Table 4 Results of maximum likelihood population effects (MLPE) model selection after accounting for non-independence of pairwise distance observations

From: Influence of landscape features on the microgeographic genetic structure of a resident songbird

Model

Regression slope Est.±95% Confidence Intervals

Marginal R2

 

Distance

Elevation

Land cover

Land-elevation

 

(a)

 4

—

—

—

0.83±0.04

0.879

 9

0.01±0.01

—

—

0.83±0.04

0.878

 7

—

2.05±5.42

0.83±0.04

—

0.875

 6

0.01±0.01

—

0.83±0.04

—

0.875

 3

—

—

0.89±0.04

—

0.875

 8

0.03±0.02

−7.38±10.72

0.81±0.04

—

0.874

 5

0.23±0.11

94.38±45.94

—

—

0.158

 1

0.05±0.06

—

—

—

0.022

 2

—

−12.00±27.41

—

—

0.008

(b)

 9

0.08±0.05

—

—

0.59±0.14

0.711

 6

0.08±0.05

—

0.59±0.14

—

0.710

 7

—

24.19±20.31

0.65±0.14

—

0.709

 8

0.12±0.10

−17.46±42.29

0.56±0.16

—

0.694

 4

—

—

—

0.06±0.37

0.667

 3

—

—

0.64±0.15

—

0.660

 5

0.27±0.11

−80.24±48.16

—

—

0.173

 1

0.11±0.07

—

—

—

0.129

 2

—

16.96±29.46

—

—

0.022

  1. For all models, pairwise (a) FST and (b) DEST values were the response variable. Models are ranked based on marginal R2 value (high to low) with the best fitting model having the highest R2 value. For each explanatory variable included in the model, values (× 10–4) are presented as regression slopes±95% confidence interval. Values in bold indicate significant parameter estimates (that is, 95% confidence intervals that do not overlap zero). Explanatory variables not included in the model are indicated by ‘—’.