Table 1 Sampling information, number of alleles and heterozygosities for 14 populations at 10 microsatellite loci

From: The genetic architecture of hybridisation between two lineages of greenshell mussels

Population ^a	N		Locus										Mean
			Pcan2–60	Pcan10–36	Pcan6–17	Pcan2–20	Pcan1–25	Pcan1–29	Pcan2–17	Pcan1–27	Pcan22-11	Pcan10–44
TAS	20	A	3	5	16	7	6	20	4	11	15	7	9.40
		H _O	0.50	0.55	0.65	0.74	0.55	0.85	0.40	0.75	0.65	0.50	0.61
		H _E	0.55	0.77	0.93	0.77	0.68	0.93	0.48	0.86	0.91	0.84	0.77
CAP	30	A	4	5	18	8	6	23	4	10	18	15	11.10
		H _O	0.43	0.63	0.63	0.77	0.60	0.77	0.57	0.63	0.87	0.80	0.67
		H _E	0.54	0.72	0.89	0.79	0.73	0.92	0.54	0.68	0.87	0.91	0.76
MAU	29	A	3	8	15	5	7	20	4	11	17	13	10.30
		H _O	0.41	0.62	0.93	0.62	0.66	0.72	0.34	0.69	0.76	0.66	0.64
		H _E	0.48	0.59	0.90	0.71	0.66	0.89	0.43	0.78	0.83	0.88	0.71
OPO	27	A	4	5	15	8	7	18	4	9	12	12	9.40
		H _O	0.63	0.52	0.74	0.78	0.70	0.52	0.59	0.56	0.70	0.70	0.64
		H _E	0.56	0.70	0.91	0.81	0.67	0.86	0.56	0.64	0.85	0.82	0.74
CAM	25	A	3	7	14	7	4	18	3	7	15	15	9.30
		H _O	0.48	0.72	0.68	0.68	0.48	0.52	0.68	0.44	0.76	0.88	0.63
		H _E	0.48	0.78	0.91	0.76	0.54	0.92	0.56	0.53	0.85	0.91	0.72
FLE	14	A	2	5	14	5	6	13	3	6	12	12	7.80
		H _O	0.21	0.64	0.57	0.64	0.79	0.50	0.57	0.50	0.79	0.79	0.60
		H _E	0.39	0.75	0.93	0.72	0.77	0.86	0.58	0.64	0.90	0.92	0.75
WEST	13	A	3	6	9	5	4	11	3	7	11	10	6.90
		H _O	0.46	0.85	0.69	0.77	0.62	0.38	0.38	0.69	0.77	0.77	0.64
		H _E	0.46	0.78	0.90	0.77	0.63	0.87	0.62	0.70	0.87	0.91	0.75
KAI	16	A	3	5	18	7	6	14	2	5	9	11	8.00
		H _O	0.50	0.88	0.75	0.63	0.81	0.63	0.44	0.75	0.63	0.63	0.66
		H _E	0.40	0.80	0.94	0.79	0.73	0.94	0.47	0.64	0.78	0.91	0.74
LWR	26	A	3	5	17	8	7	20	4	5	14	16	9.90
		H _O	0.42	0.58	0.88	0.62	0.92	0.77	0.69	0.46	0.85	0.81	0.70
		H _E	0.47	0.68	0.94	0.77	0.74	0.94	0.56	0.54	0.86	0.90	0.74
TIM	22	A	3	6	13	6	6	16	5	1	9	16	8.10
		H _O	0.73	0.59	0.82	0.64	0.73	0.64	0.59	0.00	0.77	0.76	0.63
		H _E	0.53	0.75	0.90	0.78	0.62	0.92	0.56	0.00	0.77	0.93	0.68
BGB	20	A	4	7	13	6	6	17	3	3	14	13	8.60
		H _O	0.75	0.80	0.80	0.70	0.55	0.75	0.60	0.15	0.90	0.75	0.68
		H _E	0.53	0.79	0.87	0.75	0.72	0.91	0.61	0.14	0.89	0.89	0.71
HSB	22	A	3	8	15	7	7	17	3	8	13	16	9.70
		H _O	0.32	0.77	0.86	0.55	0.50	0.55	0.36	0.64	0.77	0.64	0.60
		H _E	0.46	0.82	0.92	0.74	0.70	0.92	0.55	0.60	0.84	0.93	0.75
FIO	19	A	2	4	14	6	7	20	4	3	12	12	8.40
		H _O	0.53	0.53	0.84	0.53	0.84	0.68	0.37	0.47	0.79	0.74	0.63
		H _E	0.48	0.59	0.91	0.75	0.70	0.95	0.47	0.38	0.86	0.92	0.70
GOB	28	A	2	5	15	7	6	17	3	8	18	19	10.00
		H _O	0.50	0.61	0.50	0.68	0.64	0.64	0.46	0.57	0.71	0.79	0.61
		H _E	0.47	0.73	0.90	0.77	0.69	0.90	0.41	0.57	0.89	0.90	0.72

Abbreviations: A, number of alleles; H_E, expected heterozygosity; H_O, observed heterozygosity; HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; N, number of samples.
Significant population- and locus-specific departures from HWE (after correction for multiple testing) are shown in bold.
^aPopulation code—refer to Figure 1 for location.

Back to article page

Table 1 Sampling information, number of alleles and heterozygosities for 14 populations at 10 microsatellite loci

Search

Quick links