Table 1 Characteristics of several commercially available NGS platforms

From: From next-generation resequencing reads to a high-quality variant data set

 

Capillary

Next generation

 

Sanger

454

Illumina

Ion Torrent

Platform

3730xl

GS FLX+

GS Jr.a

HiSeq X Ten

HiSeq 2500

MiSeqa

PGM 318a

Template preparation

Plasmid/PCR

emPCR

emPCR

Solid phase

Solid phase

Solid phase

emPCR

Run time

~3 h

~1 Day

~10 h

~3 Days

~6 Days

~65 h

~4–7 h

Output/run

0.08 Mb

700 Mb

35 Mb

1.8 Tb

1 Tb

15 Gb

2 Gb

Read length

1 kb

1 kb

700 b

2 × 150 b

2 × 125 b

2 × 300 b

400 b

No. of reads/run

96 (standard) up to 384 (rare)

1 M

0.1 M

6 B

4 B

25 M

5.5 M

Error rateb

0.1–1%

~1%

~1%

~0.1%

~0.1%

~0.1%

~1%

Primary errors

Substitutions

Indels

Substitutionsc

Indels

Advantages

• Long reads

• High quality

• Long reads

• Fast run time

• Highest throughput

• Low per-base cost

• Unmodified nucleotides

• No optical scanning necessary, and thus no photo damage

• Fast run time

Limitations

• Low throughput

• High costs

• High error rates in homopolymer regions

• Low throughput

• High costs

• Cumbersome emPCR

• Short reads

• Random dispersion of clusters can cause poor sequence quality

• Underrepresentation of AT-rich and GC-rich regions

• High error rates in homopolymer regions

• Cumbersome emPCR

  1. Abbreviations: emPCR, emulsion PCR; NGS, next-generation sequencing.
  2. Information based on company sources.
  3. aInexpensive, compact bench-top sequencers with faster turnover rates but lower sequencing capacity.
  4. bError rates between different platforms might not be exactly comparable.
  5. cBiased toward A<->C and G<->T transversions.