Table 1 Baseline ctDNA mutation prevalence and patient subsets.

From: Heterogeneity and clinical significance of ESR1 mutations in ER-positive metastatic breast cancer patients receiving fulvestrant

Part 1: randomized GDC-0941 and placebo GDC-0941 patients

 

ESR1 wild type, 96 (62.7%)

ESR1 mutation, 57 (37.3%)

Total, 153 (100%)

ESR1 mutation number

 0

96 (100%)

0

96 (62.7%)

 1

0

34 (59.6%)

34 (22.2%)

 2

0

13 (22.8%)

13 (8.5%)

 3+

0

10 (17.5%)

10 (6.5%)

PIK3CA status ctDNA

 Wild type

68 (70.8%)

23 (40.4%)

91 (59.5%)

 Mutation

28 (29.2%)

34 (59.6%)

62 (40.5%)

Luminal status

 Luminal A

58 (60.4%)

41 (71.9%)

99 (64.7%)

 Luminal B

30 (31.3%)

14 (24.6%)

44 (28.8%)

 Other

8 (8.3%)

2 (3.5%)

10 (6.5%)

Visceral disease

 Yes

45 (46.9%)

35 (61.4%)

80 (52.3%)

 No

51 (53.1%)

22 (38.6%)

73 (47.7%)

Resistance to prior AI

 Primary

42 (43.8%)

15 (26.3%)

57 (37.3%)

 Secondary

54 (56.3%)

41 (71.9%)

95 (62.1%)

 Unknown

0

1 (1.8%)

1 (0.7%)

Number of metastatic sites

 0

5 (5.2%)

1 (1.8%)

6 (3.9%)

 1

37 (38.5%)

13 (22.8%)

50 (32.7%)

 2+

54 (56.3%)

43 (75.4%)

97 (63.4%)

 

PIK3CA wild type, 94 (60.3%)

PIK3CA mutation, 62 (39.7%)

Total, 156 (100%)

PIK3CA mutation number

 0

94 (100%)

0

94 (60.3%)

 1

0

56 (90.3%)

56 (35.9%)

 2+

0

6 (9.7%)

6 (3.8%)

Luminal status

 Luminal A

56 (59.6%)

44 (71.0%)

100 (64.1%)

 Luminal B

28 (29.8%)

17 (27.4%)

45 (28.8%)

 Other

10 (10.6%)

1 (1.6%)

11 (7.1%)