Table 2 Univariable Cox regression analysis for factors predictive of metastasis

From: The biological and prognostic significance of angiotropism in uveal melanoma

Prognostic factor

n=89

Metastatic events

Five-year survival rate±s.d.

HR

P-value

Age, years

 <60

36

22

0.620±0.083

1

 

 ≥60

53

31

0.406±0.075

1.43 (0.82–2.48)

NS

Gender

 Men

38

23

0.432±0.085

1

 

 Women

51

30

0.550±0.075

0.87 (0.51–1.51)

NS

Tumor diameter

 ≤15 mm

18

8

0.687±0.117

1

 

 >15 mm

71

45

0.449±0.064

1.84 (0.87–3.92)

NS

Tumor thickness (1 md)

 ≤10 mm

22

15

0.394±0.107

1

 

 >10 mm

66

38

0.529±0.067

0.7287 (0.40–1.334)

NS

Extraocular extension

 No

82

46

0.517±0.060

1

 

 Yes

7

7

0.286±0.171

3.028 (1.431–7.181)

<0.01

Angiotropism

 No

50

21

0.684±0.070

1

 

 Yes

39

32

0.261±0.077

3.654 (2.63–9.095)

<0.0001

Melanoma cell type

 Spindle

24

9

0.848±0.081

1

 

 Epithelioid—mixed

65

44

0.373±0.064

2.663 (1.295–5.472)

<0.01

Location (1 md)

 Absence of ciliary body involvement

77

46

0.516±0.061

1

 

 Presence of ciliary body involvement

11

7

0.364±0.145

0.99 (0.447–2.22)

NS

Genomic data

 BAP1 mutation (14 md)

Absent (non)

36

13

0.738±0.080

1

 

Present (yes)

39

31

0.360±0.080

2.864 (1.494–5.49)

0.0015

 Monosomy 3 (7 md)

Absent

25

7

0.764±0.093

1

 

Present

57

44

0.373±0.068

3.72 (1.67–8.29)

0.0013

  1. Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; md, missing data. Metastasis rate was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and the HR was determined by the Cox model.