- Article metrics
- Last updated: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 9:29:03 Z
Science papers rarely cited in negative ways
Access & Citations
-
- 757
- Article Accesses
-
- 2
- Citations
Citation counts are provided by Dimensions and depend on their data availability. Counts will update daily, once available.
Online attention
- 502 tweeters
- 11 blogs
- 18 Facebook pages
- 11 Google+ users
- 2 news outlets
- 3 Redditors
- 1 Wikipedia page
- 16 Mendeley
- 1 Citeulike
This article is in the 99th percentile (ranked 1,177th) of the 310,287 tracked articles of a similar age in all journals and the 88th percentile (ranked 134th) of the 1,154 tracked articles of a similar age in Nature
View more on Altmetric
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
Mentions in news and blogs
-
Better Than No Citation?
Genomeweb -
学術論文はめったに否定的に引用されない 批判を目的とする引用は2.4%(記事紹介)
カレントアウェアネス・ポータル - カレントアウェアネス-R -
Science Papers Rarely Cited in Negative Ways
Berman Institute Bioethics Bulletin -
科学论文罕以负面方式被引用
生物360最新文章 -
Is it possible to normalize citation metrics?
SciELO in Perspective -
2015, October 21
Freakonometrics -
On my way to Caen, Normandy
Freakonometrics -
[No title]
August Pamplona
This list highlights individual mainstream news articles and blogs that cite the article. Not all news and blogs link to articles in a way that Altmetric can pick up, so they are not representative of all media. Altmetric are responsible for the curation of this list and provide updates hourly.