Figure 3: Characterization of AP firing.
From: Disrupted neuronal maturation in Angelman syndrome-derived induced pluripotent stem cells

(a) Example traces representing four AP firing patterns used for characterization. Scale bar, 20 mV, 100 ms (b) Distribution of AP firing patterns for control (CTR; 4 subjects; n>250 at each time point), AS (3 subjects; n>250 at each time point) and UBE3A KO (1 line; n>40 at each time point) neurons at three developmental time bins. *P<0.0001 for differences between control and AS; χ2 test. #P<0.0001 for differences between control and UBE3A KO; χ test. (c) AP firing distributions for (top to bottom) control neurons treated with UBE3A ASOs at 6 weeks in culture (7 coverslips, 15 cells per coverslip), control neurons treated with UBE3A ASOs at 18 weeks in culture (4 coverslips, 15 cells per coverslip), AS neurons treated with 1 μM topotecan (2–4 coverslips, 15 cells per coverslip), KCl (10 mM) treated control neurons from four control subjects (n=15 cells per coverslip for 1 coverslip for both vehicle and KCl for each control line). *P<0.0001, χ2 test. (d) Example calcium imaging traces of spontaneous activity from control, AS and UBE3A KO cultures; scale bar, 30 s. (e) Quantification of number of calcium transient for control, AS and UBE3A KO cultures (n>60 at each time point for all three genotypes. *P<0.05 (Student’s t-test) for differences between control and AS. #P<0.05 (Student’s t-test) for differences between control and UBE3A KO. (f) AP amplitude (left), FWHM (middle) and AP threshold (right) for control and AS cultures at three time points (n>250 for both genotypes at each time point). *P<0.0001 for significant differences between control and AS (two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)). Error bars represent mean ±s.e.m.