Figure 2: Continental scale risk and biodiversity patterns.
From: Factoring attitudes towards armed conflict risk into selection of protected areas for conservation
(a) Risk of conflict from national-scale estimates26. (b) Fine-scale conflict-risk layer derived from the geographical locations of previous conflicts and the severity of the incident30, with the inset identifying the horn of Africa to the Congo Basin displayed in Fig. 3, one of the most conflict-prone but biodiverse regions of Africa (c) Mammal species richness index measured as the proportion of 236 threatened mammals that have part of their range in each planning unit.
