Figure 3

DPR analyses. (a) Average residuals and 95% CIs from the regression in Figure 2. (b–d) DPR of genetic (FST/(1-FST) versus geographic distance (km) for each of the 35 population-year combinations. Each of the two ‘true’ outlier populations was regressed with the 33 non-outlier populations (b), whereas each of the 33 non-outlier populations was regressed with the other 32 populations showing statistically significant (c) and non-significant (d) regressions.