Figure 2: Imaging artificial haemodynamic responses induced by CGRP probes in vivo. | Nature Communications

Figure 2: Imaging artificial haemodynamic responses induced by CGRP probes in vivo.

From: Molecular imaging with engineered physiology

Figure 2

(a) Direct effects of superficially perfused CGRP on cerebral vasculature are assessed by optical reflectance imaging of exposed cortex. (b) Cortical image of a single rat, revealing discrete blood vessels (dark) and parenchymal tissue (light background). Scale bar, 100 μm. (c) Time course of average CGRP-induced haemodynamic changes in five animals; shading denotes standard errors as a function of time. The CGRP infusion period is denoted by the blue shaded lines. Top panel shows changes in the diameter of macroscopic vessels as indicated by the red bar in b. Bottom panel shows mean optical signal changes in parenchymal regions as denoted by the black rectangle in b; downward deflection of the curve during CGRP administration is consistent with increasing parenchymal cerebral blood volume, which darkens images. (d) MRI changes observed in conjunction with deep intracranial injection of CGRP (100 nM) or vehicle only (aCSF), both at 0.1 μl min−1. for 10 min into the parenchyma of the thalamus. Coloured voxels overlaid on a greyscale anatomical image (left) indicate the correlation strength of observed signal changes with the injection period. Bar graph (right) indicates peak signal changes observed upon injection of CGRP or aCSF, each averaged over corresponding injection regions in multiple animals (black boxes at left, n=6). Scale bar, 5 mm. (e) Dissociation of CGRP-induced artificial haemodynamic signals from nitric oxide-mediated signalling. Left, haemodynamic responses observed by imaging upon unilateral CGRP injection into the left thalamus, before L-NAME delivery (-LN, top), or into the right thalamus, after 50 mg kg−1 intravenous L-NAME infusion (+LN, bottom). Sites denoted by crossed out boxes did not receive CGRP injections under the conditions labelled. Right, comparison of peak percent signal changes observed in regions as identified on the left, without and with L-NAME and showing no significant difference. Error bars throughout this figure denote s.e.m. values (n=4).

Back to article page