Table 4 Posterior model probability and posterior mode and 95% HPD of parameters for the compared four population divergence models

From: Population structure and historical demography of Dipteronia dyeriana (Sapindaceae), an extremely narrow palaeoendemic plant from China: implications for conservation in a biodiversity hot spot

Model

Posterior probability

Parameter (mode/95% HPD)

  

NANC

TDIV(kya)

mEW(× 10−4)

mWE(× 10−4)

NmEW

NmWE

β

Shape

Model I

0.006

189 (9–756)

4.0 (2.9–10.5)

     

3.92 (2.05–4.99)

Model IMEW

0.004

240 (17–1169)

4.9 (3.6–16.2)

0.9 (0.1–9.1)

 

0.1 (0.0–1.0)

 

0.444 (0.024–0.961)

4.31 (1.29–5.00)

Model IM WE

0.737

1004 (33–2736)

17.3 (6.7–1689.3)

 

16.9 (6.50–29.3)

 

1.9 (0.7–3.2)

0.875 (0.177–0.999)

4.42 (1.66–5.00)

Model IM

0.254

657 (63–2795)

35.1 (17.7–1918.9)

0.3 (0.1–7.3)

19.5 (5.5–36.7)

0.3 (0.0–0.8)

2.1 (0.6–4.0)

0.912 (0.241–0.999)

3.45 (1.29–5.00)

  1. Abbreviations: HPD, highest posterior density; mEW and mWE, migration rate per generation from east to west and from west to east for backward in time, respectively; TDIV, divergence time that is scaled in generations.
  2. Best-supported model is shown in bold.
Back to article page