Abstract
The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (the Guide) recommends that terrestrial mammals be provided space free of urine and feces in which to rest. To evaluate the feasibility of meeting this recommendation, the author examined the availability of feces-free resting areas in standard rodent cages over time. Adult rodents (C57BL/6J mice and Wistar rats) were housed singly, in pairs or in trios in shoebox cages at densities that met the space recommendations of the Guide. As housing density increased, the availability of unsoiled resting space declined. For C57BL/6J mice housed singly, in pairs or in trios, most cages lacked unsoiled resting area within 3–6 days (depending on cage size), 2 days or 1 day, respectively. Similarly, for Wistar rats housed singly, in pairs or in trios, most cages lacked adequate unsoiled resting space within 3 days, 2 days or 1 day, respectively. Because most cages lacked adequate unsoiled resting space within 3 days of housing animals, the author concludes that standard cage change frequencies of once a week for adult C57BL/6J mice and twice a week for adult Wistar rats may be inadequate to provide unsoiled resting areas for rodents.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options







Similar content being viewed by others
References
Animal Welfare Act Regulations. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 9, Chapter 1.
Public Health Service. US Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 2002).
Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 8th edn. 51,52,56 (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011).
Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 7th edn. 25 (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1996).
Public Health Service. Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 1986; amended, 2002).
Rosenbaum, M.D., VandeWoude, S. & Johnson, T.E. Effects of cage-change frequency and bedding volume on mice and their microenvironment. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48, 763–773 (2009).
Nicholson, A. et al. The response of C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice to increased housing density. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48, 740–753 (2009).
Burn, C.C., Peters, A., Day, M.J. & Mason, G.J. Long-term effects of cage-cleaning frequency and bedding type on laboratory rat health, welfare, and handleability: a cross-laboratory study. Lab. Anim. 40, 353–370 (2005).
Burn, C.C., Deacon, R.M. & Mason, G.J. Marked for life? Effects of early cage-cleaning frequency, delivery batch, and identification tail-marking on rat anxiety profiles. Dev. Psychobiol. 50, 266–277 (2008).
Berry, A. et al. Social deprivation stress is a triggering factor for the emergence of anxiety- and depression-like behaviours and leads to reduced brain BDNF levels in C57BL/6J mice. Psychoneuroendocrinol. 37, 762–772 (2012).
Kulesskaya, N., Rauvala, H. & Vöikar, V. Evaluation of social and physical enrichment in modulation of behavioural phenotype in C57BL/6J female mice. PLoS One 6, e24755 (2011).
Sharp, J., Zammit, T., Azar, T. & Lawson, D. Stress-like responses to common procedures in individually and group-housed female rats. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 42, 9–18 (2003).
Späni, D., Arras, M., König, B. & Rülicke, T. Higher heart rate of laboratory mice housed individually vs in pairs. Lab. Anim. 37, 54–62 (2003).
Van Loo, P.L. et al. Impact of 'living apart together' on postoperative recovery of mice compared with social and individual housing. Lab. Anim. 41, 441–455 (2007).
Vöikar, V., Polus, A., Vasar, E. & Rauvala, H. Long-term individual housing in C57BL/6J and DBA/2 mice: assessment of behavioral consequences. Genes Brain Behav. 4, 240–252 (2005).
Beynen, A.C. & van Tintelen, G. Daily change of cage depresses mass gain in mice. Z versuchstierkd. 33, 106–107 (1990).
Sharp, J., Azar, T. & Lawson, D. Does cage size affect heart rate and blood pressure of male rats at rest or after procedures that induce stress-like responses? Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 42, 8–12 (2003).
Castelhano-Carlos, M.J. & Baumans, V. The impact of light, noise, cage cleaning and in-house transport on welfare and stress of laboratory rats. Lab. Anim. 43, 311–327 (2009).
Acknowledgements
I thank Emily S. Dudley for editorial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boivin, G. Availability of feces-free areas in rodent shoebox cages. Lab Anim 42, 135–141 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.187
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.187
This article is cited by
-
Clarification of OLAW's position on rodent cage changes
Lab Animal (2013)


