Nature Communications 5: Article number: 3562 (2014); Published 15 April 2014; Updated 21 March 2017
This Article is retracted by the authors. Nature Communications previously issued an Editorial Expression of Concern (http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms13310) related to this Article, following the publication of a report commissioned by The Karolinska Institute and prepared by the Expert Group for Misconduct in Research at the Swedish Central Ethical Review Board. Owing to the technical issues raised by this investigation, we, the authors, are now retracting the Article.
P.M., S.S., Y.G., S.B., M.A.B., C.D.G., A.S., K.K., H.K., P.D., A.B., R.H., D.R., C.I., B.J. and D.A.T. agree with this retraction. P.J., M.L.L., J.H., G.L., A.B.R., H.U. and Y.Z. could not be reached for comment.
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/ncomms4562
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Sjöqvist, S., Jungebluth, P., Lim, M. et al. Retraction Note: Experimental orthotopic transplantation of a tissue-engineered oesophagus in rats. Nat Commun 8, 15077 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15077
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15077
This article is cited by
-
Tissue specific microenvironments: a key tool for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
Journal of Biological Engineering (2017)
Matthias Corbascio
It is strange that even though the article has been retracted a little window on the Nature homepage pops up under the title 'Recommended' advertising the published version of the article from 2014. I think Nature editors need to inform whoever is responsible for the homepage to try to find some other article to recommend and throw that thing in the bin.