Table 1 Clusters showing significant response to the task.

Contrast	Region	# of voxels	X	Y	Z	Z- score	*T value*
Positive versus null feedback	Right ventral striatum	52	9	20	−7	5.65	6.90
	Left ventral striatum	41	−15	14	−4	5.62	6.84
	Right inferior occipital gyrus	496	36	−88	−7	>10	11.84
	Left inferior occipital gyrus	747	−24	−94	−13	>10	15.08
	Right middle occipital gyrus	664	30	−67	35	6.25	8.00
	Left middle occipital gyrus	338	−12	−73	56	5.52	6.67
Acute phase cartoons versus descriptive	Right ventral striatum	34	10	14	−10	3.94	4.33
	Left ventral striatum	26	−12	14	−4	4.26	4.76
	Left orbitofrontal (BA 11)	111	−27	35	−13	6.29	8.02
	Right cingulum (BA 31)	84	3	−16	47	4.59	5.21
	Right Superior temporal gyrus (STG)	223	63	−43	14	4.39	4.94
	Medial orbitofrontal (BA 11)	135	0	56	−10	4.20	4.68
	Right temporal pole	29	45	17	−31	4.16	4.63
Sustained phase cartoons versus descriptive	Right ventral striatum	36	9	14	−7	3.04	3.42
	Left ventral striatum	24	−12	14	−1	3.38	3.90
	Right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG)	205	18	29	14	4.18	5.18
	Left orbitofrontal (BA 11)	70	−27	35	−10	4.13	5.10
	Right cingulum (BA 31)	75	3	−13	47	3.75	4.47
	Right superior frontal gyrus (SFG)	79	−6	65	11	3.33	3.82
	Right superior temporal gyrus (STG)	28	51	−31	2	3.25	3.71
	Left superior parietal	51	−45	−28	62	2.80	3.09

BA, Brodmann area; Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI).
Clusters showing significant response across groups at a significance level adjusted such that Type I error was controlled for all voxels in the brain using the false discovery rate (FDR), with q=0.05 in more than 10 contiguous voxels. Coordinates are presented in MNI space.

Quick links

Search