Table 1 Estimated dominance coefficients in YPD for heterozygous lines.

From: Loss-of-heterozygosity facilitates passage through Haldane’s sieve for Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergoing adaptation

BMN line

Gene

Growth rate

Biomass production

  

Dominance

Significance

Dominance

Significance

1

ERG7

−0.58

R

0.63

N

3

ERG6

0.59

D

0.24

R

5

ERG6

−0.21

R

0.44

N

6

ERG6

0.81

D

0.53

I

9

ERG6

−0.18

R

0.37

N

13

ERG6

−0.17

R

0.29

I

16

ERG6

−0.52

R

0.07

R

19

ERG6

−0.27

R

0.23

R

21

ERG3

−0.70

O

0.24

I

22

ERG3

0.76

D

0.28

I

23

ERG3

0.71

D

0.27

I

25

ERG3

−0.40

R

0.19

I

28

ERG3

−0.63

O

0.12

R

29

ERG3

−0.71

R

0.15

R

30

ERG3

−0.31

R

0.31

I

31

ERG3

−0.58

R

0.15

R

32

ERG3

0.47

I

0.12

R

33

ERG3

−0.76

O

0.04

R

34

ERG3

0.91

D

0.77

D

35

ERG5

−0.58

N

0.78

N

  1. D, dominant (heterozygote is significantly different than wild type but not homozygous mutant); I, intermediate (heterozygote is intermediate and significantly different than both homozygotes); N, not clear (heterozygote is not significantly different than either homozygote); O, overdominant (heterozygote grows significantly better than wild type and mutant homozygotes); R, recessive (heterozygote is significantly different than homozygous mutant but not wild type).
Back to article page