Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Note
  • Published:

Availability of feces-free areas in rodent shoebox cages

Abstract

The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (the Guide) recommends that terrestrial mammals be provided space free of urine and feces in which to rest. To evaluate the feasibility of meeting this recommendation, the author examined the availability of feces-free resting areas in standard rodent cages over time. Adult rodents (C57BL/6J mice and Wistar rats) were housed singly, in pairs or in trios in shoebox cages at densities that met the space recommendations of the Guide. As housing density increased, the availability of unsoiled resting space declined. For C57BL/6J mice housed singly, in pairs or in trios, most cages lacked unsoiled resting area within 3–6 days (depending on cage size), 2 days or 1 day, respectively. Similarly, for Wistar rats housed singly, in pairs or in trios, most cages lacked adequate unsoiled resting space within 3 days, 2 days or 1 day, respectively. Because most cages lacked adequate unsoiled resting space within 3 days of housing animals, the author concludes that standard cage change frequencies of once a week for adult C57BL/6J mice and twice a week for adult Wistar rats may be inadequate to provide unsoiled resting areas for rodents.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Figure 1
Figure 2: A static shoebox cage with 426 cm2 of floor space housing two adult female C57BL/6J mice after 1 day.
Figure 3
Figure 4: An individually ventilated cage with 548 cm2 of floor space housing three adult male C57BL/6J mice after 2 days.
Figure 5
Figure 6: A static shoebox cage with 952 cm2 of floor space housing three adult female Wistar rats after 1 day.
Figure 7: A static shoebox cage with 952 cm2 of floor space housing three adult female Wistar rats after 3 days.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Animal Welfare Act Regulations. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 9, Chapter 1.

  2. Public Health Service. US Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 2002).

  3. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 8th edn. 51,52,56 (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2011).

  4. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 7th edn. 25 (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1996).

  5. Public Health Service. Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 1986; amended, 2002).

  6. Rosenbaum, M.D., VandeWoude, S. & Johnson, T.E. Effects of cage-change frequency and bedding volume on mice and their microenvironment. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48, 763–773 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicholson, A. et al. The response of C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice to increased housing density. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48, 740–753 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Burn, C.C., Peters, A., Day, M.J. & Mason, G.J. Long-term effects of cage-cleaning frequency and bedding type on laboratory rat health, welfare, and handleability: a cross-laboratory study. Lab. Anim. 40, 353–370 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burn, C.C., Deacon, R.M. & Mason, G.J. Marked for life? Effects of early cage-cleaning frequency, delivery batch, and identification tail-marking on rat anxiety profiles. Dev. Psychobiol. 50, 266–277 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berry, A. et al. Social deprivation stress is a triggering factor for the emergence of anxiety- and depression-like behaviours and leads to reduced brain BDNF levels in C57BL/6J mice. Psychoneuroendocrinol. 37, 762–772 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kulesskaya, N., Rauvala, H. & Vöikar, V. Evaluation of social and physical enrichment in modulation of behavioural phenotype in C57BL/6J female mice. PLoS One 6, e24755 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharp, J., Zammit, T., Azar, T. & Lawson, D. Stress-like responses to common procedures in individually and group-housed female rats. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 42, 9–18 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Späni, D., Arras, M., König, B. & Rülicke, T. Higher heart rate of laboratory mice housed individually vs in pairs. Lab. Anim. 37, 54–62 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Loo, P.L. et al. Impact of 'living apart together' on postoperative recovery of mice compared with social and individual housing. Lab. Anim. 41, 441–455 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vöikar, V., Polus, A., Vasar, E. & Rauvala, H. Long-term individual housing in C57BL/6J and DBA/2 mice: assessment of behavioral consequences. Genes Brain Behav. 4, 240–252 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beynen, A.C. & van Tintelen, G. Daily change of cage depresses mass gain in mice. Z versuchstierkd. 33, 106–107 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharp, J., Azar, T. & Lawson, D. Does cage size affect heart rate and blood pressure of male rats at rest or after procedures that induce stress-like responses? Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 42, 8–12 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Castelhano-Carlos, M.J. & Baumans, V. The impact of light, noise, cage cleaning and in-house transport on welfare and stress of laboratory rats. Lab. Anim. 43, 311–327 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Emily S. Dudley for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory P. Boivin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boivin, G. Availability of feces-free areas in rodent shoebox cages. Lab Anim 42, 135–141 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.187

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.187

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing