Table 1 Characteristics of the selected studies grouped by outcome measurement

From: Childhood obesity and risk of the adult metabolic syndrome: a systematic review

References

Childhood age (years)

Adult age (years)

Population

n

Tracking of BMI

Effect size and significance

Effect of adjusting for adult BMI/% body fat

Blood lipids

 Freedman et al.19

5–17

18–37

Males and females in Louisiana, USA, born 1959–1968; BHS

2617

r=0.58

Cholesterol r=+0.10*

Triglycerides r =+0.16*

LDL r=+0.11*

HDL r=−0.14*

Relationships inversed

Cholesterol r=−0.08

Triglycerides r=−0.09

LDL r=−0.09

HDL r=+0.07

 Salonen et al.17

0–11

Mean 61.5

Males and females in Helsinki, Finland, born 1934–1944

499

Not reported

HDL—NS

Triglycerides—NS

Not reported

 Sinaiko et al.24

7–18

23

Males and females in Minneapolis, USA, born 1970–71

MCBPS

679

r=0.612**

Cholesterol—NS

Triglycerides r=+0.19**

LDL NS

HDL r=−0.18**

Not adjusted

 Wright et al.20

9, 13

50

Males and females in Newcastle, UK, born 1947

NTFS

412

r=0.24– 0.39

All blood lipids NS for men

Women—age 13 all blood lipids NS

 age 9, Cholesterol r=−0.15*

 age 9, triglycerides r=−0.18*

 age 9, LDL and HDL NS

Men: age 9, triglycerides r=−0.18*

Women: age 9, cholesterol r=−0.17*

triglycerides r=−0.27*

age 13, triglycerides r=−0.19

All other ages/variables NS

 Lauer et al.23

8–18

20–30

Males and females in Iowa, USA, born 1960–70s

2446

r=0.53– 0.84*

Change in cholesterol with change in BMI:

Men r=0.20–0.45*

Women r=0.10–0.26* from ages 11+, but NS at ages 7–10

Not adjusted

Insulin

 Freedman et al.19

5–17

18–37

Males and females in Louisiana, USA, born 1959–1968; BHS

2617

r=0.58

r=0.26*

r=−0.15*

 Freedman et al.18

3–17

Mean 27

Males and females in Louisiana, USA, born 1959–1968; BHS

2911

r=0.58b

Age 3–7, r=+0.27

Age 8–13, r=+0.31

Age 14–17, r=+0.36

Not adjusted

 Martin et al.21

Mean 6

Mean 71

Males and females, England and Scotland, born 1920s and 1930s

456

r=0.12

HOMA −8.0% (CI −0.2 to −15.1) per s.d. change in BMI in childhood

Not adjusted

 Sinaiko et al.24

7–18

23

Males and females in Minneapolis, USA, born 1970–1971

MCBPS

679

r=0.612**

r=+0.28**

Not adjusted

 Thearle et al.16

5–16

Mean 25

Males and females in Gila River Indian Community, USA, born 1960 onwards

76

Not reported

Only adjusted figures reported

Insulin action r=−0.43**

Acute insulin response r=0.32***

A 5 kg m−2 increase in childhood BMI =−7.4% (CI −12.7 to −1.8%) insulin action*

 Wright et al.20

9, 13

50

Males and females in Newcastle, UK, born 1947

NTFS

412

r=0.24– 0.39

NS

Men: age 9, r=−0.17***;

Age 13, r=−0.23***

Women: age 9, r=0.20***; age 13 r=−0.21***

Disease outcomes

 Bjorge et al.22

14–19a

Up to 62

Males and females in Norway, born 1944–1961

226 678

Not measured

Risk of death from diabetes mellitus

Men : NS

Women: results not reported

Not adjusted

 Morrison et al.28

Mean 12.8

Mean 38.4

Males and females, Princeton, USA, born 1960s

814

0.59

For every 1 point change in childhood BMI percentile, the OR for having metabolic syndrome was 1.025 (CI 1.018–1.033)

Not adjusted

 Salonen et al.17

0–11

Mean 61.5

Males and females in Helsinki, Finland, born 1934–1944

499

Not reported

Higher BMI associated with decreased risk of metabolic syndrome for ages 2–11

OR for having metabolic syndrome for every 1 s.d. change in BMI between ages:

0–2: 0.72 (CI 0.57–0.92)

2–7: 0.63 (0.49 0.81)

7–11: NS

OR for having metabolic syndrome for every 1 s.d. change in BMI between ages:

0–2: 0.75 (CI 0.59–0.95)

2–7: 0.63 (0.49 0.81)

7–11: NS

 Srinivasan et al.15

8–17

19–38

Males and females in Louisiana, USA, born 1959–1968; BHS

745

r=0.58b

For every 1 s.d. change in childhood BMI, the OR for having clustering of risk variables for metabolic syndrome was 2.03

Not adjusted

  1. Abbreviations: BHS, Bogalusa Heart Study; BO, Boyd Orr Cohort; CI, confidence intervals; HR, hazard ratios; MCBPS, Minneapolis Children's Blood Pressure Study; MS, Muscatine Study; NTFS, Newcastle Thousand Families Cohort; NA, not applicable; NS, not significant; OR, odds ratios; s.d., standard deviation.
  2. aAlthough age 19 is outside the childhood age criteria, the authors report that when the data were broken down into 14–16 and 17–19, there were no differences between them and the overall findings.
  3. bTracking not reported in this study. However, this figure is from the same Bogalusa cohort as reported by Freeman et al.19
  4. *P<0.05.
  5. **P<0.001.
  6. ***P<0.01.