Figure 7: Comparing volumetric imaging results from stimulated Raman projection tomographic and stimulated Raman scattering sectional imaging. | Nature Communications

Figure 7: Comparing volumetric imaging results from stimulated Raman projection tomographic and stimulated Raman scattering sectional imaging.

From: Volumetric chemical imaging by stimulated Raman projection microscopy and tomography

Figure 7

(a,b) Selected image slices of PMMA beads at different positions in the sagittal view (yz plane). (c,d) Selected image slices from the same beads in the coronal view (xz plane). (a,c) Images reconstructed by the stimulated Raman projection (SRP) tomography. (b,d) Sectional images collected by the Gaussian beam stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscope. The imaged volume was 60 × 60 × 50 μm3 for SRS sectioning imaging and 60 × 60 × 60 μm3 for SRP tomographic imaging. The pixel dwell time was 10 μs for the SRS sectional imaging and 24 μs for the SRP tomographic imaging. Scale bars, 10 μm.

Back to article page