Figure 3: ARPES spectra along the Fermi surface for representative dopings.
From: Relation between the nodal and antinodal gap and critical temperature in superconducting Bi2212

Samples are labelled by a doping-level prefix, namely underdoped (UD), optimum (OP) or overdoped (OD), and a trailing number denoting Tc. (a–d) Energy-versus-sin2θ plots of the spectral images for BB, taken in the superconducting state at T=10 K and symmetrized with respect to ω=0 and θ=0. Circles, curves and blue lines denote the gap energies, the next-higher-harmonic fits and the nodal tangents, respectively. (e–h) EDCs at the momenta marked by triangles in panels a–d. Black curves and vertical bars denote the fits and the gap energies, respectively. (i) EDCs in the normal state at T=80 K for UD66 (see Supplementary Fig. S2 for other dopings). (j) Gap energies as functions of sin2θ in the superconducting (red) and normal (green) states of UD66, determining the energies of antinodal gap Δ*, nodal gap ΔN and arc-endpoint gap Δarc (see Supplementary Fig. S2 for other dopings). Error bars indicate the uncertainty of EDC fit. The inset shows the doping dependence of the Fermi-arc endpoint, θarc, at TTc+10 K alongside θarc/p=100° (dotted line). The error bars of θarc stem from the natural broadness of the EDC peaks. The angles inside and outside θarc are labelled by bold and italic faces in e–i, and marked by filled and open triangles in a–d, respectively.