Table 2 Intercepts and slopes of the decomposed pairwise regressions for each population

From: Strong gene flow and lack of stable population structure in the face of rapid adaptation to local temperature in a spring-spawning salmonid, the European grayling (Thymallus thymallus)

Population

Intercept (±standard error) a

Slope (±standard error) a

r2

Group b

Outlier populations

 SAN07

1.88e–2 (1.20e–3)***

4.31e–4 (3.05e–4)

0.061

B

 LAG01

1.89e–2 (2.29e–3)***

1.79e–4 (3.54e–4)

0.008

B

Non-outlier populations

 RAU04

5.41e–3 (1.82e–3)**

–1.44e–4 (3.16e–4)

0.007

D

 MYR04

2.84e–3 (1.44e–3)

4.16e–4 (2.48e–4)

0.085

D

 NSKO01

1.65e–3 (1.29e–3)

7.27e–4 (2.39e–4)**

0.235

C

 SSKO01

5.72e–3 (1.42e–3)***

1.37e–3 (3.09e–4)***

0.395

C

 SSKO04

1.76e–3 (9.10e–4)

1.06e–3 (1.98e–4)***

0.488

C

 SSKO06

–2.35e–5 (1.09e–3)

9.26e–4 (2.37e–4)***

0.337

C

 SSKO07

5.26e–4 (9.58e–4)

8.37e–4 (2.08e–4)***

0.349

C

 SSKO08

4.22e–5 (8.98e–4)

1.12e–3 (1.95e–4)***

0.523

C

 STE01

1.15e–3 (1.24e–3)

6.16e–4 (2.70e–4)*

0.148

C

 STE04

1.80e–3 (7.39e–4)*

6.50e–4 (1.60e–4)***

0.353

C

 STE05

5.98e–3 (1.16e–3)***

7.30e–4 (2.51e–4)**

0.220

C

 STE06

1.99e–3 (1.27e–3)

1.27e–3 (2.77e–4)***

0.412

C

 STE07

9.34e–4 (9.59e–4)

3.06e–4 (2.08e–4)

0.067

D

 STE08

3.23e–3 (1.02e–3)**

1.00e–3 (2.21e–4)***

0.407

C

 BRA01

–5.53e–4 (8.71e–4)

8.03e–4 (2.05e–4)***

0.338

C

 BRA06

4.16e–3 (1.09e–3)***

1.77e–4 (2.58e–4)

0.016

D

 ROT06

5.17e–3 (1.05e–3)***

1.44e–4 (2.29e–4)

0.013

D

 BRY01

2.87e–3 (2.27e–3)

1.33e–3 (6.46e–4)*

0.124

C

 NHYR01

4.33e–3 (3.45e–3)

1.49e–3 (9.61e–4)

0.074

D

 SHYR03

9.01e–4 (2.24e–3)

9.33e–4 (5.66e–4)

0.083

D

 SHYR06

3.88e–3 (1.64e–3)*

1.22e–4 (4.16e–4)

0.003

D

 SHYR08

6.48e–3 (1.96e–3)**

1.78e–4 (4.96e–4)

0.004

D

 VAL01

3.37e–3 (1.40e–3)*

2.78e–6 (2.69e–4)

0.000

D

 VAL03

4.84e–3 (1.04e–3)***

–1.17e–4 (1.99e–4)

0.011

D

 VAL04

6.07e–3 (1.83e–3)**

1.75e–4 (3.52e–4)

0.008

D

 VAL05

1.14e–2 (1.73e–3)***

1.62e–5 (3.33e–4)

0.000

D

 VAL06

3.51e–3 (1.31e–3)*

–1.42e–4 (2.52e–4)

0.011

D

 VAL07

2.72e–3 (1.20e–3)*

1.46e–4 (2.32e–4)

0.013

D

 VAL08

6.57e–3 (1.42e–3)***

–2.06e–4 (2.73e–4)

0.019

D

 SPR05

7.15e–3 (1.78e–3)***

6.54e–5 (3.26e–4)

0.001

D

 BRE05

9.44e–3 (1.88e–3)***

9.08e–5 (3.13e–4)

0.003

D

 SAN05

1.39e–2 (1.83e–3)***

–2.85e–4 (2.75e–4)

0.035

D

 SAN08

1.47e–2 (1.55e–3)***

–3.49e–4 (2.34e–4)

0.069

D

  1. *P<0.05; **P<0.001; ***P<0.0001.
  2. aThe significance of each relationship was assessed by ordinary least squares regression.
  3. bLetters (B–D) indicate the observed regression pattern (see Figure 3).
Back to article page