Table 3 Results of Logistic Regression Analysis for IFG adjusted for gender, age, BMI SDS and Country

From: Impaired fasting glucose prevalence in two nationwide cohorts of obese children and adolescents

 

OR ADA IFG

(95% CI)

OR WHO IFG

(95% CI)

OR for IFG, adjusted for gender, age group and BMI SDS (Ger)

 Age 2–<9 y

1.00

ref

1.00

ref

 Age 9–12.9 y

1.67

(1.44–1.94]

1.71

(1.23–2.37)

 Age 13–15.9 y

1.59

(1.37–1.84)

1.72

(1.24–2.39)

 Age 16–18 y

1.32

(1.09–1.60)

1.16

(0.75–1.81)

 BMI SDS 1.8–2

0.64

(0.54–0.76]

0.66

(0.46–0.96]

 BMI SDS 2–<2.5

0.61

(0.54–0.68)

0.58

(0.45–0.75)

 BMI SDS 2.5–<3.0

0.73

(0.64–0.82)

0.69

(0.54–0.89)

 BMI SDS 3.0–<4.0

1.00

ref

1.00

ref

 Boys vs Girls (ref)

1.24

(1.14–1.35)

1.21

(1.00–1.45)

 Sweden vs Germany

3.43

(3.06–3.84)

3.70

(2.95–4.65)

OR for IFG, adjusted for gender, age group, and BMI SDS (Swe)

 Age 2–<9 y

1.00

ref

1.00

ref

 Age 9–12.9 y

1.73

(1.48–2.02)

1.79

(1.27–2.51)

 Age 13–15.9 y

1.77

(1.51–2.07)

1.93

(1.37–2.72)

 Age 16–18 y

1.50

(1.24–1.81)

1.33

(0.87–2.02)

 BMI SDS 2.3–2.5

1.00

ref

1.00

ref

 BMI SDS 2.5–<3.0

1.04

(0.94–1.14)

1.04

(0.80–1.34)

 BMI SDS 3.0–<3.5

1.20

(1.06–1.36)

1.15

(0.85–1.54)

 BMI SDS 3.5–<4.0

1.44

(1.25–1.66)

1.39

(1.00–1.93)

 BMI SDS 4.0–<4.5

1.54

(1.25–1.91)

1.74

(1.11–2.73)

 BMI SDS >4.5

1.83

(1.36–2.47)

1.79

(0.92–3.45)

 Boys vs Girls (ref)

1.13

(1.03–1.22)

1.09

(0.91–1.31)

 Sweden vs Germany

3.40

(3.04–3.81)

3.66

(2.92–4.60)

  1. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; Y, years. n=35 633. Results are presented using OR and 95% CI. Bold numbers indicate statistically significant differences.