Non-pungent | Expected ratio | χ 2 | df | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
na | Average (low–high range) | n | Average (low–high range) | ||||||
C. frutescens BG2814-6 × C. frutescens PI594141-np field grown | |||||||||
PaS1 | 4 | 4 | 3121 (1877–5492)b | 0 | |||||
PbS1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | (ND)c | |||||
F1 | 1 | 1 | 3294 | 0 | |||||
F2 | 60 | 48 | 5220 (672–11475) | 12 | (ND) | 3:1 | 0.8 | 1 | 0.37 |
C. frutescens BG2814-6 × C. frutescens PI594141-np greenhouse grown | |||||||||
PaS1 | 1 | 1 | 12794 | 0 | |||||
PbS1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | (ND) | |||||
F1 | 1 | 1 | 3294 | 0 | |||||
F2 | 41 | 33 | 5934 (97–19 557) | 8 | (ND) | 3:1 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.40 |
C. frutescens BG2814-6 × C. frutescens PI594141-np pooled | |||||||||
PaS1 | 5 | 5 | 5506 (1877–12 794) | 0 | |||||
PbS1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | (ND) | |||||
F1 | 1 | 1 | 3294 | 0 | |||||
F2 | 101 | 81 | 5511 (97–19 557) | 20 | (ND) | 3:1 | 1.46 | 1 | 0.22 |
