Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Patents
  • Published:

Faculty and employee ownership of inventions in Australia

A recent Australian legal decision means that, unless faculty members are bound by an assignment or intellectual property policy, they may own inventions resulting from their research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. University of Western Australia (UWA v. Gray) [2008] FCA 498 (first instance); [2009] FCAFC 116 (Full Federal Court); [2010] HCATrans 11 (High Court of Australia refusing special leave to appeal (i.e., certiorari denied)).

  2. Standard Parts Co. v. Peck, 264 U.S. 52 (1924).

  3. U.S. v. Dubilier Condenser Corp., 289 U.S. 706 (1933).

  4. Chisum, D.S. Chisum on Patents, 8–22 (LexisNexis, Matthew Bender, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Speck v. North Carolina Dairy Foundation, 307 S.E.2d 785 (N.C. 1983) rev'd 319 S.E.2d 139 (1984).

  6. Houghton v. United States, 23 F.2d 386, 390 (1928, CCA, 4th cir).

  7. Chew, P.K. Wis. L. Rev. 259–314 (1992).

  8. Browning, C.G. Jr . N.C.L. Rev. 63, 1248–1259. (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Merges, R. Harv. J. Law & Tec. 13, 1–54 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luppino, A.J. UMKC Law Review 78, 367–427 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chew, P.K. Wis. L. Rev. 259–314 (1992).

  12. Kulkarni, S.R. Hastings L.J. 47, 221–256 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, K.G. 1 V.A J.L. & Tech. 1(4), 15 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clements, J.D. IDEA 49, 469–516 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kenney, M. & Patton, D. Research Policy 39, 1407–1422 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bruun, N. Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 23, 913–935, 921 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sterling Engineering Co. Ltd. v. Patchett [1955] AC.

  18. Monotti, A. & Ricketson, S. Universities and Intellectual Property (Oxford University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Christie, A. et al. Analysis of the legal framework for patent ownership in publicly funded research institutions (Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia, 2003).

  20. Australian Productivity Commission. Public support for science and innovation (APC Final Report) (2007). http://www.pc.gov.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0014/37121/scienceoverview.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda McBratney.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McBratney, A., Tarr, JA. Faculty and employee ownership of inventions in Australia. Nat Biotechnol 28, 1019–1022 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1010-1019

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1010-1019

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing