Table 2 Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation status in CLL
From: Immunoglobulin gene sequence analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: updated ERIC recommendations
Item | Recommendations |
---|---|
Standard cases | |
Methodology | Report type of: primers,a PCR product analysis, sequencing method, bioinformatics tools |
Gene identification | IGHV, IGHD, IGHJ genes and alleles; IGHD may be difficult to precisely identify (due to deletions and/or SHM) |
Productive rearrangement | Mutational status determined only for productive rearrangements; if unproductive, mention reasons (out-of-frame junction, stop codon) |
IGHV gene: % of nucleotide identity to germ line | Classification: U-CLL ⩾98%; M-CLL <98%; borderline CLL when 97–97.9% |
Subset identification | For subsets with well-established prognostic value (subsets #1, #2, #4 and #8) |
Difficult cases (frequencyb) | |
Double rearrangements (10.5%) | |
Productive+non-productive concordant status (7.8%) | Same as standard cases (mutational status defined by the productive rearrangement) |
Productive+non-productive discordant status | |
Productive U+non-productive M (0.4%) | Mutational status not determined |
Productive M+non-productive U (0.2%) | Consider as M-CLL |
Double productive | |
Concordant status (1.3%) | Same as standard cases |
Discordant status (0.7%) | Mutational status not determined |
Multiple (more than two) productive rearrangementsc | Mutational status not determined (unless it can be performed on sorted B-cell clones and predominant clones are easily identified) |
Single unproductive rearrangement (0.6%) | Mutational status not determined (after failure of alternative PCR attempts) |
Missing anchors (C104/W118) (0.4%) | Mutational status possible if evidence for IG expression on leukemic cells and/or preserved G-X-G motif in VH FR4 |