Figure 2: Comparison of carbon fluxes obtained from eddy-covariance or biometric methods for worldwide forests. | Nature Communications

Figure 2: Comparison of carbon fluxes obtained from eddy-covariance or biometric methods for worldwide forests.

From: Evaluating the convergence between eddy-covariance and biometric methods for assessing carbon budgets of forests

Figure 2

(a) Net ecosystem production (NEP, n=31), (b) ecosystem respiration (Reco, n=25) and (c) gross primary production (GPP, n=18) from eddy-covariance (EC; x axis) and biometric (BM; y axis) methods. Bars indicate confidence intervals which are derived from uncertainty ranges related to biome and latitude, constrained by a reduction factor depending on the methodology and by the number of replicate years of measurement (see Methods). The dotted line is the 1:1 line.

Back to article page