Table 2 Comparison of ERα, PR (percentage of positively stained nuclei) and HER2 (DAKO scores) expression in paired samples of 23 breast cancers routinely processed (control) or undergoing decalcification in EDTA, Christensen’s buffer (CBM with or CB without microwave) or Formical-4 (F4)

From: Influence of decalcification procedures on immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology in breast cancer

Sample

ERα

PR

HER2

 

Control

CBM

CB

EDTA

F4

Control

CBM

CB

EDTA

F4

Control

CBM

CB

EDTA

F4

1

100

100

100

100

 

30

1

5

5

 

1+

0

1+

0

 

2

90

100

100

100

 

1

0

0

0

 

0

0

1+

1+

 

3

90

100

100

100

 

1

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

 

4

100

90

100

100

 

100

100

75

90

 

2+

0

0

1+

 

5

100

90

75

100

 

90

75

90

100

 

3+

1+

2+

3+

 

6

0

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

 

3+

3+

3+

3+

 

7

90

50

75

90

 

100

90

100

10

 

0

0

0

0

 

8

97

90

90

100

 

97

100

100

90

 

0

0

0

0

 

9

100

100

100

100

 

0

0

0

0

 

0

0

0

0

 

10

100

100

90

100

 

65

75

65

35

 

0

0

1+

1+

 

11

0

0

 

5

 

0

0

 

0

 

0

0

 

0

 

12

100

75

 

90

 

60

20

 

75

 

0

0

 

0

 

13

100

95

 

75

75

90

95

 

65

65

0

0

 

0

0

14

100

100

 

100

75

100

100

 

100

75

0

0

 

0

0

15

100

75

 

75

75

100

100

 

100

90

0

0

 

0

0

16

35

75

 

35

50

0

75

 

65

75

3+

3+

 

3+

3+

17

100

75

 

90

90

5

75

 

90

65

0

0

 

0

0

18

1

0

10

0

 

10

10

2

10

 

0

0

0

0

 

19

90

75

100

20

 

100

90

100

75

 

0

0

0

0

 

20

100

90

 

90

90

50

35

 

50

50

1+

1+

 

1+

1+

21

100

100

  

100

65

90

  

90

0

0

  

0

22

100

100

 

95

95

65

65

 

90

90

0

0

 

0

0

23

100

95

  

75

100

95

  

75

0

0

  

0