Table 9 Incidence of gastrointestinal AEs and pancreatitis
Drug/Side effects in % | Nausea | Abdominal pain | Vomiting | Dyspepsia | Diarrhoea | Constipation | Pancreatitis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Imatinib | |||||||
Trial: O'Brien et al.1 | |||||||
Design: randomized trial, newly diagnosed CML CP patients | |||||||
Planned dose: 400 mg daily. N=551 | |||||||
All grades | 43.7 | 27.7 | 16.9 | 16.2 | 32.8 | 8.5 | NR |
Grades 3 and 4 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0 | 1.8 | 0.7 | NR |
Trial: Druker et al.174 | |||||||
Design: follow-up of IRIS | |||||||
Planned dose: 400 mg daily. N=382 | |||||||
All grades | 50 | 37 | NR | NR | 45 | NR | NR |
Trial: Deininger et al.175 | |||||||
Design: randomized trial, newly diagnosed CML CP patients | |||||||
Planned doses: 400 vs 800 mg daily. N=145 | |||||||
All grades, 400 vs 800 mg | 50 vs 58 | NR | 15 vs 28 | Anorexia: 15 vs 22 | 39 vs 56 | NR | NR |
Grades 3 and 4, 400 mg vs 800 mg | 3 vs 3 | NR | 1 vs 0 | 0 vs 0 | 1 vs 6 | NR | NR |
Nilotinib | |||||||
Trial: Kantarjian et al.105 | |||||||
Design: single-arm phase 2 trial, imatinib resistant or intolerant CP CML patients | |||||||
Planned dose: 400 mg twice daily. N=321 | |||||||
All grades | 25 | NR | 13 | NR | 12 | 13 | 47a |
Grades 3 and 4 | <1 | NR | <1 | NR | 2 | <1 | 18a |
Trial: Saglio et al.2 | |||||||
Design: randomized trial, 3 arms, newly diagnosed CML CP patients, imatinib vs nilotinib in two dose regimens | |||||||
Planned doses: 300 mg (N=282) or 400 mg twice daily (N=281) | |||||||
All grades, 300 mg vs 400 mg | 11 vs 19 | NR | 5 vs 9 | NR | 8 vs 6 | NR | 24 vs 29a 15 vs 18b |
Grades 3 and 4, 300 mg vs 400 mg | <1 vs 1 | NR | 0 vs 1 | NR | 1 vs 0 | NR | 6 vs 6a <1 vs 1b |
Dasatinib | |||||||
Trial: Kantarjian et al.4 | |||||||
Design: randomized trial, newly diagnosed CML CP patients, imatinib vs dasatinib | |||||||
Planned dose: 100 mg once daily (N=258) | |||||||
All grades | 8 | NR | 5 | NR | 17 | NR | NR |
Grades 3 and 4 | 0 | NR | 0 | NR | <1 | NR | NR |
Trial: Shah et al.106 | |||||||
Design: randomized trial, CML CP patients with resistance, suboptimal response or intolerance to imatinib | |||||||
Planned doses: 100 mg once daily vs 50 mg twice daily vs 140 mg once daily vs 70 mg twice daily (N=670) | |||||||
All grades, 100 mg once daily vs 50 mg twice daily vs 140 mg once daily vs 70 mg twice daily | 18 vs 20 vs 24 vs 29 | 12 vs 12 vs 13 vs 10 | 7 vs 10 vs 10 vs 13 | 5 vs 3 vs 10 vs 7 | 25 vs 31 vs 29 vs 27 | 9 vs 10 vs 3 vs 2 | NR |
Grades 3 and 4, 100 mg once daily vs 50 mg twice daily vs 140 mg once daily vs 70 mg twice daily | 1 vs 1 vs 1 vs 1 | 1 vs 0 vs 1 vs 1 | 1 vs 1 vs 1 vs 0 | 0 vs 0 vs 0 vs 0 | 1 vs 2 vs 4 vs 4 | 1 vs 0 vs 0 vs 0 | NR |
Bosutinib | |||||||
Trial: Khoury et al.107 | |||||||
Design: phase 2 study in CML CP patients after imatinib and dasatinib and/or nilotinib failure | |||||||
Planned doses: 500 mg once daily (N=118) | |||||||
All grades | 43 | 15 (upper abdominal pain 13%) | 32 | NR | 81 | NR | 24c |
Grades 3 and 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | NR | 8 | NR | 7c |
Trial: Cortes et al.22 | |||||||
Design: randomized trial, newly diagnosed CML CP patients, imatinib vs bosutinib | |||||||
Planned doses: 500 mg once daily (N=248) | |||||||
All grades | 31 | 11 (+ upper abdominal pain 12%) | 32 | NR | 68 | NR | 38a |
Grades 3 and 4 | 1 | 1 (upper abdominal pain 0%) | 3 | NR | 11 | NR | 9a |
Ponatinib | |||||||
Trial: Cortes et al.135 | |||||||
Design: phase 2 trial in Ph+ leukaemias (six different cohorts of CML and Ph+ ALL) | |||||||
Planned doses: 45 mg once daily (N=449) | |||||||
All grades | 3–19 in different cohorts | 10–27 in different cohorts | NR | NR | NR | 5–20 in different cohorts | 0–8 in different cohortsd |
Grades 3 and 4 | 0 to <1 in different cohorts | 2–7 in different cohorts | NR | NR | NR | 0–3 in different cohorts | 0–6 in different cohortsd |