Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Hypertension Research
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • Log in
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. hypertension research
  3. original article
  4. article
Renal Protective Effect in Hypertensive Patients: The High Doses of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (HARB) Study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Published: 01 December 2007

Renal Protective Effect in Hypertensive Patients: The High Doses of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (HARB) Study

  • Mitsuru Ohishi1,
  • Takashi Takagi1,
  • Norihisa Ito1,
  • Yuji Tatara1,
  • Norihiro Hayashi1,
  • Atsushi Shiota1,
  • Yoshihiro Iwamoto1,
  • Tomohiro Katsuya1,
  • Hiromi Rakugi1 &
  • …
  • Toshio Ogihara1 

Hypertension Research volume 30, pages 1187–1192 (2007)Cite this article

  • 1622 Accesses

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are the recommended first-line antihypertensive treatment for managing chronic kidney disease, and strict blood pressure (BP) regulation is crucial for the reduction of proteinuria. Valsartan and candesartan are commonly used ARBs in Japan, with maximum permissible doses of 160 mg/day and 12 mg/day, respectively. We evaluated BP and proteinuria after changeover from the maximum dose of candesartan to the maximum dose of valsartan, in 55 poorly controlled hypertensive patients undergoing candesartan treatment who were unable to achieve optimal BP according to the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2004). We measured BP and pulse rate and assessed urinary protein excretion (UPE) before and after changeover. Changeover was associated with decreases in systolic BP and diastolic BP from 158/89 mmHg to 150/86 mmHg (p<0.01). Changeover was also associated with a reduction in UPE adjusted to urinary creatinine from 0.35±0.19 g/g creatinine to 0.19±0.37 g/g creatinine (p=0.0271) in patients who had high urinary protein levels prior to changeover without significant decreases in BP (p=0.0184). According to multiple regression analysis, higher UPE (p<0.0001) and a lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p=0.0011) prior to changeover were independently correlated with reduction in UPE. Our results suggest that the maximum dose of valsartan is more effective than the maximum dose of candesartan for reducing BP and proteinuria.

Similar content being viewed by others

Antihypertensive effects and safety of esaxerenone in patients with moderate kidney dysfunction

Article Open access 16 December 2020

Exploratory study on the relationship between urinary sodium/potassium ratio, salt intake, and the antihypertensive effect of esaxerenone: the ENaK Study

Article Open access 11 January 2024

The FimAsartaN proTeinuriA SusTaIned reduCtion in comparison with losartan in diabetic chronic kidney disease (FANTASTIC) trial

Article 20 September 2022

Article PDF

References

  1. Peralta CA, Kurella M, Lo JC, Chertow GM : The metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2006; 15: 361–365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Segura J, Campo C, Gil P, et al: Development of chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular prognosis in essential hypertensive patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 1616–1622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Leeuw PW, Thijs L, Birkenhager WH, et al: Prognostic significance of renal function in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension: results from the Syst-Eur trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 2213–2222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marin R, Gorostidi M, Fernandez-Vega F, Alvarez-Navascues R : Systemic and glomerular hypertension and progression of chronic renal disease: the dilemma of nephrosclerosis. Kidney Int Suppl 2005; ( 99): S52–S56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayashi K, Wakino S, Homma K, Sugano N, Saruta T : Pathophysiological significance of T-type Ca2+ channels: role of T-type Ca2+ channels in renal microcirculation. J Pharmacol Sci 2005; 99: 221–227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang T, Takabatake T : Effects of vasopeptidase inhibition on renal function and tubuloglomerular feedback in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertens Res 2005; 28: 611–618.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caldicott WJ, Taub KJ, Margulies SS, Hollenberg NK : Angiotensin receptors in glomeruli differ from those in renal arterioles. Kidney Int 1981; 19: 687–693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, et al: Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 861–869.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruggenenti P, Perna A, Loriga G, et al: Blood-pressure control for renoprotection in patients with non-diabetic chronic renal disease (REIN-2): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 939–946.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, et al: Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 2022–2031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parving HH, Lehnert H, Brochner-Mortensen J, et al: The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 870–878.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujikawa K, Hasebe N, Kikuchi K : Cost-effectiveness analysis of hypertension treatment: controlled release nifedipine and candesartan low-dose combination therapy in patients with essential hypertension—the Nifedipine and Candesartan Combination (NICE-Combi) Study. Hypertens Res 2005; 28: 585–591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, et al: Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme. Lancet 2003; 362: 759–766.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohn JN, Tognoni G : A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1667–1675.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, et al: Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1893–1906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Imai E, Horio M, Nitta K, et al: Estimation of glomerular filtration rate by the MDRD study equation modified for Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Exp Nephrol 2007; 11: 41–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fogari R, Mugellini A, Zoppi A, et al: A double-blind crossover study of the antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin II–receptor antagonists and their activationof the renin-angiotensin system. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2000; 61: 669–679.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Guidelines Committee : 2003 European Society of Hypertension–European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1011–1053.

  19. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al: The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–2572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group: Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–2997.

  21. Peterson JC, Adler S, Burkart JM, et al: Blood pressure control, proteinuria, and the progression of renal disease. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 754–762.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weinberg M, Weinberg A, Cord R, Zappe D : The effect of high-dose angiotensin II receptor blockade beyond maximal recommended doses in reducing urinary protein excretion. JRAAS 2001; 2: S196–S198.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hollenberg NK, Parving HH, Viberti G, Remuzzi G : The Diovan Reduction of Proteinuiria (DROP) Study: albuminuria response to high-doses of valsartan in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation 2006; 114: II-61.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lithell H, Hansson L, Skoog I, et al: The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE): principal results of a randomized double-blind intervention trial. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 875–886.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Suzuki H, Kanno Y : Effects of candesartan on cardiovascular outcomes in Japanese hypertensive patients. Hypertens Res 2005; 28: 307–314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

    Mitsuru Ohishi, Takashi Takagi, Norihisa Ito, Yuji Tatara, Norihiro Hayashi, Atsushi Shiota, Yoshihiro Iwamoto, Tomohiro Katsuya, Hiromi Rakugi & Toshio Ogihara

Authors
  1. Mitsuru Ohishi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takashi Takagi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Norihisa Ito
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuji Tatara
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Norihiro Hayashi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Atsushi Shiota
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yoshihiro Iwamoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tomohiro Katsuya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hiromi Rakugi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Toshio Ogihara
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiromi Rakugi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohishi, M., Takagi, T., Ito, N. et al. Renal Protective Effect in Hypertensive Patients: The High Doses of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (HARB) Study. Hypertens Res 30, 1187–1192 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.30.1187

Download citation

  • Received: 02 May 2007

  • Accepted: 08 July 2007

  • Issue date: 01 December 2007

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.30.1187

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • valsartan
  • high dosage
  • changeover
  • Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2004)
  • urinary protein excretion

This article is cited by

  • Is the reno-protective effect of valsartan dose dependent? A comparative study of 80 and 160 mg day−1

    • Tetsunori Saikawa
    • Jun Sasaki
    • Yoshiyuki Ikeda

    Hypertension Research (2010)

  • Strong suppression of the renin–angiotensin system has a renal-protective effect in hypertensive patients: High-dose ARB with ACE inhibitor (Hawaii) study

    • Mitsuru Ohishi
    • Yasushi Takeya
    • Hiromi Rakugi

    Hypertension Research (2010)

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Current issue
  • Collections
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Guide to Authors
  • About the Editors
  • Message from Editors
  • Call for Paper
  • Contact
  • About the Partner
  • For Advertisers
  • Subscribe
  • Showcase of Graphical Abstracts on Hypertension Research

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Hypertension Research (Hypertens Res)

ISSN 1348-4214 (online)

ISSN 0916-9636 (print)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited