Table 2 Sex-stratified analysis of direct and indirect inguinal hernia among GERA discovery cohort.

From: A genome-wide association study identifies four novel susceptibility loci underlying inguinal hernia

SNP

Inguinal Hernia Type

Men

Women

Combined

  
  

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR F

P F

OR R

P R

I 2

P Het

rs2009262

Direct

1.25 (1.16–1.36)

2.31 × 10−8

1.42 (1.04–1.94)

0.03

1.26 (1.17–1.36)

2.81 × 10−9

1.26 (1.17–1.36)

2.81 × 10−9

0

0.46

 

Indirect

1.21 (1.13–1.31)

4.48 × 10−7

1.51 (1.18–1.93)

0.001

1.24 (1.15–1.33)

8.48 × 10−9

1.31 (1.07–1.60)

0.009

62.4

0.1

rs370763

Direct

1.14 (1.06–1.22)

1.60 × 10−4

1.22 (0.94–1.58)

0.133

1.14 (1.07–1.22)

6.38 × 10−5

1.14 (1.07–1.22)

6.38 × 10−5

0

0.65

 

Indirect

1.15 (1.08–1.23)

2.86 × 10−5

1.10 (0.91–1.34)

0.332

1.14 (1.08–1.22)

2.28 × 10−5

1.14 (1.08–1.22)

2.28 × 10−5

0

0.66

rs6991952

Direct

1.21 (1.14–1.29)

8.95 × 10−10

1.03 (0.81–1.30)

0.814

1.20 (1.13–1.28)

2.38 × 10−9

1.16 (1.01–1.34)

0.044

46

0.17

 

Indirect

1.14 (1.08–1.21)

1.17 × 10−5

1.07 (0.89–1.28)

0.461

1.14 (1.07–1.20)

1.20 × 10−5

1.14 (1.07–1.20)

1.20 × 10−5

0

0.46

rs3809060

Direct

1.21 (1.13–1.29)

2.71 × 10−8

1.44 (1.11–1.86)

0.006

1.22 (1.14–1.30)

1.55 × 10−9

1.26 (1.09–1.46)

0.003

44.7

0.18

 

Indirect

1.17 (1.09–1.24)

2.16 × 10−6

1.55 (1.26–1.89)

2.41 × 10−5

1.20 (1.13–1.27)

8.14 × 10−9

1.32 (1.00–1.74)

0.051

85.9

0.01

  1. CI, confidence interval; GERA, Genetic Epidemiology Research in Adult Health and Aging; I2, heterogeneity index; ORF, odds ratio from fixed effects model; ORR, odds ratio from random effects model; PHet, P value for heterogeneity from Cochran’s Q test; PF, P value from fixed effects model; PR, P value from random effects model; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.