Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Effect of topical anesthesia and age on pain scores during retinopathy of prematurity screening

Journal of Perinatology volume 30, pages 731–735 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

The efficacy of topical anesthesia during retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening has been a controversial issue. To determine the efficacy of proparacaine eye drops (0.5%), we compared the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) scores in 40 preterm infants undergoing ROP screening.

Study Design:

Prospective randomized double masked cross-over clinical trial. The study was conducted in the neonatal intensive units for infants undergoing routine ROP screening exams. Baseline PIPP scores and post-examination PIPP scores at 1 and 5 min were compared for: (1) those receiving saline vs proparacaine eye drops (2) first ROP screening vs second ROP screening, regardless of the type of eye drops used. Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was used to pair pain scores.

Result:

Forty preterm infants were included in the study. Mean gestational age (GA) at first and second examinations was 33.3 and 35.3 weeks, respectively. Proparacaine use significantly lowered mean PIPP scores (P=0.027) and delta scores (P=0.013) at 1 min after examination, but there was no difference at 5 min after examination. Second examinations showed significantly lower mean PIPP scores after examination (1 min (P=0.003) and 5 min (P=0.025)), regardless of the type of drop used.

Conclusion:

Proparacaine eye drops offer significant relief of pain that is apparently short lived. Significantly lower PIPP scores at second ROP examinations suggested that infants of older GA may have a greater ability to tolerate ROP screening. We recommend the use of proparacaine eye drops for the short term, immediate relief of pain during ROP screening in preterm infants of lesser GA.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121 (12): 1684–1694.

  2. Section on Ophthalmology American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Ophthalmology; American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 572–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anand KJ, Craig KD . New perspectives on the definition of pain. Pain 1996; 67: 3–6; discussion 209–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Krechel SW, Bildner J . CRIES: a new neonatal postoperative pain measurement score. Initial testing of validity and reliability. Paediatr Anaesth 1995; 5: 53–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawrence J, Alcock D, McGrath P, Kay J, MacMurray SB, Dulberg C . The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. Neonatal Netw 1993; 12: 59–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stevens B, Johnston C, Petryshen P, Taddio A . Premature infant pain profile: development and initial validation. Clin J Pain 1996; 12: 13–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ballantyne M, Stevens B, McAllister M, Dionne K, Jack A . Validation of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical setting. Clin J Pain 1999; 15: 297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saunders RA, Miller KW, Hunt HH . Topical anesthesia during infant eye examinations: does it reduce stress? Ann Ophthalmol 1993; 25: 436–439.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pacifiers, passive behaviour, and pain. Lancet 1992; 339: 275–276.

  10. Anand KJ, Carr DB . The neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neurochemistry of pain, stress, and analgesia in newborns and children. Pediatr Clin North Am 1989; 36: 795–822.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fitzgerald M, Millard C, McIntosh N . Cutaneous hypersensitivity following peripheral tissue damage in newborn infants and its reversal with topical anaesthesia. Pain 1989; 39: 31–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grunau RE, Whitfield MF, Petrie J . Children's judgements about pain at age 8–10 years: do extremely low birthweight (< or =1000 g) children differ from full birthweight peers? J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1998; 39: 587–594.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grunau RV, Whitfield MF, Petrie JH . Pain sensitivity and temperament in extremely low-birth-weight premature toddlers and preterm and full-term controls. Pain 1994; 58: 341–346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnston CC, Stevens BJ . Experience in a neonatal intensive care unit affects pain response. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 925–930.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anand KJ . Clinical importance of pain and stress in preterm neonates. Biol Neonate 1998; 73: 1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anand KJ, Barton BA, McIntosh N, Lagercrantz H, Pelausa E, Young TE et al. Analgesia and sedation in preterm neonates who require ventilatory support: results from the NOPAIN trial. Neonatal outcome and prolonged analgesia in neonates. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999; 153: 331–338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anand KJ, Hickey PR . Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 1321–1329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grunau RE, Oberlander T, Holsti L, Whitfield MF . Bedside application of the neonatal facial coding system in pain assessment of premature neonates. Pain 1998; 76 (3): 277–286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Belda S, Pallas CR, De la Cruz J, Tejada P . Screening for retinopathy of prematurity: is it painful? Biol Neonate 2004; 86: 195–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marsh VA, Young WO, Dunaway KK, Kissling GE, Carlos RQ, Jones SM et al. Efficacy of topical anesthetics to reduce pain in premature infants during eye examinations for retinopathy of prematurity. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39: 829–833.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boyle EM, Freer Y, Khan-Orakzai Z, Watkinson M, Wright E, Ainsworth JR et al. Sucrose and non-nutritive sucking for the relief of pain in screening for retinopathy of prematurity: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91: F166–F168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gunnar MR, Fisch RO, Malone S . The effects of a pacifying stimulus on behavioral and adrenocortical responses to circumcision in the newborn. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 1984; 23: 34–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A . Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004. Issue No. 3. Article No. CD001069.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Clinical Research Program at Children's Hospital Boston for assistance and advice on randomization procedures and study design and analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA

    M Mehta

  2. Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, USA

    T Mansfield & D K VanderVeen

Authors
  1. M Mehta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T Mansfield
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D K VanderVeen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D K VanderVeen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehta, M., Mansfield, T. & VanderVeen, D. Effect of topical anesthesia and age on pain scores during retinopathy of prematurity screening. J Perinatol 30, 731–735 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.36

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.36

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links