Table 1 Summary statistics for Gadopsis marmoratus in the MDB based on 12 microsatellite DNA markers

From: Landscape genetics informs mesohabitat preference and conservation priorities for a surrogate indicator species in a highly fragmented river system

 

Site (code)

N

Na (± s.d.)

% Poly loci

Ar

Pa

FIS

HWE

Ho

HE

Pop.-specific Fst

Upper Darling

Browns Ck (BRN)

37

1.92 (0.38)

50%

1.65

0.00

0.04

0.002

0.47

0.49

0.689

 

Molong Ck (MOL)

6

2.00 (0.17)

83%

1.92

0.08

0.19

0.751

0.35

0.43

0.516

 

Shawns Ck (SCC)

35

2.83 (0.41)

83%

1.79

0.33

0.17

0.000

0.21

0.25

0.503

Upper Murray

Abercrombie R (ABE)

5

2.17 (0.21)

92%

2.09

0.17

0.61

0.047

0.20

0.47

0.488

 

Catherines Ck (CAT)

9

2.42 (0.31)

92%

2.10

0.00

0.59

0.000

0.16

0.38

0.498

 

Stony Ck (SCP)

5

3.08 (0.36)

83%

2.90

0.25

0.49

0.001

0.36

0.66

0.252

 

Scrubby R (SCR)

22

2.58 (0.34)

83%

2.15

0.08

0.14

0.062

0.43

0.50

0.501

 

Hughes Ck (HUG)

30

3.42 (0.49)

92%

2.38

0.50

−0.03

0.128

0.48

0.46

0.428

 

King Parrot Ck (KPC)

26

2.08 (0.38)

58%

1.57

0.17

0.16

0.005

0.28

0.33

0.641

 

Birch Ck (BIT)

5

3.08 (0.40)

92%

2.88

0.42

0.12

0.450

0.51

0.57

0.250

 

Creswick Ck (CRT)

5

2.67 (0.376)

75%

2.54

0.17

−0.04

0.198

0.69

0.66

0.323

 

Avoca R (AVL)

10

3.33 (0.36)

92%

2.55

0.17

0.42

0.000

0.29

0.49

0.290

Lower Murray

Marne R (MAR)

8

2.83 (0.35)

83%

2.42

0.08

0.03

0.957

0.55

0.57

0.336

 

Angas R (ARS)

32

2.33 (0.26)

83%

1.63

0.08

0.14

0.389

0.28

0.33

0.613

 

Rodwell Ck (ROD)

29

3.08 (0.40)

83%

2.25

0.17

0.19

0.000

0.40

0.49

0.417

 

Nangkita Ck (NAN)

18

3.33 (0.50)

100%

2.26

0.25

0.33

0.000

0.26

0.38

0.386

 

Tookayerta Ck (TOO)

24

3.67 (0.61)

92%

2.30

0.25

0.37

0.000

0.28

0.45

0.390

Average

 

18

2.75 (0.10)

83%

2.20

0.19

0.23

 

0.37

0.39

Global Fst=0.45

  1. Abbreviations: HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; MDB, Murray–Darling Basin.
  2. Number of individuals genotyped at each site (N), average number of alleles per locus (Na), percentage of polymorphic loci (% poly loci), allelic richness (Ar), proportion of private alleles (Pa), inbreeding coefficient (FIS), HWE P-values, observed heterozygosity (HO) and expected heterozygosity (HE) and the population-specific Fst.
  3. Bold P-values indicate significant deviations after Bonferroni correction. Only sites with ⩾5 individuals are included (see Supplementary Table S1 for details).
Back to article page