Table 3 Results of simple and partial Mantel test analyses on the effect of pairwise environmental factors on pairwise Fst for Kalø and Fussingø areas

From: Gene flow and population structure of a common agricultural wild species (Microtus agrestis) under different land management regimes

Area

Mantel test/partial Mantel test

r

P-value

Kalø

Genetics vs log (geographical distance)

−0.084

0.594

 

Genetics vs connectivity

−0.116

0.820

 

Genetics vs road side

−0.330

0.851

 

Genetics vs georaphical distance, given connectivity

−0.193

0.698

 

Genetics vs connectivity, given geographical distance

−0.208

0.827

 

Genetics vs geographical distance, given roadside

−0.077

0.584

 

Genetics vs roadside, given geographical distance

−0.328

0.802

Fussingø

Genetics vs log (geographical distance)

0.966

0.004

 

Genetics vs connectivity

−0.588

0.931

 

Genetics vs roadside

−0.100

0.334

 

Genetics vs geographical distance, given connectivity

0.947

0.005

 

Genetics vs connectivity, given geographical distance

−0.031

0.759

 

Genetics vs geographical distance, given roadside

0.966

0.018

 

Genetics vs roadside, given geographical distance

−0.168

0.334

Fussingø without distant field

Genetics vs log (geographical distance)

0.689

0.027

 

Genetics vs connectivity

−0.214

0.796

 

Genetics vs roadside

0.482

0.200

 

Genetics vs geographical distance, given connectivity

0.674

0.024

 

Genetics vs connectivity, given geographical distance

−0.099

0.576

 

Genetics vs geographical distance, given roadside

0.578

0.075

 

Genetics vs roadside, given geographical distance

0.163

0.362

  1. Significant factors are shown in bold.