Abstract
A risk-based approach to rationalizing field trial regulations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
The evolving EU regulatory framework for precision breeding
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Open Access 17 October 2018
-
Time for a New EU Regulatory Framework for GM Crops?
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Open Access 01 June 2017
-
Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts
Plant Cell Reports Open Access 03 May 2016
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Udelman, M. et al. 1994. Feeding 10 Billion People in 2050: A Report by the Action Group on Food Security. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
Miller, H.I. 1997. Chapters 2 and 4 in Policy Controversy in Biotechnology: An Insider's View, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Huttner, S.L. 1995. overnment, researchers and activists: The crucial public policy interface, pp. 459–494 in Biotechnology, Vol. 12, Brauer, D. (ed.). VCH, Weinheim, Germany.
Anon. 1989. Field Testing Genetically Modified Organisms: Framework for Decisions. Washington DC, National Academy Press.
Miller, H.I., Altman, D.W., Barton, J.H. and Huttner, S.L. 1995. Biotechnology oversight in developing countries: A risk-based algorithm. Bio/Technology 13: 955–958.
Frommer, W., Ager, B., Archer, L. et al. 1989. Safe biotechnology: III. Safety precautions for handling microorganisms of different risk classes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30: 541–548.
Anon. 1988. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories. Centers for Disease Control/National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health & Human Services. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Anon. 1987. Introduction of Recombinant DMA-Engineered Organisms into the Environment: Key Issues. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
Miller, M. and Aplet, G. Biological control: A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Rutgers Law Rev. 45: 285–334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barton, J., Crandon, J., Kennedy, D. et al. A model protocol to assess the risks of agricultural introductions. Nat Biotechnol 15, 845–848 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0997-845
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0997-845
This article is cited by
-
The evolving EU regulatory framework for precision breeding
Theoretical and Applied Genetics (2019)
-
Time for a New EU Regulatory Framework for GM Crops?
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (2017)
-
A risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms
Nature Biotechnology (2016)
-
Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process- vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts
Plant Cell Reports (2016)
-
Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics
Nature Biotechnology (2005)