Table 4 Effects of antihypertensive treatment on dyssynchrony in the hypertensive patients

From: Impact of antihypertensive treatment on left ventricular systolic dyssynchrony in treatment-naïve hypertensive patients

 

HT with LV systolic dyssynchrony (Group 1, n=29)

HT without LV systolic dyssynchrony (Group 2, n=31)

 

Baseline

After 6 months

Δ change (95% CI)

P-values (paired t-test)

Baseline

After 6 months

Δ change (95% CI)

P-values (paired t-test)

LV systolic dyssynchrony

 Ts-SD12 (ms)

48.6±11.1*

35.6±16.5†

−13.1 (−19.8 to −6.4)††

<0.001

23.1±8.3

25.0±15.7

1.9 (−5.3 to 9.1)

0.592

 Ts-Max (ms)

133.4±38.2*

99.4±43.6†

−34.0 (−55.2 to −12.9)††

0.003

99.4±27.3

72.7±45.1

4.7 (−16.8 to 26.1)

0.659

 Ts-LS (ms)

89.4±38.4*

57.7±89.4†

−31.6 (−50.9 to −12.4)††

0.002

21.8±23.9

32.5±29.3

10.7 (−3.5 to 24.9)

0.134

LV diastolic dyssynchrony

 Te-SD12 (ms)

21.0±8.1

19.8±6.7

−1.2 (−4.1 to 1.7)

0.414

24.0±12.9

23.7±12.2

−0.3 (−5.1 to 4.5)

0.893

 Te-Max (ms)

69.5±26.1

61.2±19.5

−8.3 (−18.3 to 1.8)

0.102

74.7±36.8

74.4±37.7

−0.3 (−14.2 to 13.5)

0.960

Contractile diastolic dyssynchrony

 oExcT (ms)

559.7±329.4

431.0±208.7

−128.7 (−275.4 to 18.0)

0.083

526.8±305.4

400.4±162.5

−126.4 (−243.8 to -9.0)

0.036

  1. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HT, hypertension; LV, left ventricular; n, number; oExcT, sum of the time of strain tracing exceeding aortic valve closure on the overall 12 LV segments; Te-Max, maximal difference between peak early diastolic velocities of any 2 of the 12 LV segments; Te-SD12, s.d. of 12 LV segments time-to-peak early diastolic velocities; Ts-LS, time delay between time-to-peak systolic velocities at the LV basal lateral and septal segments; Ts-Max, maximal difference between peak systolic velocities of any 2 of the 12 segments; Ts-SD12, s.d. of 12 LV segments time-to-peak systolic velocities; Δ, value of follow-up minus value of baseline.
  2. Values are arithmetic mean±s.d.
  3. *P<0.05 vs. baseline in group 2. †P<0.05 vs. after 6 months in group 2. ††P<0.05 vs. Δ change in group 2.